22/8/18: CARD CALLS FLEETWOOD PROTEST IN SOLIDARITY WITH CHARLTON STAFF
Comments
-
Cant make the game. Wishing CARD every success and would be delighted if some of the more militant got the game called off too1
-
I can tie a reef knot (with some tuition).1
-
Go on then. Step up the campaign yourself. Get off your arse and do something.DICKIE PLUMB said:Well done CARD - not.
We are now in a situation where the fortunes of the club are in freefall. No shock there.
Now, I hate Millwall as much as most Charlton fans but have to say that if they were in our position they would have got it sorted by now, either by fair means or foul. In my opinion CARD's actions have just made matters worse.
All CARD's pathetic efforts have done is to tweak the tiger's tail so that Roland is so pissed off he is not going to sell and, I fear, is prepared to let the club fall into the abyss. Relegation is a real possibility and then who knows?
Trouble is that Charlton is such a small part of Roland's portfolio he can afford to let us die out of spite - and is likely to do so.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
Maybe time to step up the campaign so that Roland is either ENCOURAGED to sell or, alternatively, to build some bridges before it is too late.
Either way, make no mistake, Charlton's very survival is at stake.
Of course, we could order some more plastic piggies to REALLY show Roland who is boss!
What have you actually done? From all I can see it's just periodically come on here and moan about CARD not doing enough whilst not doing anything yourself. Boring.5 -
Let's manage some expectations here. The reality is that, with this protest called at very short notice in response to "Bonusgate" quite a lot of fans who would have loved to come and protest just won't be able to make it. And the timelines are too tight for CARD to organise their usual throwables, placards etc. In an organised sense, this is about getting as many fans as possible, boycotters and attenders, to come and demonstrate their support for Charlton staff and their disgust at Duchatelet's scrooge like actions.
But, as others have already said, there is a lot of scope to cause disruption inside the ground. Like minded people can group together, with their own banners, throwables, whistles etc, and cause a bit of havoc. Just organise it amongst your own groups. Speaking personally, and not for CARD, whilst we have previously only ever sought to delay and mildly disrupt a game I feel we are quickly getting to the stage where we need to do something more drastic to force the issue. If that means getting a game abandoned, so be it. If not on Saturday, that day is fast approaching.16 -
What if at 10 to 3, the referee got an anonymous tip off that drawing pins had been thrown on the pitch?
Would they believe it or take a chance?7 -
Doing, saying anything about the potential for injury is unacceptable imo. Let's not lower ourselves to level of the 'security' team.creepyaddick said:What if at 10 to 3, the referee got an anonymous tip off that drawing pins had been thrown on the pitch?
Would they believe it or take a chance?15 -
I doubt it. I'm 63. Are you Methusaleh?RedChaser said:
Where's your sense of humour? Lighten up, anyway I'm probably old enough to be your Dad!iainment said:
Grow up.RedChaser said:
Good use of the question mark Iainiainment said:
Maybe us who are not going in could meet for a drink and a chat?Wilma said:
I've previously attended protest activities and then gone back home again. It's not a nice feeling to walk away before the match but sometimes it has to be done.Lurker said:I'm sure there's a balance between getting people interested and the club out of he loop, but what should someone who's not bought a ST do? Turn up for 45 minutes and go home?
Are there staff with the appetite to get the game postponed? To get larger numbers there, the boycotters need to turn up, and I doubt they will to just go home at 3pm.
Rose of Denmark anyone?
.5 -
Chaser has 20 years on you.iainment said:
I doubt it. I'm 63. Are you Methusaleh?RedChaser said:
Where's your sense of humour? Lighten up, anyway I'm probably old enough to be your Dad!iainment said:
Grow up.RedChaser said:
Good use of the question mark Iainiainment said:
Maybe us who are not going in could meet for a drink and a chat?Wilma said:
I've previously attended protest activities and then gone back home again. It's not a nice feeling to walk away before the match but sometimes it has to be done.Lurker said:I'm sure there's a balance between getting people interested and the club out of he loop, but what should someone who's not bought a ST do? Turn up for 45 minutes and go home?
