Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
I think its quite likely they will go to the Court of Appeal, I see little reason for them not to.
At worst, the sale goes through before they get the chance and their position remains the same in having to look for damages. At best, it gives a chance at injunction.
Does mean higher legal fees, that's the only big question mark considering they haven't yet paid the £1 Lex Dominus spent on the club.0 -
Just hope that the Judge doesnt let them have a seven day injunction!!WattsTheMatter said:I think its quite likely they will go to the Court of Appeal, I see little reason for them not to.
At worst, the sale goes through before they get the chance and their position remains the same in having to look for damages. At best, it gives a chance at injunction.
Does mean higher legal fees, that's the only big question mark considering they haven't yet paid the £1 Lex Dominus spent on the club.2 -
Kashashy now on hold after that decision hahaha3
-
Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to fund bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution?5
-
Surely he can't give them a 7 day restraint. Please.3
-
I don't normally have a lot of time for judges.
But I'm loving him.1 -
If the judge says no, that may suggest it is very close to happeningKentishAddick said:Surely he can't give them a 7 day restraint. Please.0 -
There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick.roseandcrown said:i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it.
CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence.
However, LK noted in yesterday's proceedings that there appears to be a clear conflict of interest for Mr Farnell, who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings.
All in all, bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about LK.16 -
Can't see him granting that, it's the same as an injunction pretty much2
- Sponsored links:
-
If it goes to the Court of Appeal then Chaisty gets a few more days of billable work - an understandable motivation that I'm sure he'd deny. Meanwhile PE racks up more legal costs that he has little chance of recovering. Indeed if he persists in using Chaisty and Panorama Magic continue to have access to Lauren's time PE has every chance of forking the bill for his own and Panorama's legal costs.
How long before we see Lex Dominus chasing IPS Law for compensation?0 -
The guy is teflon. Buys a club for a quid. Gets someone else to pay the wages and then walks away with 2 mil.se9addick said:Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to finer bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution?0 -
Chaisty asking for an injunction to restrain dealing of shares for "a matter of a few days".
0 -
And what then after a few days1
-
A big weakness in the argument for a 7 day freeze, is that in arguments yesterday, Chaisty argued there was no evidence of an imminent sale. What benefit exists therefore for a temporary freeze if nothing is imminent?4
-
Chaisty concerned that even a short delay in getting leave to appeal might mean #cafc could be sold to @SandgaardThomas before that.
0 -
Which would be annoying but pretty minor compared to November...ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty asking for an injunction to restrain dealing of shares for "a matter of a few days".1 -
Yeah should be turned down seeing that Chaisty went with the argument yesterday that a takeover wasnt imminentWattsTheMatter said:A big weakness in the argument for a 7 day freeze, is that in arguments yesterday, Chaisty argued there was no evidence of an imminent sale. What benefit exists therefore for a temporary freeze if nothing is imminent?1 -
100% agree with that view. Makes you wonder why LK stepped down from CAST if (legally) there cannot be a conflict of interest. Maybe she was just being ultra cautious ("whiter than white")PeanutsMolloy said:
There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick.roseandcrown said:i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it.
CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence.
There are however MULTIPLE conflicts of interest for Mr Farnell who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings - bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about it.
2 - Sponsored links:
-
I hate this guy....just piss offForeverAddickted said:Chaisty concerned that even a short delay in getting leave to appeal might mean #cafc could be sold to @SandgaardThomas before that.2 -
So he's now brought up Thomas Sandgaard as an imminent owner, but why should a judge overturn his own decision (that he has made twice) to allow Elliott to go over his head to the court of appeal1
-
Still frustrating as stops Bowyer from bringing in these five / six players that he mentioned last nightkillerandflash said:
Which would be annoying but pretty minor compared to November...ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty asking for an injunction to restrain dealing of shares for "a matter of a few days".3 -
I've found a recent case where there was an appeal against a refusal to grant an interim injunction (medical patent case).
3 June 2020 - interim injunction refused
18 June 2020 - hearing before court of appeal (unclear when permission was granted). Appeal failed
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/793.html
If Thomas does get his skates on and gets the deal through this week, we should be OK whatever4 -
Last hurdle, this is it1
-
Just fuck off you pain in the arse1
-
Chaisty clutching to straws now, trying to get the judge to google Charlton Athletic?0
-
Pearce saying he hasn't seen the material in the public domain. Chaisty saying easy to see reports of Sandgaard being in the country to try and do a deal. Pearce asking to be pointed to a certain website.
Judge says he hasn’t seen material in public domain re @SandgaardThomas and wonders if he should be. Chaisty suggests that he Googles it. Judge not keen.
1 -
Why didnt Chaisty take this approach yesterday?1
-
Chaisty getting impatient..
1
This discussion has been closed.
