Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Yeah looks that way... Time for TS to pay people offKentishAddick said:I can see this going to trial. Disaster for the club.1 -
Oh f**k. This judge sounds like he is going to take the conservative route and propose a “speedy trial” by November.5
-
Judge in being a prick shocker11
-
Hope his pockets are deepForeverAddickted said:
Yeah looks that way... Time for TS to pay people offKentishAddick said:I can see this going to trial. Disaster for the club.0 -
He's beginning to indicate that......KentishAddick said:I can see this going to trial. Disaster for the club.1 -
This judge will grant a trial0
-
Judge Richard Pearce feels the case could be tried in November. "I doubt the necessary procedural steps could be taken for October. I'd have thought allowing for six weeks and speedy witness and limited disclosure the case could reach a stage to be tried in November."0
-
Nervous last few minutes.....squeak bum time0
-
There was no detail about it in the submitted evidenceAddicktion said:Why doesn't the judge know about TS sale? It might not be imminent but its far along to be of significance?0 -
Think we may be hitting the wall now where judge is not a football fan and knows and cares nothing about players, transfers, embargoes and squad strength;Kreamer: A further urgency to take into consideration is that the season starts in 11 days. While these various issues are not resolved the club is not able to buy players. If the matter can't be resolved till Nov, that's not enough time for #cafc to buy players.0
- Sponsored links:
-
What? LK has clearly pointed out the club could cease to exist.se9addick said:
Definitely looking this way.se9addick said:I think the injunction will be granted so that it can go to full trial.Elliott’s lawyer has been able to create enough doubt around the ownership to (in the judges mind) justify a trial.Don’t think we’ve been able to show any imminent harm to the club/ESI should the injunction be granted and a full trial initiated.1 -
Hope he swerves at last minute and says trial but no injunction.12
-
Seems like the judge really wants a trial. Does not seem to get the risks.0
-
To be honest, MM made that likely. What a plank.2
-
Makes sense to not grant an injunction and let Panorama and Lex Dominus battle it out for damages at court... Both want to maximise profit on a sale so it doesn't make a difference who sells if a court are going to decide who are due the money anyway3
-
THAT is the fairest outcomeRedrobo said:Hope he swerves at last minute and says trial but no injunction.2 -
Any sort of delay means our transfer embargo remains.
Come on EFL just say Elllliotttt will never pass your test and lift the embargo.2 -
Trial odds on. Mihail and EFL screwed us.2
-
I might be misreading what the LK is saying, but it seems the argument is that if it is allowed to go to trial then there's no need for an injunction - i.e. the sale to Sandgaard can go ahead.KentishAddick said:I can see this going to trial. Disaster for the club.0 -
We is fecked!0
- Sponsored links:
-
Seems from my bias perspective that esi 2 gave nothing of note in their argument and just were clambering for a postponement. Surely any judge should see through this especially when LK has done such a good job0
-
Didn't TS say it could be done by Wednesday?ForeverAddickted said:Judge reckons there is no immient takeover so doesn't matter about season starting soon
Yeah because this is all to let TS know who he should be dealing with surely0 -
Don't believe he can't come to a decision after listen to that. ffs4
-
Probably by design in my opinion.MuttleyCAFC said:To be honest, MM made that likely. What a plank.
He's one of them don't forget.1 -
We are the can everybody wants to kick down the road.
Someone grow a pair of bollocks!10 -
November isn't speedy. We have a transfer embargo and won't be able to strengthen until the next window. That is if we exist by then with a buyer waiting to buy us and two bunches of crooks fighting over who owns us.3
-
Yes - but how is that shown? What basis is that on?AddicksAddict said:
What? LK has clearly pointed out the club could cease to exist.se9addick said:
Definitely looking this way.se9addick said:I think the injunction will be granted so that it can go to full trial.Elliott’s lawyer has been able to create enough doubt around the ownership to (in the judges mind) justify a trial.Don’t think we’ve been able to show any imminent harm to the club/ESI should the injunction be granted and a full trial initiated.0 -
It could I imagine but the judge doesn't know thatCAFCsayer said:
Didn't TS say it could be done by Wednesday?ForeverAddickted said:Judge reckons there is no immient takeover so doesn't matter about season starting soon
Yeah because this is all to let TS know who he should be dealing with surely1 -
Judge bottling it just like the EFL. how do these pricks get in to positions of power.0
-
MM didn't indicate that was the case at all.0
This discussion has been closed.
