Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kent CCC Fixtures, Results & News

1112113115117118145

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    Ooh Fanny I do believe you've lost that label.

    54-5 ;-)
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    55-6 Two to Riley (2-1) Bollinger and Stevens.

    Unbelievable scenes on CL!!!
  • Stewart
    Stewart Posts: 2,451
    Now 56-7 with only 23 extras
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    edited June 2014
    Meanwhile in the 2nd XI match against Sussex, Kent are 190-0 with Northeast 103* and Piesley 67*.

    I smell a recall for Cowdrey in the next CC match. Not saying it's right but suspect it will happen now.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    82-8
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,740
    Only just logged on since lunchtime & what do I find ?????

    Let's hope we can stay focused......for once !
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,740
    YESSSSSSSSS!!

    Derbyshire all out for 115 !!

    We can win this one, lads !

    ( As the black rain clouds loom over Dartford....)n
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,740
    Following on , Derbyshire 8-1 .

    Stevo strikes again !!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    Riley 4-30 making it 28 wickets this season at 26.35. Little wonder Tredders is having to ply his trade for Sussex (0-40 off 8 overs in the current CC match against Durham).

    Durham following on now 8-1.

    Fanny all is forgiven ;-)

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    Close of play - Derby 32-3 so 186 behind.

  • Sponsored links:



  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    Well, well.

    333 from 259-8 so 3 batting points, bowl them out for 115, enforce the follow on and 32-3 at the close!

    This is all unKentlike! What's the catch? Well I make it 15 wickets in the day and I believe the pitch inspector is called if more than 14 wickets fall on either of the first 2 days of a match.

    What's the betting we lose all those bonus points as a deduction for a poor pitch?

    (Sorry it's the Charlton fan in me!)
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    Hopefully nothing to fear Len (from Cricinfo report):

    Scott Elstone laboured 26 balls for his nought before becoming the first of Riley's victims on a dry, dusting surface, which was being monitored closely by David Capel, the ECB pitch inspector. Former England allrounder Capel was making a routine visit and had not been summoned by umpires Rob Bailey and Martin Bodenham.


    55-4 and a wicket to Riley. Still 163 runs behind.

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    70-5 (Stevens 3-37). 148 behind.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    75-6 (Stevens 4-38). 143 behind.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    110-7 at lunch and 5 wickets for God (occasionally also known as Stevens).
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    edited June 2014
    LenGlover said:

    Well, well.

    333 from 259-8 so 3 batting points, bowl them out for 115, enforce the follow on and 32-3 at the close!

    This is all unKentlike! What's the catch? Well I make it 15 wickets in the day and I believe the pitch inspector is called if more than 14 wickets fall on either of the first 2 days of a match.

    What's the betting we lose all those bonus points as a deduction for a poor pitch?

    (Sorry it's the Charlton fan in me!)

    The pitch inspectors are indeed coming....." Pitch Liaison Officer David Capel has called for a Pitch Panel to convene at the conclusion of the LV=County Championship match at Canterbury between Kent and Derbyshire. ".......
  • Missed It
    Missed It Posts: 2,734
    The pitch is fine, our last 3 tail-end batsmen managed to rack up 80 runs between them. Derbyshire are just a poor side playing poor shots
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    And they've managed to put on 57 so far for the 8th wicket. If we can get them to say 300 thereby setting us about 80 to win we'll be fine with the Inspectors.

    Only issue then would be whether we could get a 80 in the last innings ;-(
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    170-7 now

    Only good thing, as said, is that it is hard to knock a pitch when numbers 7 and 9 are scoring freely.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    All out 256. Stevens 6-64

    Kent need 39 to win.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,826
    Need 38 to win!
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,740
    Surely even Kent can't feck this up ?????
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    Kent won by 10 wickets!

    Now for the verdict re the pitch.
  • ken_shabby
    ken_shabby Posts: 6,258
    I have to say I'll be upset if we get deducted anything, as we did'nt have too mamy problems ourselves. Just two poor batting sides and for once, we were'nt the worst.
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,740
    LenGlover said:

    Kent won by 10 wickets!

    Now for the verdict re the pitch.

    Fingers crossed, Len.




  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    Pitch inspection panel result is ' below average', no points deduction,on tweet from Jamie Clifford.

    Source: We Are Kent website
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,740
    Phew !!!

    Maybe it's an omen that our season will "start" from hereon in ?
  • Brian
    Brian Posts: 273
    Kent throw it away at Gloucester. Lose off the last ball.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,814
    Intrigued why Stevens only bowled 3 overs (0-14).
  • northstandsteve
    northstandsteve Posts: 14,330
    We are shite, had them at 60-4 piss poor yet again.