Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Euro 2020 Thread
Comments
-
I think you might be seeing what you want to see there!letthegoodtimesroll said:So now we’ve seen all the teams, the one thing that kept coming to mind is that, apart from England, all the other teams looked like they’ve haven’t played a game for a couple of months and had only just met up with their teammates. There seems to be a lot of flat footed players in every team being too slow off the mark, balls played into areas in the expectation that a player will run into the space that didn’t happen, and untold number of interceptions of passes that didn’t have a chance of getting to the player it was intended for in the first place. Yes, there were 3 English clubs in the two European finals but most of those players wouldn’t have been English so that doesn’t explain why England looked, IMO, a few weeks further down the line in a tournament of teams still in pre-season match fitness. Weather could have explained it if it was cooler in the UK but it was a hot sunny afternoon last Saturday so that can’t be a factor. The only thing that I think England have in their favour that most of the other countries don’t have is that apart from one player the team/ squad all play in England so are more familiar with the way each other plays, whereas every other country’s team has a number of players fhat earn their money playing for a club in another country.2 -
There is that of course…se9addick said:
I think you might be seeing what you want to see there!letthegoodtimesroll said:So now we’ve seen all the teams, the one thing that kept coming to mind is that, apart from England, all the other teams looked like they’ve haven’t played a game for a couple of months and had only just met up with their teammates. There seems to be a lot of flat footed players in every team being too slow off the mark, balls played into areas in the expectation that a player will run into the space that didn’t happen, and untold number of interceptions of passes that didn’t have a chance of getting to the player it was intended for in the first place. Yes, there were 3 English clubs in the two European finals but most of those players wouldn’t have been English so that doesn’t explain why England looked, IMO, a few weeks further down the line in a tournament of teams still in pre-season match fitness. Weather could have explained it if it was cooler in the UK but it was a hot sunny afternoon last Saturday so that can’t be a factor. The only thing that I think England have in their favour that most of the other countries don’t have is that apart from one player the team/ squad all play in England so are more familiar with the way each other plays, whereas every other country’s team has a number of players fhat earn their money playing for a club in another country.
this next round of games might show us something different in those teams, or more or the same0 -
Or, just to throw another factor into the mix, 3 of the 4 finalists in the two European finals were English PL teams. It was close to being all 4. That tends to suggest the style of play in the PL had the edge last season. Maybe with so many PL players in the England team it means the squad has gelled more quickly through familiarity, whereas other country’s teams are burdened with a healthy mix of PL players and non-PL players and that’s what is causing that disconnect on the pitch that I think we’ve been seeing in that first round of games.0
-
Yeah, maybe…0
-
Yeah, maybe…0
-
Or it suggests that perhaps the 2 Champions league finalists spending over 350m on new signings in a season where almost all of the rest of Europe's top clubs struggled financially because of Covid, gave them the edge?letthegoodtimesroll said:Or, just to throw another factor into the mix, 3 of the 4 finalists in the two European finals were English PL teams. It was close to being all 4. That tends to suggest the style of play in the PL had the edge last season. Maybe with so many PL players in the England team it means the squad has gelled more quickly through familiarity, whereas other country’s teams are burdened with a healthy mix of PL players and non-PL players and that’s what is causing that disconnect on the pitch that I think we’ve been seeing in that first round of games.1 -
Teams with deep pockets just spend more money, they don’t necessarily get better value for their money.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Or it suggests that perhaps the 2 Champions league finalists spending over 350m on new signings in a season where almost all of the rest of Europe's top clubs struggled financially because of Covid, gave them the edge?letthegoodtimesroll said:Or, just to throw another factor into the mix, 3 of the 4 finalists in the two European finals were English PL teams. It was close to being all 4. That tends to suggest the style of play in the PL had the edge last season. Maybe with so many PL players in the England team it means the squad has gelled more quickly through familiarity, whereas other country’s teams are burdened with a healthy mix of PL players and non-PL players and that’s what is causing that disconnect on the pitch that I think we’ve been seeing in that first round of games.0 -
agreedEugenesAxe said:
Fanny magnet 🧲RodneyCharltonTrotta said:EugenesAxe said:
Don’t avoid the question…RodneyCharltonTrotta said:EugenesAxe said:
Lets see a picture of your good self then…RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Griezmann looks like he works in a bar in Shoreditch
No. Now get back behind the jump and serve the city workers and hipsters before your boss sees you on your phone.
