My stance with all Charlton sales from now is that it doesn't really matter if he is sold for £10 or £10m, there is no evidence that it will all be invested back into Charlton. Liege have sold players for 64m EUR and have paid out for 24m EUR since Roland bought them. We will sometimes benefit from the group aspect, other times others may benefit.
I just wanted to see him play for us and develop for another season, was one of the things I was looking forward to most.
Spot on. I don't know why so many fans get caught up about the size of transfers these days - its not their own money and I can think of only very, very few examples where a club has sold one of its best players and been better off for it from a footballing perspective.
I couldn't give a toss if Charlton become 3.5m richer or 7m richer. I'm a football fan, not a spreadsheet enthusiast.
Our league 1 promotion season was massively funded by the sale of Jenkinson right?
3.5m is a total piss take. We've been well and truly mugged if that fee is true.
Also this bit in that article annoys me:
"And any talk of an instant loan back to the Addicks is likely to involve a waiting game. The Reds usually like new signings to spend pre-season in their programme - meaning that it would be well into August before they made a decision on a temporary exit".
Surely we hold the cards here? You either loan him back or there's no deal. Piss off.
How much did Gareth bale leave saints for a few years back. A left back at the time, about the same age and a fee of about £8 million approx if I remember right. If the big clubs want him then pay the rate we want if not they can bugger off!
At a club like ours, a player of the quality of Gomez comes through the ranks once in a blue moon. If they let him go for anything less than £5M up-front, they may as well close the club down.
cheer up .. it's the summer .. mind you from your chosen site name, I am guessing you don't have a particularly sunny outlook on life ((:>)
If Gomez goes, he's gone, done and dusted .. our season starts in but a few weeks .. I for one can hardly wait .. and what will we all have to moan and tear out our hair over twas not for CAFC ?
A club that has been homeless and broke as well as often relegated only to rise like the Phoenix can certainly stand the loss of a decent young player, especially as his leaving should mean a good few quid going into the kitty
I could call myself Happy Clappy Addick - I still wouldn't want us selling our prize asset for peanuts, particularly to those bin dipping bastards.
The fee anyway will be undisclosed so if and when he goes, we will be none the wiser.
You think that will stop this lot telling you that their mates, half brothers, sisters dog walker met a bloke in the park who works in the West Stand kitchens and he overheard Katrien saying that we got £24m, a complete refurb of the ladies loos in the East Stand and a years worth of pulled pork in return for Gomez.
It pains me how much football transfer fees have become warped in today's day and age. Unless Roland pockets it, £4 million could do a hell of a lot for our club. Like bringing back the opera singer on the final day of the season.
If it is 5-6m up front with add ons to 10m then for a 17 year old with around 20 first team games to his name, I think we've done well.
No point bitching about it, as soon as Liverpool, Arsenal and Man City are mentioned Joe's eye will have come off the CAFC ball. Who can blame him, the Premiership is such that a 4-5 year deal with any of the above will make him and his family for life.
Hopefully we now focus on getting absolutely the best deal for the club and with Arsenal and Man City being mentioned, who knows perhaps the price will bump up.
I doubt Joe was a player we were actively looking to move on, so we could see an adjust of the transfer budget upwards.
Although the money would be nice, IF we get to splash some, the biggest problem with selling Joe at this point will be the message it sends. To our better players, to our opponents, to us the fans. Even though Roland is a half-billionaire CAFC are still cheapskates. A relatively low wage structure and snatching the hand off the first big-time charlie that come along waving the chequebook. Never serious about building a team capable of challenging for the Premier League again.
Except no hands have been bitten off at all, yet. In fact, the up front price has now apparently nearly doubled! Let's just see what price Gomez does go for, if at all, before we start wringing our hands about business practices. It could well be just as accurate to say that CAFC are a club that can and do produce top prospects, but if you want them then you'd better be willing to pay good money, up front, for them. And in that, we are hardly alone.
It makes u wonder does RD know about the premier league lol so much potential to make the club bigger and better! And he calls himself a business man!!! Pffftttttt
It makes u wonder does RD know about the premier league lol so much potential to make the club bigger and better! And he calls himself a business man!!! Pffftttttt
The fact he is an excellent business man and not primarily a football nut, is, some might argue, part of the problem. From a business perspective a potenial 10m into the club for 17 year old is a good deal.
