Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Everton agree fee for Lookman (ed. Gone)

1…6791112…28

Comments

  • cafc_harry
    cafc_harry Posts: 3,360
    JiMMy 85 said:

    cafc_harry said:

    Bloke on Twitter reckons its off, couldn't agree personal terms.

    That's some source you've cited there. Can't argue with that.
    Hahaha, didn't take it too seriously myself but thought it's worth posting.
  • All_Thaid_Up
    All_Thaid_Up Posts: 2,293
    He probably wants the same as Ali got when he joined Spurs - which is fair enough.

    Ali has subsequently had 2 pay rises since as well
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,746
    edited January 2017
    This is where it could get messy - nothing to do with anything else but other bigger clubs than Everton wanting to gatecrash the deal. These clubs, as we know, have no honour and play as dirty as you get so it is possible. I would advise the lad to sign for Everton. They are the right sort of club for him now. He has shown he makes football decisions and that is the right football decision for him.
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,728
    Is this the reason why CAFC have not signed any new players yet? Need Lookman out before anybody can come in.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,255
    Dansk_Red said:

    Is this the reason why CAFC have not signed any new players yet? Need Lookman out before anybody can come in.

    Could be or could just be waiting for medicals or 100 other hold hold ups.

    No deals are done until they are 100% done.

    WIOTOS
  • Beardface
    Beardface Posts: 1,129
    edited January 2017
    Dansk_Red said:

    Is this the reason why CAFC have not signed any new players yet? Need Lookman out before anybody can come in.

    I'm all for regime bashing or conspiracy theories but I think it's more likely because it's Sunday 1st Jan, the window has been open less than one day and most transfers won't be done on a Sunday, let alone on new years day.

    We've also signed the kid from Chelsea and confirmed Watt is coming back.
  • cafc_harry
    cafc_harry Posts: 3,360
    Henry Irving said:

    Dansk_Red said:

    Is this the reason why CAFC have not signed any new players yet? Need Lookman out before anybody can come in.

    Could be or could just be waiting for medicals or 100 other hold hold ups.

    No deals are done until they are 100% done.

    WIOTOS
    Ketts saying it should be announced tomorrow before the game. Reads like a loan but not confirmed I don't think.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    edited January 2017
    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,006
    ricky_otto said:

    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.

    The new player is from a "big" championship team
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    ross1 said:

    ricky_otto said:

    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.

    The new player is from a "big" championship team
    Good player as well.

  • Sponsored links:



  • cafc_harry
    cafc_harry Posts: 3,360
    ricky_otto said:

    ross1 said:

    ricky_otto said:

    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.

    The new player is from a "big" championship team
    Good player as well.
    Is it Forster Caskey or not then? Surely he would've been announced as back at Brighton by now.
  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,668
    ricky_otto said:

    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.

    Swap the figures around and it would be more believable.
  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,741
    ricky_otto said:

    ross1 said:

    ricky_otto said:

    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.

    The new player is from a "big" championship team
    Good player as well.
    Very nice player.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    Clem_Snide said:

    ricky_otto said:

    ross1 said:

    ricky_otto said:

    I can just see it now:

    Katrien: "we've sold Lookman for £6million and got him back on loan for the rest of the season for a fee of £5m" And then proceed to unveil him on the pitch as a new player.

    The new player is from a "big" championship team
    Good player as well.
    Very nice player.
    Very nice price as well. Very cheap. Best Price.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,480
    Henry Irving said:

    Dansk_Red said:

    Is this the reason why CAFC have not signed any new players yet? Need Lookman out before anybody can come in.

    Could be or could just be waiting for medicals or 100 other hold hold ups.

    No deals are done until they are 100% done.

    WIOTOS
    LOL.

    The OS still thinks Richard Murray works for the club and Tony Kahones doesn't exist.!
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,815
    Does keohane exist?

    This is one for greater philosophers than me.
  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,741
    Alwaysneil said:

    Does keohane exist?

    This is one for greater philosophers than me.

    Everyone knows it's Cajones.
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,121
    JiMMy 85 said:

    cafc_harry said:

    Bloke on Twitter reckons its off, couldn't agree personal terms.

    That's some source you've cited there. Can't argue with that.
    Funny as f***, that'll p*** off the Belgians!
  • cherryorchard
    cherryorchard Posts: 1,722
    killerandflash said:

    se9addick said:

    If it's, say, £4m upfront with a potential £6m in additional payments based on achievements - can Duchatelet contractually oblige Everton to make those additional payments directly to Starpix rather than Charlton ? I.e if he no longer owned Charlton he would still be entitled to the bonus payments ? Is it allowed ?

    It's irrelevant, as if future transfer payments of £6m were due to go elsewhere, then the value of the club when sold would be reduced accordingly. Due diligence would reveal these little tricks
    AFKABartram said:



    I doubt it's too far away from what they turned down from Palace in the summer. That was turned down as Roland's advisers were convinced his valuation was only going in one direction over the next 12-18 months. Perhaps that has been reassessed? Perhaps Lookman is not particularly happy here? Perhaps it's a sign of Roland getting some dividend back out the club?

    Who knows



    It is possible that Katrien turned down Palace as she knew that selling our best player to them would cause riots!     And it was at the end of the window, so no chance of getting a replacement in. At least we have a whole month now...
    I don't think she's that perceptive, in fact, judging by her past actions, she seems to have no insight at all.
  • JoshAddick
    JoshAddick Posts: 1,787
    Guessing by the team he's still struggling with his illness

  • Sponsored links:



  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,811
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,887
    Callumcafc said:

    That's not very gentlemanly to a lady, hope she hit him with her handbag, cheeky Scouser.
  • dwb
    dwb Posts: 137
    Lookman being signed for £11m by Everton according to the BBC website this morning. I'll be amazed if actually get that much!
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,968
    se9addick said:

    dwb said:

    Lookman being signed for £11m by Everton according to the BBC website this morning. I'll be amazed if actually get that much!

    It's £1 upfront and £10,999,999 if Lookman learns to fly around the globe. Solo
    I have added the clause that you missed
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,420
    cafc_harry said:

    Bloke on Twitter reckons its off, couldn't agree personal terms.

    Alwaysneil said:

    And that's probably nonsense.

    Or it could be true!
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,642
    Another club in the mix perhaps ?
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,728
    From Sky:-

    Ademola Lookman is travelling to Merseyside today to undergo a medical ahead of his proposed move to Everton, according to Sky sources.

    We understand the fee for the 19-year-old Charlton winger is in the region of £10m. It is anticipated the deal will go through in the next 24 hours.
  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,902
    If he's travelling up by car, I hope he hasn't become too attached to his hub caps.
  • Its_Hamer_Time
    Its_Hamer_Time Posts: 1,565
    If we get £10m for him then I'll be pleased.......let's hope we can invest some of that cash.

Categories

“Marketplace”