Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…9394969899…175

Comments

  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    🤞🏻Cmon Pearcy...do the right thing please...just fuck these cretins off
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    Asking for a cheeky injunction the day after not getting an injunction. Doesn't sound like the judge is too impressed with this line of argument
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,841
    Do court cases normally involve a QC asking the judge to google something?
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    We're so close and in typical Charlton fashion I can see it going wrong at the last moment.
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Pearce saying he hasn't seen the material in the public domain. Chaisty saying easy to see reports of Sandgaard being in the country to try and do a deal. Pearce asking to be pointed to a certain website.

    Judge says he hasn’t seen material in public domain re @SandgaardThomas and wonders if he should be. Chaisty suggests that he Googles it. Judge not keen.
    Shit! No-one mention Charltonlife or Ali-Wibble to anyone!!
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Why didnt Chaisty take this approach yesterday?
    Because he is so arrogant that he thought it was in the bag. 
  • Lordflashheart
    Lordflashheart Posts: 5,619
    Chaisty has shot himself in the foot by saying one thing yesterday and the opposite today !!
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    se9addick said:
    Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to fund  bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution? 
    Yup and people call him thick...... 
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,732
    KentishAddick said:
    We're so close and in typical Charlton fashion I can see it going wrong at the last moment.
    Of course it will . This is Charlton 
  • RedJohn
    RedJohn Posts: 597
    If Judge googles he will see TS everywhere, how will this affect anything
  • Sponsored links:



  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,300
    killerandflash said:
    Do court cases normally involve a QC asking the judge to google something?
    Suppose its helping that the Judge is at home
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,300
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989
    Rob7Lee said:
    Appeal not granted.
    Boooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
  • kentred2
    kentred2 Posts: 2,335
    So he said no injunction yesterday. He said no appeal today. And now he’s being asked for a short injunction so they can appeal. 
    HE MUST SAY NO! or look stupid. 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,218
    edited September 2020
    PeanutsMolloy said:
    roseandcrown said:
    i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it. 
    There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick.
    CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence.
    There are however MULTIPLE conflicts of interest for Mr Farnell who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings - bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about it.
    Kvetch.  Not a word we hear enough of @PeanutsMolloy   One for @SE7toSG3

    Along with pyrrhic and draconian from their QC.
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,559
    ForeverAddickted said:
    killerandflash said:
    Do court cases normally involve a QC asking the judge to google something?
    Suppose its helping that the Judge is at home
    ah, explains why he didn't close early yesterday to slope off for a G & T ...
  • fadgadget
    fadgadget Posts: 1,391
    Jints said:
    My understanding (solicitor but not in this field). First a request for permission to appeal has to be made to Pearce - that's what they are doing today. Usually these get refused unless there is a clear point of law which the judge thinks important enough to go to the Court of Appeal . 

    If refused, an application for permission to appeal is made to the Court of Appeal. It is considered by a single judge on the papers. If refused, in some circumstances the appellant can ask for a short hearing about the permission. If permission is granted then the hearing goes ahead in front of three judges. 

    What I'm not sure about is timelines on injunctions. I have a case which my side won. The other side was refused permission from the original court but got permission from the Court of Appeal. That took about 6 weeks. The hearing won't take place for more than a year because the Court of Appeal is so backed up. 

    I guess they could apply for an emergency interim injunction from the CoA but I would have thought you would need a really important high profile case to get that fast tracked. 
    You can do a emergency interim application to the COA over the phone, 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,622
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Unlike London, Manchester could take trial in November so in order to achieve a speedy trial strong argument to hold it in Manchester. Declines transfer.
    Another embargo.....😆
  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    Thought jurors are told,do not be influenced in what they see or read in the news...so why not the Judges also...??
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,300
    ricky_otto said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Why didnt Chaisty take this approach yesterday?
    Because he is so arrogant that he thought it was in the bag. 
    Judge should ask him why he went with the opposite line yesterday if this is the case
  • Sponsored links:



  • CL_Phantom
    CL_Phantom Posts: 5,512
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Why didnt Chaisty take this approach yesterday?
    Because yesterday's game was to spend 80 mins carrying out a character assassination on Mihail, which tbf, worked, opinions and influence can matter and sway decisions in court. 

  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,300
    Chaisty now directing to Football League World. "i'm sure there are others."

    Yeah why ignore more reliable sites...
  • mattinfinland
    mattinfinland Posts: 1,096
    Reports of Sandgaard being close is pure speculation.. Not any actual proof
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty now directing to Football League World. "i'm sure there are others."

    Yeah why ignore more reliable sites...

    Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    mattinfinland said:
    Reports of Sandgaard being close is pure speculation.. Not any actual proof
    agreed
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    ForeverAddickted said:
    ricky_otto said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Why didnt Chaisty take this approach yesterday?
    Because he is so arrogant that he thought it was in the bag. 
    Judge should ask him why he went with the opposite line yesterday if this is the case

    This. He is asking the judge to google but TS was in the country before yesterday. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,300
    Football League World just lift off other sites - funny they have been mentioned!
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,347
    mattinfinland said:
    Reports of Sandgaard being close is pure speculation.. Not any actual proof
    He actually said this yesterday. "Pure media speculation" and no actual evidence

    How he's using the media speculation as evidence
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,300
    The judge is looking at Football League World. It's basically the quotes from Marian Mihail which initially were on the club website earlier today.

    Judge looking at webpage from Football League World - not an original source!
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,457
    "Put phonecall into Acworth m'lud" pleads Chaisty!
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”