Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New 5 Year Kit Deal With Hummel (Away Kit Revealed, pg.19)

1…2425272930…43

Comments

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,786
    Bizarre way to handle a kit launch...
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    NapaAddick said:

    The CARD shirt has the crest we used just one year. Can't remember when, 1947?

    How would people feel if we used that crest... permanently?

    The robin was not standing on a beach ball in the original. I have a retro shirt with teh old crest, but wouldn't want our current one changed. I have a tatoo of it on my arm for starters and it looks better than the robin too.
  • Nug
    Nug Posts: 4,623
    Callumcafc said:

    Bizarre way to handle a kit launch...

    Kit launch that didn't actually launch it.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    It will be funny if it is the same as the away kit, only red!
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,235
    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    The home kit from 1923, not the away one
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,179
    Looks like the clique have out done themselves this time.

    image
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,236
    Valley11 said:

    Don't know if it's already been posted but CACT showed off their new Hummel kit yesterday. Would be very happy with this for the first team kit.

    Not the home kit.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,786
    I can confirm that the shirt is red and white.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,236
    Ok, had to sign an NDA so because of that and respect for the comms guys not going to say what it looks like and you'll see it tomorrow anyway.

    Marshall, Clarke and Kim Dixon plus another women's team player modelled the home and away kits.

    I liked it, others won't.

    I think they got the history right, the colour right and it's a good KIT not just a good shirt IMSO.

    Nice that they let all the kids (and adults who wanted to) have a pic with it taken by a professional snapper.

    The Museum trustees declined this kind offer.

    All the attendees get a free kit too which I guess I have to donate to the flipping Museum.

  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,946
    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    Synergy. One of the most buzzwordy buzzwords ever. Urgh
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Henry Irving said:

    Ok, had to sign an NDA so because of that and respect for the comms guys not going to say what it looks like and you'll see it tomorrow anyway.

    Marshall, Clarke and Kim Dixon plus another women's team player modelled the home and away kits.

    I liked it, others won't.

    I think they got the history right, the colour right and it's a good KIT not just a good shirt IMSO.

    Nice that they let all the kids (and adults who wanted to) have a pic with it taken by a professional snapper.

    The Museum trustees declined this kind offer.

    All the attendees get a free kit too which I guess I have to donate to the flipping Museum.


    Am I right in saying IMSO is In My Superior Opinion?
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,236
    Swisdom said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Ok, had to sign an NDA so because of that and respect for the comms guys not going to say what it looks like and you'll see it tomorrow anyway.

    Marshall, Clarke and Kim Dixon plus another women's team player modelled the home and away kits.

    I liked it, others won't.

    I think they got the history right, the colour right and it's a good KIT not just a good shirt IMSO.

    Nice that they let all the kids (and adults who wanted to) have a pic with it taken by a professional snapper.

    The Museum trustees declined this kind offer.

    All the attendees get a free kit too which I guess I have to donate to the flipping Museum.


    Am I right in saying IMSO is In My Superior Opinion?
    Of course
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    So are they not going to show the kit to the rest of us until tomorrow then?

    What a strange way to do business. I wonder how many fans will feel alienated enough to decide to let them stick their new kit up there ar$e?
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,127
    cantersaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    Synergy. One of the most buzzwordy buzzwords ever. Urgh
    Spending too much time with Katrien.
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    cantersaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    Synergy. One of the most buzzwordy buzzwords ever. Urgh
    Indeed. It's also doesn't make sense in that paragraph which suggests that either Swisdom doesn't know what it means (which I doubt) or that it was just put in there as a fun buzzword!
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,179
    Henry Irving said:

    Swisdom said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Ok, had to sign an NDA so because of that and respect for the comms guys not going to say what it looks like and you'll see it tomorrow anyway.

    Marshall, Clarke and Kim Dixon plus another women's team player modelled the home and away kits.

    I liked it, others won't.

    I think they got the history right, the colour right and it's a good KIT not just a good shirt IMSO.

    Nice that they let all the kids (and adults who wanted to) have a pic with it taken by a professional snapper.

    The Museum trustees declined this kind offer.

    All the attendees get a free kit too which I guess I have to donate to the flipping Museum.


    Am I right in saying IMSO is In My Superior Opinion?
    Of course
    I thought it stood for sanctimonious.

    ;-)
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    kings hill addick said:

    cantersaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    Synergy. One of the most buzzwordy buzzwords ever. Urgh
    Indeed. It's also doesn't make sense in that paragraph which suggests that either Swisdom doesn't know what it means (which I doubt) or that it was just put in there as a fun buzzword!

    Lighten up peeps - It's just for funsies

    This kit realease is being taken far too seriously by some people
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,001
    Including the club

  • Sponsored links:



  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    What happens to you if you breach the NDA? Do they give you a season ticket?
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    Swisdom said:

    kings hill addick said:

    cantersaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    Synergy. One of the most buzzwordy buzzwords ever. Urgh
    Indeed. It's also doesn't make sense in that paragraph which suggests that either Swisdom doesn't know what it means (which I doubt) or that it was just put in there as a fun buzzword!

    Lighten up peeps - It's just for funsies

    This kit realease is being taken far too seriously by some people
    I did assume you were having a bit of fun, and I said as much.

    AFKA's right. They are making more fuss with shirt release than the signing of players. Anyone would think that we have no more players coming and that KM thinks we won't notice if they make a big song and dance about a shirt that we will wear for nine months before they change it again!
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    I admit - the launch has been.....different this year

    Not sure why it's been the way it has. I think there's merit in the odd teaser but this has been treated in a most peculiar fashion
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    The children's kit will look nice on Jay DaSilva tomorrow though
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    I think it all comes back to KM and RD's desire to 'prove' that going to football is not, really, about the football and the results.

    They have, in my view, completely missed the point but that has never stopped them before.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,001
    kings hill addick said:

    Swisdom said:

    kings hill addick said:

    cantersaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    I've said this a few times but I've been told it's a very nice kid with a lot of nice touches to it. I can't see it being the same as the CACT kit

    I like the fact that the away kit mirrors our original away kit from 1923 which also happens to be the year Hummel were formed. Nice bit of synergy

    Not long to go though.....we'll see it soon enough

    Synergy. One of the most buzzwordy buzzwords ever. Urgh
    Indeed. It's also doesn't make sense in that paragraph which suggests that either Swisdom doesn't know what it means (which I doubt) or that it was just put in there as a fun buzzword!

    Lighten up peeps - It's just for funsies

    This kit realease is being taken far too seriously by some people
    I did assume you were having a bit of fun, and I said as much.

    AFKA's right. They are making more fuss with shirt release than the signing of players. Anyone would think that we have no more players coming and that KM thinks we won't notice if they make a big song and dance about a shirt that we will wear for nine months before they change it again!
    Once again, everything feels out of whack. No keeper but loads of effort put into a clandestine kit launch.
    #priorities
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    Well I'm going to bed - hopefully I can sleep with all the suspense of not knowing what it looks like.
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well I'm going to bed - hopefully I can sleep with all the suspense of not knowing what it looks like.

    Just one more sleep Muttley!
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,164
    Swisdom said:

    I admit - the launch has been.....different this year

    Not sure why it's been the way it has. I think there's merit in the odd teaser but this has been treated in a most peculiar fashion

    Can't you just come out and say it's been a bit wanky and weird like the ownership .......
    No I thought not

Categories

“Marketplace”