Simon Church **SIGNED TWO YEAR DEAL**
Comments
-
jakecafc said:
I have every confidence we will sign a Prem youngster like Harry Kane on loan but that won't be till the end of August.
I f*cking hope not. He was absolutely pathetic in the U20 world cup0 -
i would not have chopra here at all the bloke has more baggage than anyone else out there, and coming to London would not be advisable for that young man there may be people still wanting to talk to him0
-
Have been told its nailed on.0
-
who, Church?0
-
that then makes our decision to let 2 of our strikers to leave even more idiotic. Haynes, at least, should have been given a deal to keep him here.Its_Hamer_Time said:Who are people honestly wanting us to sign? Any decent striker will be in a contract, and by the slim chance they were without a club then they'll be snapped up now anyway. We havent got money for big wages and certainly not for a fee.
.
I suppose you are now going to say that CP had been told that he was going to have funds to spend from a takeover........even if that was the case then still keep Haynes and then ditch him later if you find better. Our transfer policy this season has gone beyond stupid.
0 -
he's gone blackpool anywaynth london addick said:i would not have chopra here at all the bloke has more baggage than anyone else out there, and coming to London would not be advisable for that young man there may be people still wanting to talk to him
0 -
Golfie in negative post shocker.golfaddick said:
that then makes our decision to let 2 of our strikers to leave even more idiotic. Haynes, at least, should have been given a deal to keep him here.Its_Hamer_Time said:Who are people honestly wanting us to sign? Any decent striker will be in a contract, and by the slim chance they were without a club then they'll be snapped up now anyway. We havent got money for big wages and certainly not for a fee.
.
I suppose you are now going to say that CP had been told that he was going to have funds to spend from a takeover........even if that was the case then still keep Haynes and then ditch him later if you find better. Our transfer policy this season has gone beyond stupid.
0 -
You suppose I'm going to say that? Based on what, I've never mentioned a takeover or what I think CP is thinking. I'm basing my argument on what people are saying, and the constant moaning that Obika/Church aren't good enough. Who else should we get was my question! The takeover comment was made up in your head mate!golfaddick said:
that then makes our decision to let 2 of our strikers to leave even more idiotic. Haynes, at least, should have been given a deal to keep him here.Its_Hamer_Time said:Who are people honestly wanting us to sign? Any decent striker will be in a contract, and by the slim chance they were without a club then they'll be snapped up now anyway. We havent got money for big wages and certainly not for a fee.
.
I suppose you are now going to say that CP had been told that he was going to have funds to spend from a takeover........even if that was the case then still keep Haynes and then ditch him later if you find better. Our transfer policy this season has gone beyond stupid.0 -
I personally think we'll sign Obika, get a prem striker on loan nearer the end of August and then ask Smith/Pigott to step up.
Harriott stepped up no problem, don't see why Smith and/or Pigott can't.0 -
But we couldn't keep Haynes without offering him a new contract (and signing on fee)golfaddick said:
that then makes our decision to let 2 of our strikers to leave even more idiotic. Haynes, at least, should have been given a deal to keep him here.Its_Hamer_Time said:Who are people honestly wanting us to sign? Any decent striker will be in a contract, and by the slim chance they were without a club then they'll be snapped up now anyway. We havent got money for big wages and certainly not for a fee.
.
I suppose you are now going to say that CP had been told that he was going to have funds to spend from a takeover........even if that was the case then still keep Haynes and then ditch him later if you find better. Our transfer policy this season has gone beyond stupid.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
we got rid of haynes because of long standing issues with his hamstrings. to give a player who's fitness we have significant doubts about would be more stupid IMHOgolfaddick said:
that then makes our decision to let 2 of our strikers to leave even more idiotic. Haynes, at least, should have been given a deal to keep him here.Its_Hamer_Time said:Who are people honestly wanting us to sign? Any decent striker will be in a contract, and by the slim chance they were without a club then they'll be snapped up now anyway. We havent got money for big wages and certainly not for a fee.
.