Are there staff with the appetite to get the game postponed? To get larger numbers there, the boycotters need to turn up, and I doubt they will to just go home at 3pm.
Rose of Denmark anyone? .1 -
Just a youngster then, thought so.iainment said:
I doubt it. I'm 63. Are you Methusaleh?RedChaser said:
Where's your sense of humour? Lighten up, anyway I'm probably old enough to be your Dad!iainment said:
Grow up.RedChaser said:
Good use of the question mark Iainiainment said:
Maybe us who are not going in could meet for a drink and a chat?Wilma said:
I've previously attended protest activities and then gone back home again. It's not a nice feeling to walk away before the match but sometimes it has to be done.Lurker said:I'm sure there's a balance between getting people interested and the club out of he loop, but what should someone who's not bought a ST do? Turn up for 45 minutes and go home?
Are there staff with the appetite to get the game postponed? To get larger numbers there, the boycotters need to turn up, and I doubt they will to just go home at 3pm.
Rose of Denmark anyone? .4 -
Sponsored links:
-
Would it not be more beneficial for CARD to fund the staff of Charlton and get a top lawyer to expose the wrong doings of the owner and breaking a contractual agreement. This would get more exposure within the national press as well as the EFL rather than demonstrate to someone whom is in a completely different country.
By taking him to court it would cost him personally a fortune, damage his business credibility but more importantly get the monies owed to the staff.7 -
Too much passive aggressive use of “Eltham” on this thread for my liking!Goonerhater said:dont mention flames and fire chief it gets Toms from Eltham trousers tightening
0 -
WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
Would it not be more beneficial for CARD to fund the staff of Charlton and get a top lawyer to expose the wrong doings of the owner and breaking a contractual agreement. This would get more exposure within the national press as well as the EFL rather than demonstrate to someone whom is in a completely different country.
By taking him to court it would cost him personally a fortune, damage his business credibility but more importantly get the monies owed to the staff.Davo55 said:A few people have mentioned the idea of some kind of financial support to help the Charlton staff in their fight to get what's owed to them.
Obviously, details are sketchy at this stage. We don't know the structure of the bonus scheme, the detail in the "small print", the numbers of staff affected or the amounts involved. Even when all this is known, we don't know whether the staff concerned will want to pursue a claim at an employment tribunal or any other legal route.
However, @Curb_It and I have now ring-fenced £1000 of the protest fund to be used to help with any initial legal or other related expenses that may be incurred. In the event that additional funds are required, we envisage that a separate support fund will be set up and donations sought.
The question of whether there is a sound basis for a legal challenge remains to be answered. But whatever the answer to this, there can surely be no doubt that Charlton are under a moral obligation to pay these staff what's due. I am sure that many fans, whether boycotting or not, will get behind any action that is proposed to get a successful and just outcome for the Charlton staff.2 -
Agree with the bit about Millwall. They would of actually done something about this by now, Dont think it would involve throwing rubbish on the pitch though...DICKIE PLUMB said:Well done CARD - not.
We are now in a situation where the fortunes of the club are in freefall. No shock there.
Now, I hate Millwall as much as most Charlton fans but have to say that if they were in our position they would have got it sorted by now, either by fair means or foul. In my opinion CARD's actions have just made matters worse.
All CARD's pathetic efforts have done is to tweak the tiger's tail so that Roland is so pissed off he is not going to sell and, I fear, is prepared to let the club fall into the abyss. Relegation is a real possibility and then who knows?
Trouble is that Charlton is such a small part of Roland's portfolio he can afford to let us die out of spite - and is likely to do so.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
Maybe time to step up the campaign so that Roland is either ENCOURAGED to sell or, alternatively, to build some bridges before it is too late.
Either way, make no mistake, Charlton's very survival is at stake.