Edited post...scroll up and you'll see a recent one. Not my best.0 -
Think there is an argument that the best 3 teams so far, England, France and Italy play a very top end Premier League style, high press and quick on transition.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Or it suggests that perhaps the 2 Champions league finalists spending over 350m on new signings in a season where almost all of the rest of Europe's top clubs struggled financially because of Covid, gave them the edge?letthegoodtimesroll said:Or, just to throw another factor into the mix, 3 of the 4 finalists in the two European finals were English PL teams. It was close to being all 4. That tends to suggest the style of play in the PL had the edge last season. Maybe with so many PL players in the England team it means the squad has gelled more quickly through familiarity, whereas other country’s teams are burdened with a healthy mix of PL players and non-PL players and that’s what is causing that disconnect on the pitch that I think we’ve been seeing in that first round of games.1 -
But we do have to see more football before we can make reliable conclusions.0
- Sponsored links:
-
https://www.football365.com/news/france-let-pavard-continue-knocked-out-concussion
That's pretty bad, you can't be just "a bit" knocked out and treating concussion lightly is a terrible idea.0 -
I don't think the ref stopped the game quickly enough0
-
Portugal look good albeit against weak opposition .. Germany can't score, France look good on the break but rely on Kanté doing the work of three men .. Italy look in form as do England .. Scots can't score, Wales are full of hwyl but lack technique ((:>) .. Netherlands are better than expected, Belgium look decent .. good tournament so far .. great to see, and hear crowds once again1
-
I know this was pre France - Germany, i personally feel we could beat Italy. Would be a tough game but with their aging defense (dinosaurs) if we played with pace up top they would find it very hard to deal with.CAFCsayer said:Only team I don't fancy us to beat so far is italy
France last night although they let Germany play a bit and could have easily drawn, i feel they have alot more in the tank. Mbappe is frightening, only takes a split second for someone to lose him or for him to get behind, unlucky with the disallowed goal that was very ronaldoesque.
Portugal score flattered them, but on paper their side is very good and will be a tough last 320 -
If you compare wages paid to league position it has a very strong correlation.letthegoodtimesroll said:
Teams with deep pockets just spend more money, they don’t necessarily get better value for their money.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Or it suggests that perhaps the 2 Champions league finalists spending over 350m on new signings in a season where almost all of the rest of Europe's top clubs struggled financially because of Covid, gave them the edge?letthegoodtimesroll said:Or, just to throw another factor into the mix, 3 of the 4 finalists in the two European finals were English PL teams. It was close to being all 4. That tends to suggest the style of play in the PL had the edge last season. Maybe with so many PL players in the England team it means the squad has gelled more quickly through familiarity, whereas other country’s teams are burdened with a healthy mix of PL players and non-PL players and that’s what is causing that disconnect on the pitch that I think we’ve been seeing in that first round of games.
The bigger spenders tend to win more, it's just a fact.2 -
LawrieAbrahams said:
I completely agree, i have many times sworn at the TV after listening to his irritating bullshit. I was delighted when I heard ITV had given Sam Whatshisface the top job.lordromford said:I know some of you may think I have an irrational dislike of Clive Tyldesley, the cushion faced prick, but I’ve been paying close attention in the last few minutes to what he actually says during the game.
For the last fifteen minutes or so, he hasn’t done any real commentating - you know, the old “Griezmann…Mbappe…to Kante…” sort of thing. He actually doesn’t do the job he’s paid to do. All he does is make banal, dim witted or spiteful comments to try to make his co-commentator laugh. He’s like a bloke who’s come into your house and keeps piping up with shit jokes while you’re trying to focus on the game. Drives me mad.
