Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Retained List - Published

1235712

Comments

  • East Kent Addick
    East Kent Addick Posts: 1,350
    Only surprise there is Henry - from what I've seen  he looks too slow.

    Hector is an upgrade on Inniss and just the sort of experienced player we need alongside a younger player like Ness and I think Thomas is being kept on due to his end of season form and versatility covering left back.

    Morgan has had plenty of chances and can't be knocked for effort but just doesn't have the consistency or quality needed to be a regular starter. 

    Clare is no defender and yet that is where he has played mostly for us due to injuries and lack of squad depth - we need proper defenders - youngsters if necessary to provide cover in defence rather than using players out of position.  I don't think Clare is good enough to play midfield so a good idea to move him on.

    I hope some of the players returning from loan can be offloaded too as apart from McGrandles none of them have done enough on loan to deserve a start in our team.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,483
    A bit sorry to see Clair given the heave ho……I liked his somewhat Cavalier attitude re wanting to push play forward, would like to have seen him given a run at playing midfield where I believe his talent might have improved….there’s no doubting that was where he wanted to play and it showed.
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,599
    edited May 2023
    TEL said:
    Only one I think I'll miss is Morgan. Could t fault his work rate. 
    I could. When the going got tough Morgan went awol.
    Also, he didn't track back anywhere near enough.
    He certainly knew how to pass backwards that's for sure...🙄
  • Would have offered Morgan/Innis a new deal. I thought Lavelle having a further year on his deal (Not guaranteed we will be able to shift him) and Thomas ability to cover LB probably made Innis redundant.

    Will take an wait and see approach on Morgan decision.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,833
    Croydon said:
    Well played Deano, massive clear out there

    interesting summer now  
    There’s two ways of looking at it I suppose. 

    1. Ruthless and encouraging that we want to replace with better players

    2. Tightening budget and looking to scale back where we can

    Not quite sure where I sit tbh 
    Don't think option 2 sits with the fact that we've offered Hector a deal - he won't be cheap.

    We needed a clear out, we've been asking for a clear out, we're getting a clear out. Only positive imo 
    Depends I suppose if the deal we’ve offered is competitive or not. I suppose time will tell 
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,256
    Interesting to read about the conflicting reports re; deals offered to Inniss and Morgan.  Likewise, I expect the Clare we bought two years ago and the wages he was on, aren’t the wages we want to pay him now (nor can afford).  If Holden did offer them all new deals, albeit on lower money, that would be a bit worrying for me on 2 counts.  One, he thought they still had something to offer, two, it would imply there’s a continued focus on cost cutting and that doesn’t bode well when it comes to being able to pay the wages of the sorts of players we need to get us out of this division.

    You could also say that Holden has been a bit more ruthless in saying to those players, you can stay, but you’ll be on less money and see less game time so I can use what I’ve saved on you, to put toward better.  Not renewing Clare and offering a deal to Hector May imply that.  

    We’ll all have our views, and some may be disappointed to see them go.  For me, I won’t miss any of them.  I wish Morgan good luck given he came through our youth system, but ultimately, if he wants a career where he can make an impact, I think that lies in league one.  Wouldn’t be surprised if Clare got another league one team, not top end, and depending on what that club could offer him re: wages.  Inniss, imo would be better off pursuing a career as a scaffolder, but can see him at somewhere like Sutton next season, maybe even Bromley.  

    The big challenge is do we have incoming owners who know what and how much it will take to get promoted.  A repeat of the Jan window under CM (supposedly) and albeit it was a Jan window, would be a disaster, and a repeat of last summer’s window would be just as big a disaster 

    The other elephants in the room are the returning loanees.  Only McGrandles imo has a shot of playing his way into Holden’s plans, leaving Mansfield, Kirk and Lavelle taking up room adding very little.  It’s hard to believe any of them will be given another shot.  Then we’ve got the injured elephant, Aneke.  Our squad is a mess even if we had kept or keep some of the out of contract players on.  
  • Without exactly elaborating, Garner and others have spoken about an attitude/culture problem at the club.

    I just hope that it is swept away with the players leaving and replaced with a new positive belief by the new arrivals.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,052
    Gribbo said:
    Innis to AFC Wimbledon?
    He certainly made an “impact” last time he played there…
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,596
    Does anyone really believe Holden had much of a say in who did or didn't get offered a new contract?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    Chunes said:

    Nonetheless it's very positive news. We can't keep doing what we're doing and expecting different results.
    It goes beyond just ability, the mentality on the pitch over the past few seasons has been diabolical.