Of course, we could order some more plastic piggies to REALLY show Roland who is boss!0 -
Really? So what would they have done differently which would have resulted in Duchatelet being gone by now?redbuttle said:
Agree with the bit about Millwall. They would of actually done something about this by now, Dont think it would involve throwing rubbish on the pitch though...DICKIE PLUMB said:Well done CARD - not.
We are now in a situation where the fortunes of the club are in freefall. No shock there.
Now, I hate Millwall as much as most Charlton fans but have to say that if they were in our position they would have got it sorted by now, either by fair means or foul. In my opinion CARD's actions have just made matters worse.
All CARD's pathetic efforts have done is to tweak the tiger's tail so that Roland is so pissed off he is not going to sell and, I fear, is prepared to let the club fall into the abyss. Relegation is a real possibility and then who knows?
Trouble is that Charlton is such a small part of Roland's portfolio he can afford to let us die out of spite - and is likely to do so.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
Maybe time to step up the campaign so that Roland is either ENCOURAGED to sell or, alternatively, to build some bridges before it is too late.
Either way, make no mistake, Charlton's very survival is at stake.
Of course, we could order some more plastic piggies to REALLY show Roland who is boss!
Nothing would have changed his stance.1 -
Harsh gazza. Very harshElfsborgAddick said:
Chaser has 20 years on you.iainment said:
I doubt it. I'm 63. Are you Methusaleh?RedChaser said:
Where's your sense of humour? Lighten up, anyway I'm probably old enough to be your Dad!iainment said:
Grow up.RedChaser said:
Good use of the question mark Iainiainment said:
Maybe us who are not going in could meet for a drink and a chat?Wilma said:
I've previously attended protest activities and then gone back home again. It's not a nice feeling to walk away before the match but sometimes it has to be done.Lurker said:I'm sure there's a balance between getting people interested and the club out of he loop, but what should someone who's not bought a ST do? Turn up for 45 minutes and go home?
Are there staff with the appetite to get the game postponed? To get larger numbers there, the boycotters need to turn up, and I doubt they will to just go home at 3pm.
Rose of Denmark anyone? .1 -
Not so sure - with the threat to their ground by Lewisham Council, they resorted to ... articles in the Guardian and running a very unsuccessful candidate against Heidi Alexander. Both of those have been done already (albeit ROT's election is later this year).redbuttle said:
Agree with the bit about Millwall. They would of actually done something about this by now, Dont think it would involve throwing rubbish on the pitch though...DICKIE PLUMB said:Well done CARD - not.
We are now in a situation where the fortunes of the club are in freefall. No shock there.
Now, I hate Millwall as much as most Charlton fans but have to say that if they were in our position they would have got it sorted by now, either by fair means or foul. In my opinion CARD's actions have just made matters worse.
All CARD's pathetic efforts have done is to tweak the tiger's tail so that Roland is so pissed off he is not going to sell and, I fear, is prepared to let the club fall into the abyss. Relegation is a real possibility and then who knows?
Trouble is that Charlton is such a small part of Roland's portfolio he can afford to let us die out of spite - and is likely to do so.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
Maybe time to step up the campaign so that Roland is either ENCOURAGED to sell or, alternatively, to build some bridges before it is too late.
Either way, make no mistake, Charlton's very survival is at stake.
Of course, we could order some more plastic piggies to REALLY show Roland who is boss!4 -
They would have done plenty by now, though the vast majority of it probably would not be legal!stonemuse said:
Really? So what would they have done differently which would have resulted in Duchatelet being gone by now?redbuttle said:
Agree with the bit about Millwall. They would of actually done something about this by now, Dont think it would involve throwing rubbish on the pitch though...DICKIE PLUMB said:Well done CARD - not.
We are now in a situation where the fortunes of the club are in freefall. No shock there.
Now, I hate Millwall as much as most Charlton fans but have to say that if they were in our position they would have got it sorted by now, either by fair means or foul. In my opinion CARD's actions have just made matters worse.
All CARD's pathetic efforts have done is to tweak the tiger's tail so that Roland is so pissed off he is not going to sell and, I fear, is prepared to let the club fall into the abyss. Relegation is a real possibility and then who knows?