He’s an utter prick. (With a face like a cushion).
Bloody hell. You should try French commentators. They weren't so bad last night but they still had a tendency to ramble on off topic. The real horror show is in the studio. It's akin to The Peter Crouch programme with people who know nothing about the game. They often invite a comedian and / or journalist. There is no proper analysis. Perhaps this is why Vierra was on ITV; he is far too knowledgeable about the game for the French studio's tastes - no joke. It's a shame because I don't see that the French public wouldn't appreciate it.LawrieAbrahams said:
I completely agree, i have many times sworn at the TV after listening to his irritating bullshit. I was delighted when I heard ITV had given Sam Whatshisface the top job.lordromford said:I know some of you may think I have an irrational dislike of Clive Tyldesley, the cushion faced prick, but I’ve been paying close attention in the last few minutes to what he actually says during the game.
For the last fifteen minutes or so, he hasn’t done any real commentating - you know, the old “Griezmann…Mbappe…to Kante…” sort of thing. He actually doesn’t do the job he’s paid to do. All he does is make banal, dim witted or spiteful comments to try to make his co-commentator laugh. He’s like a bloke who’s come into your house and keeps piping up with shit jokes while you’re trying to focus on the game. Drives me mad.
He’s an utter prick. (With a face like a cushion).0 -
I think so too. That reminds me of my over optimistic feelings when I was younger. There's one point I would even then have disagreed with and that is the players overseas subject. I think that having players in different countries can only be a help not a hindrance - so long as they're at top clubs that is.se9addick said:
I think you might be seeing what you want to see there!letthegoodtimesroll said:So now we’ve seen all the teams, the one thing that kept coming to mind is that, apart from England, all the other teams looked like they’ve haven’t played a game for a couple of months and had only just met up with their teammates. There seems to be a lot of flat footed players in every team being too slow off the mark, balls played into areas in the expectation that a player will run into the space that didn’t happen, and untold number of interceptions of passes that didn’t have a chance of getting to the player it was intended for in the first place. Yes, there were 3 English clubs in the two European finals but most of those players wouldn’t have been English so that doesn’t explain why England looked, IMO, a few weeks further down the line in a tournament of teams still in pre-season match fitness. Weather could have explained it if it was cooler in the UK but it was a hot sunny afternoon last Saturday so that can’t be a factor. The only thing that I think England have in their favour that most of the other countries don’t have is that apart from one player the team/ squad all play in England so are more familiar with the way each other plays, whereas every other country’s team has a number of players fhat earn their money playing for a club in another country.0 -
Enjoying the tournament so far , but most of the teams , including Germany and Spain , have looked bang average . Only Italy, Portugal , Belgium and dare I say , England have impressed . Early days , but we could go a long way .0
-
France didn't impress ?sinceiwasyoung said:Enjoying the tournament so far , but most of the teams , including Germany and Spain , have looked bang average . Only Italy, Portugal , Belgium and dare I say , England have impressed . Early days , but we could go a long way .0 -
blackpool72 said:
France didn't impress ?sinceiwasyoung said:Enjoying the tournament so far , but most of the teams , including Germany and Spain , have looked bang average . Only Italy, Portugal , Belgium and dare I say , England have impressed . Early days , but we could go a long way .
.not when you consider how poor Germany were1 - Sponsored links:
-
And their only goal was a fluke own goalletthegoodtimesroll said:blackpool72 said:
France didn't impress ?sinceiwasyoung said:Enjoying the tournament so far , but most of the teams , including Germany and Spain , have looked bang average . Only Italy, Portugal , Belgium and dare I say , England have impressed . Early days , but we could go a long way .
.not when you consider how poor Germany were0 -
Has been given a one game banCovered End said:Austria star Marko Arnautovic has denied being a racist while apologising for making an offensive slur in his side's win over North Macedonia, but is now the subject of a UEFA investigation.
Arnautovic scored in Austria's 3-1 victory on Sunday and was seen gesturing in the direction of North Macedonia's Ezgjan Alioski, allegedly saying: "I'm f***ing your Albanian mother".
