Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Post-match thread: Cheltenham v Charlton | 3pm Saturday 15th January
Comments
-
Croydon said:ForeverAddickted said:ElliotCAFC said:We have goalline tech don’t we?
Imagine it'll never filter down to the rest of the Football League either as clubs must have to cover the costs themselves.3 -
killerandflash said:Croydon said:ForeverAddickted said:ElliotCAFC said:We have goalline tech don’t we?
Imagine it'll never filter down to the rest of the Football League either as clubs must have to cover the costs themselves.0 -
Speaking of offside, has Chuks' equaliser been disallowed yet?
Seeing he spent a fair chunk of his Charlton career Saturday being flagged for offside and how much discussion there was before the "equaliser" at Crewe was ruled out last week, I suppose we should be due a decision soon ...0 -
Briston_Addick said:Speaking of offside, has Chuks' equaliser been disallowed yet?
Seeing he spent a fair chunk of his Charlton career Saturday being flagged for offside and how much discussion there was before the "equaliser" at Crewe was ruled out last week, I suppose we should be due a decision soon ...
Who heads it to an onside Chuks (in line with their no.4)
His arm may be offside but you can't play the ball with your arm. Looking at his feet, you'd be hard pressed to call it either way and as such, benefit of the doubt goes to the attacker.
In reality Cheltenham still got three men and a goalkeeper in to positions where such a soft flick should not have resulted in a goal. Their no.5 even tried to block it with his hands.
4 -
So we deserved a goal AND a penalty! Last week's ref might have just done that!1
-
Dazzler21 said:Briston_Addick said:Speaking of offside, has Chuks' equaliser been disallowed yet?
Seeing he spent a fair chunk of his Charlton career Saturday being flagged for offside and how much discussion there was before the "equaliser" at Crewe was ruled out last week, I suppose we should be due a decision soon ...
Who heads it to an onside Chuks (in line with their no.4)
His arm may be offside but you can't play the ball with your arm. Looking at his feet, you'd be hard pressed to call it either way and as such, benefit of the doubt goes to the attacker.
In reality Cheltenham still got three men and a goalkeeper in to positions where such a soft flick should not have resulted in a goal. Their no.5 even tried to block it with his hands.
Gotta trust the lino on that one.0 -
Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:Dazzler21 said:Briston_Addick said:Speaking of offside, has Chuks' equaliser been disallowed yet?
Seeing he spent a fair chunk of his Charlton career Saturday being flagged for offside and how much discussion there was before the "equaliser" at Crewe was ruled out last week, I suppose we should be due a decision soon ...
Who heads it to an onside Chuks (in line with their no.4)
His arm may be offside but you can't play the ball with your arm. Looking at his feet, you'd be hard pressed to call it either way and as such, benefit of the doubt goes to the attacker.
In reality Cheltenham still got three men and a goalkeeper in to positions where such a soft flick should not have resulted in a goal. Their no.5 even tried to block it with his hands.
Gotta trust the lino on that one.0