Trouble is that Charlton is such a small part of Roland's portfolio he can afford to let us die out of spite - and is likely to do so.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
Maybe time to step up the campaign so that Roland is either ENCOURAGED to sell or, alternatively, to build some bridges before it is too late.
Either way, make no mistake, Charlton's very survival is at stake.
Of course, we could order some more plastic piggies to REALLY show Roland who is boss!
Nothing would have changed his stance.1 -
What do you suggest? I am sure CARD would love to hear.DICKIE PLUMB said:Well done CARD - not.
We are now in a situation where the fortunes of the club are in freefall. No shock there.
Now, I hate Millwall as much as most Charlton fans but have to say that if they were in our position they would have got it sorted by now, either by fair means or foul. In my opinion CARD's actions have just made matters worse.
All CARD's pathetic efforts have done is to tweak the tiger's tail so that Roland is so pissed off he is not going to sell and, I fear, is prepared to let the club fall into the abyss. Relegation is a real possibility and then who knows?
Trouble is that Charlton is such a small part of Roland's portfolio he can afford to let us die out of spite - and is likely to do so.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
Maybe time to step up the campaign so that Roland is either ENCOURAGED to sell or, alternatively, to build some bridges before it is too late.
Either way, make no mistake, Charlton's very survival is at stake.
Of course, we could order some more plastic piggies to REALLY show Roland who is boss!
1 -
They would’ve done what standard done and stormed the old cnuts offices and Implied in a very polite way explaining that him and his family are very able to be reached
Seemed to work at Leige1 -
Sponsored links:
-
And would have all got a knock and court appearance and the repercussions that come with that. In the UK in this day and age posting frustrations on a feckin football forum is evidently enough to have the police involved...guaranteed if people went through more forceful approaches it would have had even worse implications for those who did it. Most of us, and probably all but the most mouth breathing of Millwall supporters wouldn't put themselves through that if being truly honest.nth london addick said:They would’ve done what standard done and stormed the old cnuts offices and Implied in a very polite way explaining that him and his family are very able to be reached
Seemed to work at Leige
That's why you are left with the actions that have been taken.
A lot of vocal critics of protests who cite this (not you mate) have probably done fuck all in terms of real action over past few years, let alone storm the catastrophic fool's office.11 -
There are certain 'pinch points' when staging a football match, the referee is one of them.2
-
I've said this before, but I would be interested to see the actual contract the staff were giveWhenIwasLittleBoy said:Would it not be more beneficial for CARD to fund the staff of Charlton and get a top lawyer to expose the wrong doings of the owner and breaking a contractual agreement. This would get more exposure within the national press as well as the EFL rather than demonstrate to someone whom is in a completely different country.
By taking him to court it would cost him personally a fortune, damage his business credibility but more importantly get the monies owed to the staff.
If there's ANY get out clause in the wording, then the staff would lose a court case, it would be a waste of everyone's time, and they might be liable for costs etc
This is separate from the MORAL issue of course0 -
Basically I agree with an any action that is anti Roland. My worry would be the late call to arms here which, as Davo admits, means some of the resources and planning that have been behind many of the more successful protests won’t be in place.
Nevertheless, good luck to everybody who attends on Saturday.0 -
NLA: If you feel warm breath on the back of your neck and someone whispering in your ear "please come home, I forgive you" you will know cabbles has not read this.nth london addick said:50 and you can’t get nicked any less and you can
I am sure we can do a roll call off line so they don’t know what faces to look out for
This Belgian fucka needs to know enough is enough no game is safe to be finished home or away whilst he is here and to force his hand to realise holding out for an amount of money most think is far too high is one thing to not pay people and to not give the youth team food or drink and no water at the training ground is another
I am sure tony no chaones has a picture of mine on his desk so I will come dressed as Katrien6 -
Is it not likely that between the entire group of staff they would have noticed and understood such a caveat? Is it not likely that in seeking professional advice it will be pointed out to them if they haven’t?killerandflash said:
I've said this before, but I would be interested to see the actual contract the staff were giveWhenIwasLittleBoy said:Would it not be more beneficial for CARD to fund the staff of Charlton and get a top lawyer to expose the wrong doings of the owner and breaking a contractual agreement. This would get more exposure within the national press as well as the EFL rather than demonstrate to someone whom is in a completely different country.