The striker has been accused of using a racially charged word during his confrontation with Alioski, but Arnautovic has denied it while also apologising for the "heated" incident.
What did Arnautovic have to say?
"There were some heated words yesterday in the emotions of the game for which I would like to APOLOGIZE - especially to my friends from North Macedonia and Albania," he wrote on Instagram.
"I would like to say one thing very clearly: I AM NOT A RACIST! I have friends in almost every country and I stand for diversity. Everyone who knows me is aware of that."
UEFA's response
UEFA have launched an official investigation into Anautovic's actions after receiving a letter from The North Macedonian Football Association (FFM) in which they demanded that the 32-year-old face the "severest punishment".
The statement released on Tuesday morning reads: "In accordance with the Article 31(4) of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations, an Ethics and Disciplinary Inspector has been appointed to conduct an investigation regarding the incident involving the player Marko Arnautović that occurred during the 2020 European Championship group-stage match between the national teams of Austria and North Macedonia on 13 June 2021.
"Further information on this matter will be made available in due course."
The meaning behind Arnautovic's words
The use of language reportedly dates back to the Kosovo War, with Arnautovic, whose father is Serbian, targeting Alioski, who is of Albanian origins.
Arnautovic allegedly used an anti-Albanian slur towards Egzon Bejtulai before then celebrating his goal by yelling towards Alioski, only stopping after being restrained by team-mate David Alaba.
There is historic tension between Serbia and Albania, while Serbia and North Macedonia have long had a tense relationship.
The politics surrounding these countries were also a major talking point at the 2018 World Cup, when Granit Xhaka and Xherdan Shaqiri were fined £7,600 each after the two Swiss stars, who have Albanian links, celebrated by putting their hands together to form a double-headed eagle representing the Albanian flag during a game against Serbia.
3 -
Not overly , but they will undoubtedly get better. They should have battered a poor german side . I think even Ben Watson would have skinned Hummels.blackpool72 said:
France didn't impress ?sinceiwasyoung said:Enjoying the tournament so far , but most of the teams , including Germany and Spain , have looked bang average . Only Italy, Portugal , Belgium and dare I say , England have impressed . Early days , but we could go a long way .0 -
Finland v Russia should be a good game this afternoon
Neither played well in their first games so should be a bit more level
If its a draw that should see Finland through0 -
Do we ever beat Italy?johnnybev1987 said:
I know this was pre France - Germany, i personally feel we could beat Italy. Would be a tough game but with their aging defense (dinosaurs) if we played with pace up top they would find it very hard to deal with.CAFCsayer said:Only team I don't fancy us to beat so far is italy
France last night although they let Germany play a bit and could have easily drawn, i feel they have alot more in the tank. Mbappe is frightening, only takes a split second for someone to lose him or for him to get behind, unlucky with the disallowed goal that was very ronaldoesque.
Portugal score flattered them, but on paper their side is very good and will be a tough last 32
Struggling to think of a time when we've ever beaten them in a competitive game.0 -
You will see a totally different Turkey today and I believe they will attack and support their decent striker who had no service against a strong Italian Side. Fancy them to win by a couple of goals.
My Maternal Welsh grandad will be looking down on me with distain but never let your heart rule your head when it comes to predictions.0 -
I hope Vieira and Roy Keane jostle and abuse each other in the green room before the transmission starts, for old times sakejimmymelrose said:LawrieAbrahams said:
I completely agree, i have many times sworn at the TV after listening to his irritating bullshit. I was delighted when I heard ITV had given Sam Whatshisface the top job.lordromford said:I know some of you may think I have an irrational dislike of Clive Tyldesley, the cushion faced prick, but I’ve been paying close attention in the last few minutes to what he actually says during the game.
For the last fifteen minutes or so, he hasn’t done any real commentating - you know, the old “Griezmann…Mbappe…to Kante…” sort of thing. He actually doesn’t do the job he’s paid to do. All he does is make banal, dim witted or spiteful comments to try to make his co-commentator laugh. He’s like a bloke who’s come into your house and keeps piping up with shit jokes while you’re trying to focus on the game. Drives me mad.
