Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

T20 Cricket World Cup 2024

1…89111314…32

Comments

  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    33-7, 8.4 overs

    Caught at slip off the bowling of Adil Rashid
  • blackpool72blackpool72
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    killerandflash said:
    With England's batting, surely batting first and flaying the Oman bowlers everywhere would have been better?
    Works both ways though doesn't it? If we bowl Oman out for 60 and then smash that in 5 overs it's just as good.
    They won't even make 60.



    It's coming home 
  • killerandflashkillerandflash
    The advantage of batting first is that it gives our batsmen some much needed practice.
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    Archer’s just bowled a maiden over.

    35-7 off 10 overs
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    36-8, 10.5 overs

    Batter done by a Rashid googly
  • FishCostaFortuneFishCostaFortune
    Callumcafc said:
    36-8, 10.5 overs

    Batter done by a Rashid googly
    FFS can’t smash them off in one over now.

    (probably)
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    FishCostaFortune said:
    Callumcafc said:
    36-8, 10.5 overs

    Batter done by a Rashid googly
    FFS can’t smash them off in one over now.

    (probably)
    2 overs?
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    edited June 13
    47-9, 12.5 overs

    Another googly gets another wicket for Adil Rashid & breaks the biggest partnership (11) of the Oman innings.
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    Rashid finishes his four over with figures of 4-11.
  • blackpool72blackpool72
    blackpool72 said:
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    killerandflash said:
    With England's batting, surely batting first and flaying the Oman bowlers everywhere would have been better?
    Works both ways though doesn't it? If we bowl Oman out for 60 and then smash that in 5 overs it's just as good.
    They won't even make 60.



    It's coming home 
    Told ya 
  • Sponsored links:


  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    47 all out, 13.2 overs

    Archer bounces out the last wicket.
  • golfaddickgolfaddick
    Rough maths says we need to get the runs in 10 overs to get our NRR above the jocks. 
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    edited June 13
    Scotland's NRR is 2.164.

    If England chase this target in:

    - exactly 8 overs, their NRR will be ~1.400
    - exactly 7 overs, their NRR will be ~1.700 
    - exactly 6 overs, their NRR will be ~2.000
    - exactly 5 overs, their NRR will be ~2.300
  • blackpool72blackpool72
    golfaddick said:
    Rough maths says we need to get the runs in 10 overs to get our NRR above the jocks. 
    We're do it in 6
  • killerandflashkillerandflash
    A bit farcical when qualification depends on smashing the minnows to get the best NRR, and rain can remove the chance to do that. 
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    edited June 13
    Of course we need Australia to beat Scotland which will mean their final NRR will be lower if it happens.
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    edited June 13
    golfaddick said:
    Rough maths says we need to get the runs in 10 overs to get our NRR above the jocks. 
    https://x.com/thebarmyarmy/status/1801346146985496845?s=46&t=ynww82GMl7VKBjthBflU0g

    Barmy Army says 5.2 overs to get above Scotland’s NRR.

    You have to add the runs from all the innings faced or bowled together so Australia & Oman together scored 248 from 40 overs against us (RR 6.200). Oman’s innings count for 20 overs since we bowled them out.

    We have to be above Scotland’s 2.164 in net. Meaning our run rate from overs faced has to be 8.364 or higher.

    We managed 8.250 against Australia so we have to be almost 9.0 runs per over in this chase to bump that figure up above 8.364.
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    Of course we need Australia to beat Scotland which will mean their final NRR will be lower if it happens.
    Agreed but best to assume the Aussies will do it in the most annoying way possible. Scotland will probably lose 0.001 in run rate from them!
  • FishCostaFortuneFishCostaFortune
    What’s our net run rate if we do it in 2?
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    edited June 13
    FishCostaFortune said:
    What’s our net run rate if we do it in 2?
    Lol

    3.500 roughly
  • Sponsored links:


  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    You woud expect us to be able to do it comfortably in 5 at most.
  • fenaddickfenaddick

  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    Ian Ward’s just said if England chase this in 3 overs, our net would only improve to 0.3.

    I’m assuming he hasn’t accounted for Oman’s innings counting for a full 20 overs.
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    Phil Salt smashes a six off the first ball
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    Callumcafc said:
    Phil Salt smashes a six off the first ball
    Phil Salt smashes a six off the second ball
  • killerandflashkillerandflash
    All it bit farcical really. 6 or bust.

    Would be awkward if England got bowled out for 46 though  :D
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    Callumcafc said:
    Callumcafc said:
    Callumcafc said:
    Phil Salt smashes a six off the first ball
    Phil Salt smashes a six off the second ball
    Phil Salt bowled off the third ball!
    It what you have to do. We need to win this as quickly as possible.
  • fenaddickfenaddick
    Callumcafc said:
    Ian Ward’s just said if England chase this in 3 overs, our net would only improve to 0.3.

    I’m assuming he hasn’t accounted for Oman’s innings counting for a full 20 overs.
    I couldn’t work out what on earth he’d done for the maths there, sounded like he didn’t believe it either 
  • blackpool72blackpool72
    Callumcafc said:
    Ian Ward’s just said if England chase this in 3 overs, our net would only improve to 0.3.

    I’m assuming he hasn’t accounted for Oman’s innings counting for a full 20 overs.
    He's a thick cnut 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!