By taking him to court it would cost him personally a fortune, damage his business credibility but more importantly get the monies owed to the staff.
If there's ANY get out clause in the wording, then the staff would lose a court case, it would be a waste of everyone's time, and they might be liable for costs etc
This is separate from the MORAL issue of course
I had all this garbage about costs and the dim view the judge would take from Slater and co six years ago. I ran rings round them in the formal process without paying a penny in costs to anyone because they had no case and even the one they put together was full of mistakes and misunderstandings. There is nothing to fear in going to a tribunal.5 -
But not separate from working to rule.killerandflash said:
I've said this before, but I would be interested to see the actual contract the staff were giveWhenIwasLittleBoy said:Would it not be more beneficial for CARD to fund the staff of Charlton and get a top lawyer to expose the wrong doings of the owner and breaking a contractual agreement. This would get more exposure within the national press as well as the EFL rather than demonstrate to someone whom is in a completely different country.
By taking him to court it would cost him personally a fortune, damage his business credibility but more importantly get the monies owed to the staff.
If there's ANY get out clause in the wording, then the staff would lose a court case, it would be a waste of everyone's time, and they might be liable for costs etc
This is separate from the MORAL issue of course2 -
This will play out as it will play out but I doubt the staff will be going to the lengths of issuing open letters to the owner, their ultimate employer, unless they believe they have a very good case, and we aren't talking just one or two people from what I understand.
For me it boils down to stupidity, short sightedness and frankly idiotic to cause themselves such issues for what is relatively a small sum of money, a point I made (I hope very strongly) last night to them. You are only as good as your team so to disenfranchise them like this is crazy (before you get onto the less easy to add up the reputational damage at a time they are trying to sell a loss making entity, fan uproar etc etc).
This is a pure guess and I've probably gone toppy with the numbers but it highlights the point;
Lets say it's 25 people on an average of £30k (allowing for on cost) - so salary pot is £750k, even if they all get a 10% bonus that's £75k.
The club are losing/RD is funding what, £1m a month, but lets say £800k now the lights get turned off/£9.6m per annum. That's circa a loss of £26k a day, so we are talking an additional three days of loss or less than 1%.
I'm sure that all fell on deaf ears but hopefully I got my point across, particularly that they have a finite time to sort this out before it goes past the point of no return.
Sometimes I just don't fathom people's rationale, stupid doesn't even begin to do it justice.
8 -
A thread from Jimmy Stone on twitter which is well worth a read. Unfortunately as I can’t access twitter on my work pc I don’t have time to copy it all over.
7 -
......If you are in the right and you know it.Airman Brown said:
Is it not likely that between the entire group of staff they would have noticed and understood such a caveat? Is it not likely that in seeking professional advice it will be pointed out to them if they haven’t?killerandflash said:
I've said this before, but I would be interested to see the actual contract the staff were giveWhenIwasLittleBoy said:Would it not be more beneficial for CARD to fund the staff of Charlton and get a top lawyer to expose the wrong doings of the owner and breaking a contractual agreement. This would get more exposure within the national press as well as the EFL rather than demonstrate to someone whom is in a completely different country.
By taking him to court it would cost him personally a fortune, damage his business credibility but more importantly get the monies owed to the staff.
If there's ANY get out clause in the wording, then the staff would lose a court case, it would be a waste of everyone's time, and they might be liable for costs etc
This is separate from the MORAL issue of course
I had all this garbage about costs and the dim view the judge would take from Slater and co six years ago. I ran rings round them in the formal process without paying a penny in costs to anyone because they had no case and even the one they put together was full of mistakes and misunderstandings. There is nothing to fear in going to a tribunal.1
