My theory. The two shots in short succession sounded like double tapping from the same weapon. I doubt that Pilkington's workshop manufactured firearm could manage that. So Kate probably shot him unless Davidson had a decent weapon to shoot either or both Kate and Pilkington.
My theory. The two shots in short succession sounded like double tapping from the same weapon. I doubt that Pilkington's workshop manufactured firearm could manage that. So Kate probably shot him unless Davidson had a decent weapon to shoot either or both Kate and Pilkington.
So, of the three people at the scene, you have narrowed down the shooter to either Kate or Jo, with the possibility it might have been Ryan, or it could be Kate and Jo. And you have also narrowed down the likely victim of the shooting to be Ryan, or Ryan and Kate, with the possibility it might have been Kate.
Good theory - I think you might be on to something, fella.
My theory. The two shots in short succession sounded like double tapping from the same weapon. I doubt that Pilkington's workshop manufactured firearm could manage that. So Kate probably shot him unless Davidson had a decent weapon to shoot either or both Kate and Pilkington.
So, of the three people at the scene, you have narrowed down the shooter to either Kate or Jo, with the possibility it might have been Ryan, or it could be Kate and Jo. And you have also narrowed down the likely victim of the shooting to be Ryan, or Ryan and Kate, with the possibility it might have been Kate.
Good theory - I think you might be on to something, fella.
Backing every horse in a race is a sure way of picking the winner - I wouldn't advise it as a strategy though!
My theory. The two shots in short succession sounded like double tapping from the same weapon. I doubt that Pilkington's workshop manufactured firearm could manage that. So Kate probably shot him unless Davidson had a decent weapon to shoot either or both Kate and Pilkington.
So, of the three people at the scene, you have narrowed down the shooter to either Kate or Jo, with the possibility it might have been Ryan, or it could be Kate and Jo. And you have also narrowed down the likely victim of the shooting to be Ryan, or Ryan and Kate, with the possibility it might have been Kate.
Good theory - I think you might be on to something, fella.
Backing every horse in a race is a sure way of picking the winner - I wouldn't advise it as a strategy though!
Used to be a decent option back in the Pricewise days and bookies going back to the grid prices at 8.30/9am. You could guarantee a profit on some races by backing every horse!
Or Ryan shot Jo knowing that she would blab them Kate put one in him
I am fairly confident they traded shots. I don't get why though. Ryan went there to kill Kate and decided to have a long drawn out conversation instead! Why? Why do the bad guys always have to give a speech giving the main characters a chance to save themselves?
Given this, I reckon Ryan fired first possibly injuring Kate, she returns fire killing him is my guess. Hero's are always crack shots with insta-kill mods whereas bad guys are usually Storm Troopers.
I would really like a GOT-esque killing of a main character though. I hate TV shows where the main characters continually survive unreasonable situations.
Pretty suspicious that the surveillance on Ryan + Davison got pulled by Carmichael at the exact time they were off to kill Kate - very similar situation to the start of the season when the surveillance was pulled for the few hours when they switched Carl Banks for Terry Boyle in the flat.
Line of Duty likes to use the same evidence/MO to make connections to the OCG ...
Pretty suspicious that the surveillance on Ryan + Davison got pulled by Carmichael at the exact time they were off to kill Kate - very similar situation to the start of the season when the surveillance was pulled for the few hours when they switched Carl Banks for Terry Boyle in the flat.
Line of Duty likes to use the same evidence/MO to make connections to the OCG ...
If there’s anyone that Hastings tags for being H, I so hope it’s Carmichael.
Thinking on it more she'd probably have the ability to question if the surveillance on the Banks/Boyle flat was 'legal' to set up the events in that first episode too - they pinned that on Buckles purposefully issuing the wrong order or something but he seems to have got caught up in it all rather than masterminding the events.
And she was sent to meddle in AC12s investigation by the Commissioner who is linked to the Peadophilia scandal and this Thurwell fella...
Or is someone can post the series trailer that has the clue....
I think the trailer pretty much points to Ryan being the one that was shot. If Kate or Jo got shot, they recovered pretty well to then be on their feet straight after!
Thing is there isn't a "H" anymore is there. The finale of the previous series concluded that Cottan wasn't doing 4 dots for H, he was doing 4 dots because there are 4 major players. So they are now searching for the final one rather than H.
Or is someone can post the series trailer that has the clue....
I think the trailer pretty much points to Ryan being the one that was shot. If Kate or Jo got shot, they recovered pretty well to then be on their feet straight after!
I took that trailer to just be trailing the whole series, not just one particular scene in it. ie, this is the kind of series it is just to whet your appetite. Why would Hastings need a megaphone when they are in a small car park & know that there are only 3 protangists present.
Or is someone can post the series trailer that has the clue....
I think the trailer pretty much points to Ryan being the one that was shot. If Kate or Jo got shot, they recovered pretty well to then be on their feet straight after!
I took that trailer to just be trailing the whole series, not just one particular scene in it. ie, this is the kind of series it is just to whet your appetite. Why would Hastings need a megaphone when they are in a small car park & know that there are only 3 protangists present.
Who said it was straight after. They might have got in a car and then been blocked off elsewhere. It might just be a trailer but personally I think it will be in the next episode. Pure guesswork though, plenty of twists to come no doubt.
Jo is not an AFO, so if she shoots Ryan it would be unlawful. Then again she seems to have been unlawful in lots of other areas so why not another indiscretion. It would at least get the little runt off of her back.
No spoilers but just read the synopsis for tonight's episode on Virgin Media's TV planner. Talks about "repercussions of tragic events" and the (admittedly limited) cast list doesnt show Vicky McClure's name.
Comments
Good theory - I think you might be on to something, fella.
Backing every horse in a race is a sure way of picking the winner - I wouldn't advise it as a strategy though!
Alexa gets right on my thrupenny bits - I'm not talking to her anymore.
Given this, I reckon Ryan fired first possibly injuring Kate, she returns fire killing him is my guess. Hero's are always crack shots with insta-kill mods whereas bad guys are usually Storm Troopers.
I would really like a GOT-esque killing of a main character though. I hate TV shows where the main characters continually survive unreasonable situations.
Originally posted by the official BBC page I think so at least someone has a sense of humor about themselves!
Line of Duty likes to use the same evidence/MO to make connections to the OCG ...
And she was sent to meddle in AC12s investigation by the Commissioner who is linked to the Peadophilia scandal and this Thurwell fella...
Or is someone can post the series trailer that has the clue....
What if Jo Davidson double tapped Ryan? He's fully distracted by Kate's gun, if she's authorised to carry, surely Jo is too.