He’s an utter prick. (With a face like a cushion).
Bloody hell. You should try French commentators. They weren't so bad last night but they still had a tendency to ramble on off topic. The real horror show is in the studio. It's akin to The Peter Crouch programme with people who know nothing about the game. They often invite a comedian and / or journalist. There is no proper analysis. Perhaps this is why Vierra was on ITV; he is far too knowledgeable about the game for the French studio's tastes - no joke. It's a shame because I don't see that the French public wouldn't appreciate it.LawrieAbrahams said:
I completely agree, i have many times sworn at the TV after listening to his irritating bullshit. I was delighted when I heard ITV had given Sam Whatshisface the top job.lordromford said:I know some of you may think I have an irrational dislike of Clive Tyldesley, the cushion faced prick, but I’ve been paying close attention in the last few minutes to what he actually says during the game.
For the last fifteen minutes or so, he hasn’t done any real commentating - you know, the old “Griezmann…Mbappe…to Kante…” sort of thing. He actually doesn’t do the job he’s paid to do. All he does is make banal, dim witted or spiteful comments to try to make his co-commentator laugh. He’s like a bloke who’s come into your house and keeps piping up with shit jokes while you’re trying to focus on the game. Drives me mad.
He’s an utter prick. (With a face like a cushion).
1 -
https://www.soccerbase.com/teams/head_to_head.sd?team_id=909&team2_id=1384Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Do we ever beat Italy?johnnybev1987 said:
I know this was pre France - Germany, i personally feel we could beat Italy. Would be a tough game but with their aging defense (dinosaurs) if we played with pace up top they would find it very hard to deal with.CAFCsayer said:Only team I don't fancy us to beat so far is italy
France last night although they let Germany play a bit and could have easily drawn, i feel they have alot more in the tank. Mbappe is frightening, only takes a split second for someone to lose him or for him to get behind, unlucky with the disallowed goal that was very ronaldoesque.
Portugal score flattered them, but on paper their side is very good and will be a tough last 32
Struggling to think of a time when we've ever beaten them in a competitive game.
Beaten them in a qualifier for the 1978 World Cup (they pipped us to qualification) but otherwise we've only ever won in friendlies
Brazil | Italy | Netherlands | Uruguay are the only four who have a better head to head against us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_national_football_team_all-time_record
0 -
Finland need only a point which all but guarantees a knockout berth. Russia need three points to give themselves a chance. I can see it being a slow game with a late ish goal (60-80 mins) deciding it.ForeverAddickted said:Finland v Russia should be a good game this afternoon
Neither played well in their first games so should be a bit more level
If its a draw that should see Finland through1 -
I'm really struggling to think of memorable England vs Italy matches, other than the 1997 draw which got us qualification, and that's more for Paul Ince!ForeverAddickted said:
https://www.soccerbase.com/teams/head_to_head.sd?team_id=909&team2_id=1384Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Do we ever beat Italy?johnnybev1987 said:
I know this was pre France - Germany, i personally feel we could beat Italy. Would be a tough game but with their aging defense (dinosaurs) if we played with pace up top they would find it very hard to deal with.CAFCsayer said:Only team I don't fancy us to beat so far is italy
France last night although they let Germany play a bit and could have easily drawn, i feel they have alot more in the tank. Mbappe is frightening, only takes a split second for someone to lose him or for him to get behind, unlucky with the disallowed goal that was very ronaldoesque.
Portugal score flattered them, but on paper their side is very good and will be a tough last 32
Struggling to think of a time when we've ever beaten them in a competitive game.
Beaten them in a qualifier for the 1978 World Cup (they pipped us to qualification) but otherwise we've only ever won in friendlies
Brazil | Italy | Netherlands | Uruguay are the only four who have a better head to head against us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_national_football_team_all-time_record
By contrast England have had so many big games against Germany.3
