I don't believe there'd be any announcement from the club unless it were a "done deal". There's probably some tax advantage to getting it done before year-end.
It's not a "done deal" as the club statement makes clear.
The year end is not relevant to tax as the club's tax year is july to june
I don't believe there'd be any announcement from the club unless it were a "done deal". There's probably some tax advantage to getting it done before year-end.
It's not a "done deal" as the club statement makes clear.
The year end is not relevant to tax as the club's tax year is july to june
I don't believe there'd be any announcement from the club unless it were a "done deal". There's probably some tax advantage to getting it done before year-end.
It's not a "done deal" as the club statement makes clear.
The year end is not relevant to tax as the club's tax year is july to june
I was suggesting that spending money on a new asset would reduce a companies profit in a calendar year, thus reducing their tax liability, nothing to do with Charlton's fiscal year.
Sorry this whole story sounds like bollocks. I would caution you to wait until it's officially announced or we'll end up with sixty more pages of conjecture.
Sorry this whole story sounds like bollocks. I would caution you to wait until it's officially announced or we'll end up with sixty more pages of conjecture.
I don't believe there'd be any announcement from the club unless it were a "done deal". There's probably some tax advantage to getting it done before year-end.
It's not a "done deal" as the club statement makes clear.
The year end is not relevant to tax as the club's tax year is july to june
The end of the month might be, though. :-)
For those speculating that the leak to the Mail came from the Cash camp, why would they disclose a price that (as above) makes them look a bit silly?
I was suggesting that spending money on a new asset would reduce a companies profit in a calendar year, thus reducing their tax liability, nothing to do with Charlton's fiscal year.
Only if the buying company's tax year was the same as the calender year which is unusual apart from some retail firms.
Even then I would guess people worth 0.5bn have good tax avoidence advisors
Sorry this whole story sounds like bollocks. I would caution you to wait until it's officially announced or we'll end up with sixty more pages of conjecture.
It's not "bollocks" as the OS has confirmed talks are happening.
That doesn't mean it will get done but not bollocks
Here's a brief profile on the chap based on what I could glean from Wiki and poorly translated websites - surprising that he only bought the German team this month also;
I work with a girl who is married to a Belgian. Duchatelet is very well known and is generally considered to be smart and a good guy - only surprise is he wants to buy an English football club, but hopefully he sees our potential.
If this happens sounds better than a lot of the other options previously rumoured/discussed.
Comments
:-)
The year end is not relevant to tax as the club's tax year is july to june
For those speculating that the leak to the Mail came from the Cash camp, why would they disclose a price that (as above) makes them look a bit silly?
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR CHARLTON!
Even then I would guess people worth 0.5bn have good tax avoidence advisors It's not "bollocks" as the OS has confirmed talks are happening.
That doesn't mean it will get done but not bollocks
http://www.castrust.org/2013/12/famous-belgium-latest-name-charlton-take-saga/
If this happens sounds better than a lot of the other options previously rumoured/discussed.