I suppose you are now going to say that CP had been told that he was going to have funds to spend from a takeover........even if that was the case then still keep Haynes and then ditch him later if you find better. Our transfer policy this season has gone beyond stupid.0 -
Hard to make that call without knowing what Haynes' wage/term demands were but having only 1 or 2 senior strikers is not a good place to be.golfaddick said:
that then makes our decision to let 2 of our strikers to leave even more idiotic. Haynes, at least, should have been given a deal to keep him here.Its_Hamer_Time said:Who are people honestly wanting us to sign? Any decent striker will be in a contract, and by the slim chance they were without a club then they'll be snapped up now anyway. We havent got money for big wages and certainly not for a fee.
.
I suppose you are now going to say that CP had been told that he was going to have funds to spend from a takeover........even if that was the case then still keep Haynes and then ditch him later if you find better. Our transfer policy this season has gone beyond stupid.0 -
We didn't get rid of him at all. he was offered a year long contract on reduced money - decided to look elsewhere - as ya do...kitchenchef said:
we got rid of haynes because of long standing issues with his hamstrings. to give a player who's fitness we have significant doubts about would be more stupid IMHO
0 -
I don't believe thats true. I'm certain we let him go because of his hamstrings. Happy to grovel if wrong ;0)cafc-west said:
We didn't get rid of him at all. he was offered a year long contract on reduced money - decided to look elsewhere - as ya do...kitchenchef said:
we got rid of haynes because of long standing issues with his hamstrings. to give a player who's fitness we have significant doubts about would be more stupid IMHO0 -
He's a welsh international isn't he?0
-
They both could be right.kitchenchef said:
I don't believe thats true. I'm certain we let him go because of his hamstrings. Happy to grovel if wrong ;0)cafc-west said:
We didn't get rid of him at all. he was offered a year long contract on reduced money - decided to look elsewhere - as ya do...kitchenchef said:
we got rid of haynes because of long standing issues with his hamstrings. to give a player who's fitness we have significant doubts about would be more stupid IMHO
We offered less money because of his hamstrings.0 -
Lovely bit of fence sitting! ;0)stonewallpenalty said:
They both could be right.kitchenchef said:
I don't believe thats true. I'm certain we let him go because of his hamstrings. Happy to grovel if wrong ;0)cafc-west said:
We didn't get rid of him at all. he was offered a year long contract on reduced money - decided to look elsewhere - as ya do...kitchenchef said:
we got rid of haynes because of long standing issues with his hamstrings. to give a player who's fitness we have significant doubts about would be more stupid IMHO
We offered less money because of his hamstrings.
0 -
Lovely bit of fence sitting! ;0)
What with his hamstrings ?0 -
Is this new word game.....
Church - Haynes - Hamstrings0 -
Has church been on trial anywhere else, if so why hasnt he got a club yet? ....... are we scraping the barrel?
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
yes we are and looking down the side of the sofa for spare change
0 -
i think it might be worth leaving the change in sofa for now,would like to be proved wrong should he sign,but the prospect does not really warm the cockles!!!!0
-
i agree- i mean look at all the people talking about how good the likes of fuller and hulse werejakecafc said:We have to take what we can get given the situation. Playing off Kermy many strikers can be made to look good because he wins everything in the air and feeds his striking partners so I think Church would do well with him.
:P0 -
He is indeed. He is a striker. He has made 22 apps for the national team - and scored once.POSLCAFC said:He's a welsh international isn't he?
0 -
That's a pretty good scoring ratio if you play for Wales.Viewfinder said:
He is indeed. He is a striker. He has made 22 apps for the national team - and scored once.POSLCAFC said:He's a welsh international isn't he?
0 -
U21 record is excellent though0
-
For God sake if he signs most of us will be well happy. Saying that he probably won't and I hope he hasn't looked at this negative forum.0
-
Not I.eug72 said:For God sake if he signs most of us will be well happy. Saying that he probably won't and I hope he hasn't looked at this negative forum.
0 -
Church
explosive innocent virtue (goals scored B.C.) superb player
Injured cant get a game sinner (goals scored A.D) feck all
Genesis - Sir Chris Powell
church admonished and reformed by the holy trinity? Goals galore
hope.dies.last
COYR0 -
Spoke to a Reading fan about him. She said that he was a decent player but was unfortunate to be behind some very good players in the likes of Long and Kitson etc. Reckons he'd do a job for us.0
