Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Wendies at war (Madine sent down)

1246

Comments

  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556

    Look at the Semedo tackle again, he never even touched him, he won the ball and still had one foot on the ground, we were robbed again yesterday by the officials.

    Tell you what, the state of football with the officials is shocking.

    Are you blind? Watch it again, he clearly makes contact with the guy's ankle and his foot is high. Correct decision.
  • Sheffield Wednesday are gash. Even Yeovil have won a game.
  • O-Randy-Hunt
    O-Randy-Hunt Posts: 10,635

    Look at the Semedo tackle again, he never even touched him, he won the ball and still had one foot on the ground, we were robbed again yesterday by the officials.

    Tell you what, the state of football with the officials is shocking.

    Are you blind? Watch it again, he clearly makes contact with the guy's ankle and his foot is high. Correct decision.
    Pigs looking for a bite as usual.
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    Not looking for a bite at all mate, you look at the tackle and you'll see he never made contact, the ref was conned, Semedo left the pitch in tears as he couldn't actually believe he was shown the red card, if we don't get it rescinded then something is wrong.
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247

    Sheffield Wednesday are gash. Even Yeovil have won a game.

    Too many draws mate, but we've had some unbelievable bad luck, if we could just get a couple of back to back wins and kick on from there, don't worry, it's coming.
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,309

    Sheffield Wednesday are gash. Even Yeovil have won a game.

    Too many draws mate, but we've had some unbelievable bad luck, if we could just get a couple of back to back wins and kick on from there, don't worry, it's coming.
    I think most football fans who follow a losing team say this
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556

    Not looking for a bite at all mate, you look at the tackle and you'll see he never made contact, the ref was conned, Semedo left the pitch in tears as he couldn't actually believe he was shown the red card, if we don't get it rescinded then something is wrong.

    I've watched it on iPlayer, he clearly makes a lot of contact with his ankle and his foot is high. There's bias, and then there's refusing to see what's right in front of you.
  • Sheffield Wednesday are gash. Even Yeovil have won a game.

    Too many draws mate, but we've had some unbelievable bad luck, if we could just get a couple of back to back wins and kick on from there, don't worry, it's coming.
    On here, the saying is Sheff U will come good.
  • @OP

    If you think that there was no contact then you need to get down to specsavers mate?
  • Nicholas
    Nicholas Posts: 7,626
    I don't think it was a sending off, Semedo get's the ball first but as his sliding with the ball it hits the players ankle.
  • Sponsored links:



  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,556
    I hope this image comes out large enough to see
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588
    edited October 2013
    He clearly gets the player on the Right ankle. To say he doesn't make contact is just embarrassingly blinkered and rediculous. No way will it, or should it be rescinded.....Oh and the disallowed goal was also the correct decision.
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588

    I hope this image comes out large enough to see

    If they refuse to see what's right infront of them on a video it's unlikely they'll admit they're wrong with a pic. But good effort anyway.

  • cafcsinger
    cafcsinger Posts: 5,548
    Sending off or not it what the 85th min wasn't it? Wouldn't have made a difference.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Was a harsh sending off but no chance of a successful appeal.
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    We'll see, I think it will be overturned but I'll not hold my breath.

    Looking at still images doesn't say anything, he never made any contact, the Bolton player got him sent off, simple as that.

    As for it being in the 85th minute, we were on top for most of the game but we totally lost momentum after Semedos sending off, It was a shame because Semedo was absolutely brilliant all game, and I've been a big critic of his in the championship.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989
    Personally, I can't see Semedo got the ball, as the ball continues in the opposite direction to Semedo's slide.

    Semedo definitely took the player & it was a reckless challenge. Definitely a yellow & most refs in this day and age would give a red.

    Similarish challenge to the one Pritch did at Bournemouth, 1st game of the season & got a red card.
  • Absurdistan
    Absurdistan Posts: 8,024
    Shocking tackle, deserved the red.
    Miss Piggy must have borrowed Wengers rose tinted contacts.
  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,699
    If he appeals that then he deserves a longer ban for a trivial appeal.
  • Sponsored links:



  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,885
    edited October 2013
    These days it doesn't matter if the player does get a piece of the ball, it was the aggressiveness / recklessness call it what you like, of the challenge resulting in a dangerous follow through which has been outlawed. Sorry Piggy, straight red and no point in appealing IMO.
    Edit: FIFA Fouls and Misconduct law 12.9 refers and check out part II 63 & 64 http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_12_fouls_misconduct_en_47379.pdf
  • Can't believe Wendy will appeal once they have a good look at the footage. Waste of money. Not a chance in a million it will be rescinded.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    Guys, you're using images and videos to make your point, which is clearly biased and not a true reflection of the events.... ; )
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588

    Guys, you're using images and videos to make your point, which is clearly biased and not a true reflection of the events.... ; )

    Yeah true. Semedo cried so what more evidence can there be?

  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    DRAddick said:

    Guys, you're using images and videos to make your point, which is clearly biased and not a true reflection of the events.... ; )

    Yeah true. Semedo cried so what more evidence can there be?

    Obviously cares a lot for this club - fair play, hope the appeal goes his way, he's worked hard to get back into the side and with a crucial trip away at Barnsley next saturday I hope he gets to play in it.
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167

    DRAddick said:

    Guys, you're using images and videos to make your point, which is clearly biased and not a true reflection of the events.... ; )

    Yeah true. Semedo cried so what more evidence can there be?

    Obviously cares a lot for this club - fair play, hope the appeal goes his way, he's worked hard to get back into the side and with a crucial trip away at Barnsley next saturday I hope he gets to play in it.
    He used to cry when he got sent off for us too, which happened more regularly than I liked
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588

    DRAddick said:

    Guys, you're using images and videos to make your point, which is clearly biased and not a true reflection of the events.... ; )

    Yeah true. Semedo cried so what more evidence can there be?

    Obviously cares a lot for this club - fair play, hope the appeal goes his way, he's worked hard to get back into the side and with a crucial trip away at Barnsley next saturday I hope he gets to play in it.
    What's that got to do with the fact it was a bad tackle and you and the other Wednesdayites are ignoring all evidence to that fact with your only arguement to the contrary being that he cried?
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    edited October 2013
    Like I said, in my opinion it wasn't a bad tackle, I've seen it live and saw it on TV, it looks much worse on TV but he won the ball, no point was two feet off the pitch he had one foot on the deck, the kid made a meal of it, about 2 minutes before that Buxton was chopped down from behind and the Bolton player wasn't even shown a yellow.

    Going round in circles on here anyway, as it's plainly obvious you all think it's a red.

    Goodnight.
  • Dont matter if he got the man or the ball, he was was reckless.
    When he starts the challenge both feet are off the ground. Straight red.
    Saying he didn't touch the man is crazy, it don;t make any difference. Do people want injured players before the ref can act?
    Makes mad when so called experts say, the player got a bit of the ball. You can't play through a man to get the ball.
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588
    edited October 2013

    Like I said, in my opinion it wasn't a bad tackle, I've seen it live and saw it on TV, it looks much worse on TV but he won the ball, no point was two feet off the pitch he had one foot on the deck, the kid made a meal of it, about 2 minutes before that Buxton was chopped down from behind and the Bolton player wasn't even shown a yellow.

    Going round in circles on here anyway, as it's plainly obvious you all think it's a red.

    Goodnight.

    That's not what you said, you said "he never touched him" and "He never made contact".

    Night night.