In one way it'll be good to get our selling done early, so we can focus on bringing in the new squad and not have potential big numbers for key players hanging over us. In another way having no centre backs (assuming Bikey leaves) when our defense was a key factor last season...
3.5m doesn't go a long way if you're buying proven
I think/fear that CAFC will soon be a kindergarten for young Europeans being tested out for the network .. until January that is when, as last season, we're possibly struggling and there will be moves to bring in experienced Brits as what occurred with the signings of Johnson and Eagles .. though to look on the brighter side, Watt, although a Scot, was a Euro import and he's not too shabby
And that appears to be the master plan which Powell and Dyer baulked at. Last season we had a midfield of Gudmundsson, Buyens, Cousins and Bulot. All under 25, most with two years left on their contracts last summer, now just 12 months.
But contrast that to Pritchard, Jackson, Stephens/Poyet and Harriott the season before.
For sure we are a shop window but the thing is we always were! Only this time the merchandise goes for a much higher price. We got peanuts for Palmer and compensation for Poyet whereas now Gomez (and others) will go for much bigger fees. Right now we have several players who could fetch decent fees and that covers our losses as well as paying for the next wave of recruitment.
As you say, when we're struggling, older reinforcements are brought in on short term deals but they are not part of the long term. I really hope if we are flying it one season then decent players are acquired in January to push us into the play-offs.
Personally I think this only works for the fans if the club squad improves every six or 12 months. If we, as a club, stand still in 12th then fans will rightly say that selling top talent is short sighted and completely ignores the prospects of FAPL revenues. But if we can sell talent, minimise losses AND improve every season then that's a model which works! Contrast that to many Championship clubs with aging squads and losses of 10M per annum
Lol so 1m a couple of weeks ago, then 3.5 then 4 then 6 then 8 now 9. The rate of inflation so far suggests when we eventually sell him we'll be getting ridiculous amounts of money!
It makes u wonder does RD know about the premier league lol so much potential to make the club bigger and better! And he calls himself a business man!!! Pffftttttt
The fact he is an excellent business man and not primarily a football nut, is, some might argue, part of the problem.
Why is this persistently mentioned.
The man owns more Clubs than Peter Stringfellow, or course he's a football nut.
Comments
Also this bit in that article annoys me:
"And any talk of an instant loan back to the Addicks is likely to involve a waiting game. The Reds usually like new signings to spend pre-season in their programme - meaning that it would be well into August before they made a decision on a temporary exit".
Surely we hold the cards here? You either loan him back or there's no deal. Piss off.
£5-6m is the likely initial payment according to Cawley now
No point bitching about it, as soon as Liverpool, Arsenal and Man City are mentioned Joe's eye will have come off the CAFC ball. Who can blame him, the Premiership is such that a 4-5 year deal with any of the above will make him and his family for life.
Hopefully we now focus on getting absolutely the best deal for the club and with Arsenal and Man City being mentioned, who knows perhaps the price will bump up.
I doubt Joe was a player we were actively looking to move on, so we could see an adjust of the transfer budget upwards.
Could not care about the money, just want to see one of our excellent young prospects play more than a few games for us.
Jenks, JGomez, Poyet, Palmer, Shelvey....add all of their appearances together and it is less than the amount of games we got out of Therry Racon!
But contrast that to Pritchard, Jackson, Stephens/Poyet and Harriott the season before.
For sure we are a shop window but the thing is we always were! Only this time the merchandise goes for a much higher price. We got peanuts for Palmer and compensation for Poyet whereas now Gomez (and others) will go for much bigger fees. Right now we have several players who could fetch decent fees and that covers our losses as well as paying for the next wave of recruitment.
As you say, when we're struggling, older reinforcements are brought in on short term deals but they are not part of the long term. I really hope if we are flying it one season then decent players are acquired in January to push us into the play-offs.
Personally I think this only works for the fans if the club squad improves every six or 12 months. If we, as a club, stand still in 12th then fans will rightly say that selling top talent is short sighted and completely ignores the prospects of FAPL revenues. But if we can sell talent, minimise losses AND improve every season then that's a model which works! Contrast that to many Championship clubs with aging squads and losses of 10M per annum
The man owns more Clubs than Peter Stringfellow, or course he's a football nut.