    And I really trust Holden, with his psychological approach, to judge who he wants in his camp. 
    It's the same reason that Chris Powell told us back in 2011 ..... major clearout in order to change the mentality in the squad.


  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,052
    Croydon said:
    Well played Deano, massive clear out there

    interesting summer now  
    There’s two ways of looking at it I suppose. 

    1. Ruthless and encouraging that we want to replace with better players

    2. Tightening budget and looking to scale back where we can

    Not quite sure where I sit tbh 
    Don't think option 2 sits with the fact that we've offered Hector a deal - he won't be cheap.

    We needed a clear out, we've been asking for a clear out, we're getting a clear out. Only positive imo 
    Depends I suppose if the deal we’ve offered is competitive or not. I suppose time will tell 
    Spot on, just because we’ve offered Hector a deal doesn’t mean we’ve offered a good deal nor that he’s signed the deal. I reckon there’s still a decent chance he ends up somewhere better than Charlton. 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,386
    Rob7Lee said:
    Does anyone really believe Holden had much of a say in who did or didn't get offered a new contract?
    Did he get less of a say than other managers do? You won't find many clubs where the manager is in total control of incomings and outgoings.
  • Big clear out and honestly not too disapointed either way.

    Innis, Bonne and Gilbey wasnt shocking tbh.

    Clare and Morgan have been hot and cold this season but will miss Clares versatility as other C Lifers have pointed out.

    Harness i thought would be in with a shout as assumed neither AMB or Wollacoot would accept being number 2
    Surprised we're keeping both AMB and Woolacott- both will want a starting place.
    Who says we are keeping both ? 
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,490
    edited May 2023
    Rob7Lee said:
    Does anyone really believe Holden had much of a say in who did or didn't get offered a new contract?
    Negotiating / Offering the likes of Hector a contract, makes it at least look like we're not just keeping the grand-a-weekers and pushing the boat out a bit. Assuming he's being offered an improved deal and not less money 🤷‍♂️
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,231
    Rob7Lee said:
    Does anyone really believe Holden had much of a say in who did or didn't get offered a new contract?


    I think Dean Holden had a say but probably not the wages on any new contracts.


  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,757
    There’s a few people who don’t seem to be quite understanding what the released list is… If they’re in contract, you can’t just get rid of them.
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,960
    Surprised Morgan has gone,seeing as how regularly he played under Holden,Disappointed about Innis as  I liked him,but there you go.Just hope Hector and Thomas sign or we are in trouble at CB.The clear out that many people wanted has happened,I await with some trepidation their replacements.
    Inniss gave us some much needed height at the back and considerably more grit - unfortunately he didn’t really turn up with many goals from the back, his injury record was terrible, and had a real problem with the red mist.
    Not sure his problem was red mist - more the lack of a footballing brain.
  • Redmidland
    Redmidland Posts: 44,700
    Wow that's a clear out and not before time. Garner saw Morgan as a 10, Holden gets rid! Innis has surprised me as I saw an improvement in his game (not the hot headedness) when playing alongside Hector.
    I hope Hector signs for us, but outside of that I'm reserving judgement until I see what players are coming in. Would we offer a contract to Seesegnon once his deal with Fulham has expired? Glad to see the back of Bonne, and Gilbey. Well done to Holden, now let's get new owners and give Holden who he needs by spending some cash!
    Finally why keep Chucks? I see no point with his injury record.
     
    Chucks has a contract.
    Yup my mistake I forgot we resigned him on a 3yr contract. A stupid piece of business and now we're stuck with him. Can only hope he has overcome his injury issues and can actually get through preseason without any reoccurrence!
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,960
    A bit sorry to see Clair given the heave ho……I liked his somewhat Cavalier attitude re wanting to push play forward, would like to have seen him given a run at playing midfield where I believe his talent might have improved….there’s no doubting that was where he wanted to play and it showed.
    Always struck me as a player who didn't want to play right back, hence his desire to always get away from that position whenever he was playing.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,015
    Rob7Lee said:
    Does anyone really believe Holden had much of a say in who did or didn't get offered a new contract?
    Yes.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,386
    Wow that's a clear out and not before time. Garner saw Morgan as a 10, Holden gets rid! Innis has surprised me as I saw an improvement in his game (not the hot headedness) when playing alongside Hector.
    I hope Hector signs for us, but outside of that I'm reserving judgement until I see what players are coming in. Would we offer a contract to Seesegnon once his deal with Fulham has expired? Glad to see the back of Bonne, and Gilbey. Well done to Holden, now let's get new owners and give Holden who he needs by spending some cash!
    Finally why keep Chucks? I see no point with his injury record.
     
