Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

India on The Moon

24567

Comments

  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,231
    edited August 2023
    congratulation India, a fantastic achievement. 
    Did Sky cover the landing? 🤓
  • Greenhithe
    Greenhithe Posts: 806
    Anyone mentioning poverty and the money is looking at their "problems" through a western lens. Its a lot more complicated than patting them on the head and dishing out a few quid. I spent 18 months out there  - love the place.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,014
    se9addick said:
    Congratulations to them, a great achievement. Excited to see what their rover finds! 
    Our transfer budget?
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,638

  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    Again, there are hundreds of millions in poverty in india, so why is it odd that we send them aid?
  • MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    Again, there are hundreds of millions in poverty in india, so why is it odd that we send them aid?
    We don't...

    "The Government decided in 2015 to end direct bilateral financial assistance to the Indian government. This continues to be the position. The decision recognised that India has made substantial development gains and was increasingly able to invest in its own development. Since then, we have concentrated on investments to help secure sustainable private sector growth and to tackle climate change, reflecting the importance of continued economic growth to meet the Sustainable Development Goals in India (average income per head is less than $2,500), and that India is one of a handful of countries whose development choices will determine global climate outcomes".
  • MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    We don't.
  • ct_addick said:
    With Modi cozying up to Putin and Xi we shouldn't be sending them anything TBH
    We don't.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,913
    edited August 2023
    MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    We don't.
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,423
    Some Grade-A pub chat on this thread. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    Again, there are hundreds of millions in poverty in india, so why is it odd that we send them aid?
    We don't...

    "The Government decided in 2015 to end direct bilateral financial assistance to the Indian government. This continues to be the position. The decision recognised that India has made substantial development gains and was increasingly able to invest in its own development. Since then, we have concentrated on investments to help secure sustainable private sector growth and to tackle climate change, reflecting the importance of continued economic growth to meet the Sustainable Development Goals in India (average income per head is less than $2,500), and that India is one of a handful of countries whose development choices will determine global climate outcomes".
    As ever the whole article needs to be read. 

    We have may have ceased direct funding to the Indian Government but aid is still delivered in a more targeted way.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/icai-recommendations-on-uk-aid-to-india-uk-government-response/government-response-to-the-independent-commission-on-aid-impacts-review-uk-aid-to-india-march-2023
  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,414
    Prince summed iit up perfectly in Sign O’The Times. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,736
    Some bollox being posted on this thread from both sides of how you look at things. 
    That's exactly how the House of Commons threads got closed down.
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    edited August 2023
    MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    We don't.
    UK sent £2.3 billion to India between 2016 and 2021. They obviously don't need it if they can fund such a huge vanity project. How they can prioritise this over their populations poverty baffles me. 
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265

  • swordfish
    swordfish Posts: 4,238
    seth plum said:
    Brilliant scientific achievement from a place described in my lifetime as the ‘third world’
    Having seen Gil Scott-Heron's name mentioned earlier, your third world quote reminded me of the lyrics to "B Movie" when he refers to the progress of the Arab nations. "The Arabs used to be in the 3rd World, They have bought the 2nd World and put a firm down payment on the 1st one. Controlling your resources will control your world!" 

    Not relevant I know, but as this thread is in danger of disappearing down a political worn hole, I thought I'd throw it in the mix as there's no transfer news.
  • R0TW
    R0TW Posts: 1,684
    Sounds like a new restaurant
  • Wellred
    Wellred Posts: 1,118
    Hal1x said:
    MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    We don't.
    UK sent £2.3 billion to India between 2016 and 2021. They obviously don't need it if they can fund such a huge vanity project. How they can prioritise this over their populations poverty baffles me. 
    We turn a blind eye on what happens to the aid we send been doing for years it's almost like a bribe to keep these countries on our side 
  • Wellred
    Wellred Posts: 1,118
    se9addick said:
    Congratulations to them, a great achievement. Excited to see what their rover finds! 
    Our transfer budget?
     Pink Floyd will be happy they will finally get to meet someone up there 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,736
    R0TW said:
    Sounds like a new restaurant
    Tandoori on the moon.

    You heard it heard it here first. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,386
    edited August 2023
    If India can afford  to play around with space rockets, the country can afford to forego the billions in aid the UK tax payer has sent it over recent years
  • When you say 'India on the moon ' ,do you mean everybody, wow incredible achievement.
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,127
    MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    We don't.
    Spamming the same thing multiple times doesn’t 
    make it true. 
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,763
    Prince summed iit up perfectly in Sign O’The Times. 
    Last September my cousin smoked reefer for the very first time, 
    Now he’s doing whores……it’s June?
  • stop_shouting
    stop_shouting Posts: 3,685
    Some proper old colonial type views on this thread. Why can’t they just be congratulated on such an achievement. I think you’ll find a huge sense of pride in India right now.
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,995
    Good for them. And it makes the Russians look even more inept.
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,403
    Some proper old colonial type views on this thread. Why can’t they just be congratulated on such an achievement. I think you’ll find a huge sense of pride in India right now.
    Good on them.
  • MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    We don't.
    Spamming the same thing multiple times doesn’t 
    make it true. 
    It does.
  • MrWalker said:
    It does seem odd that we send India £30 million+ in aid cash, rising to £60 million in a couple of years.

    Worldwide aid to India is over $2.5 billion a year.
    why is it odd? There's hundreds of millions in poverty in india.
    odd in that we send aid to assist with eradicating poverty yet they can fund an expedition to the moon costing what I wonder?
    Again, there are hundreds of millions in poverty in india, so why is it odd that we send them aid?
    We don't...

    "The Government decided in 2015 to end direct bilateral financial assistance to the Indian government. This continues to be the position. The decision recognised that India has made substantial development gains and was increasingly able to invest in its own development. Since then, we have concentrated on investments to help secure sustainable private sector growth and to tackle climate change, reflecting the importance of continued economic growth to meet the Sustainable Development Goals in India (average income per head is less than $2,500), and that India is one of a handful of countries whose development choices will determine global climate outcomes".
    As ever the whole article needs to be read. 

    We have may have ceased direct funding to the Indian Government but aid is still delivered in a more targeted way.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/icai-recommendations-on-uk-aid-to-india-uk-government-response/government-response-to-the-independent-commission-on-aid-impacts-review-uk-aid-to-india-march-2023
    That's pretty much acknowledged in the quoted I copied and pasted:-

    "Since then, we have concentrated on investments to help secure sustainable private sector growth and to tackle climate change, reflecting the importance of continued economic growth to meet the Sustainable Development Goals in India (average income per head is less than $2,500), and that India is one of a handful of countries whose development choices will determine global climate outcomes".
  • Valleyfan2
    Valleyfan2 Posts: 224
    I reckon the rover will have a fair chance of finding Nicky Baily’s penalty ball.