    Chucks has a contract.
    Yup my mistake I forgot we resigned him on a 3yr contract. A stupid piece of business and now we're stuck with him. Can only hope he has overcome his injury issues and can actually get through preseason without any reoccurrence!
    Wow that's a clear out and not before time. Garner saw Morgan as a 10, Holden gets rid! Innis has surprised me as I saw an improvement in his game (not the hot headedness) when playing alongside Hector.
    I hope Hector signs for us, but outside of that I'm reserving judgement until I see what players are coming in. Would we offer a contract to Seesegnon once his deal with Fulham has expired? Glad to see the back of Bonne, and Gilbey. Well done to Holden, now let's get new owners and give Holden who he needs by spending some cash!
    Finally why keep Chucks? I see no point with his injury record.
     
    Chucks has a contract.
    Yup my mistake I forgot we resigned him on a 3yr contract. A stupid piece of business and now we're stuck with him. Can only hope he has overcome his injury issues and can actually get through preseason without any reoccurrence!
    3 and a half year deal - only 2 more years to go!
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,960
    I feel a little sorry for Albie, as he always gave his all and I don't think anyone worked out what was his best role. He needs a manager and a club where he is given a long run in a defined role - unfortunately, Charlton is not suited for undertaking such an experiment. 
  • southamptonaddick
    southamptonaddick Posts: 4,055
    edited May 2023
    sm said:
    I feel a little sorry for Albie, as he always gave his all and I don't think anyone worked out what was his best role. He needs a manager and a club where he is given a long run in a defined role - unfortunately, Charlton is not suited for undertaking such an experiment. 
    I don't. He has had plenty of chances to show what he could do and didn't take any of them. 
    I would be interested if anyone, who wanted him to stay, could tell me what he does consistently well. I hope he goes on and has a successful career but I'm not holding my breath. 
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,653
    If you added up the weekly wages , of players that have just been let go how much will that knock off the wage bill, and have we reached break even yet?
  • usetobunkin
    usetobunkin Posts: 2,187
    5 Red Cards, Inniss should be a Door supervisor rather than playing football.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,302
    Well played Deano, massive clear out there

    interesting summer now  
    There’s two ways of looking at it I suppose. 

    1. Ruthless and encouraging that we want to replace with better players

    2. Tightening budget and looking to scale back where we can

    Not quite sure where I sit tbh 
    I'm not getting excited until I see who we replace them with, given the reaction to last year's list at the time, and how the replacement efforts panned out.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,643
    A bit sorry to see Clair given the heave ho……I liked his somewhat Cavalier attitude re wanting to push play forward, would like to have seen him given a run at playing midfield where I believe his talent might have improved….there’s no doubting that was where he wanted to play and it showed.
    Clare worked well with JRS down the right. With JRS gone then no need to keep Clare. 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,052
    edited May 2023
    If you added up the weekly wages , of players that have just been let go how much will that knock off the wage bill, and have we reached break even yet?
    Not even close. I think the last accounts suggested we were losing £10M an year excluding income from transfer fees. Based on that we would need to reduce wages by circa £200k per week to break even. The salaries of the players released won’t even touch the sides.

    Breaking even is a total fallacy for a club like us in L1.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,643
    se9addick said:
    Croydon said:
    Well played Deano, massive clear out there

    interesting summer now  
    There’s two ways of looking at it I suppose. 

    1. Ruthless and encouraging that we want to replace with better players

    2. Tightening budget and looking to scale back where we can

    Not quite sure where I sit tbh 
    Don't think option 2 sits with the fact that we've offered Hector a deal - he won't be cheap.

    We needed a clear out, we've been asking for a clear out, we're getting a clear out. Only positive imo 
    Depends I suppose if the deal we’ve offered is competitive or not. I suppose time will tell 
    Spot on, just because we’ve offered Hector a deal doesn’t mean we’ve offered a good deal nor that he’s signed the deal. I reckon there’s still a decent chance he ends up somewhere better than Charlton. 
    Yeah, I dont expect either Hector or Thomas to be here next season. Hector can certainly get better elsewhere.