Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Transfer rumours thread (DEADLINE DAY starts page 300)

1115116118120121345

Comments

  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,741
    colin1961 said:

    Source ?
    As people keep saying

    Source ?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,319
    edited July 2016
    Did a damned good deal for Ajose then!!

    MILLWALL REJECT GREGORY BID

    Millwall have turned down an offer of £1.2m from Rotherham for Lee Gregory, according to reports in the Rotherham Advertiser.
  • tgarrat1
    tgarrat1 Posts: 266
    'Not to mention that fact that Charlton are still waiting for some major changes. Cousins, Johann Berg Gudmundsson and Ademola Lookman will go. Keeper Nick Pope, untroubled in the opening 45 minutes, is another that could be on the move along with Teixeira, who seems to lack the appetite to play below the Championship.'

    Richard Cawley suggesting those 3 are almost certainly on their way..
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,319
    Noticed that Spurs have just signed that Vincent Janssen from AZ Alkmaar.

    What caught my eye was that he was playing at the same level as Polish Pete when we signed him... He'd scored 16-goals for De Graafschap that season and was signed by us for £800k, Janssen was playing for Almare City and scored 10-goals that same season and a year later went to AZ for £350k... Another round of applause for the regime and their Spreadsheets?
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,561
    http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=119040

    bye, bye Zach - thanks for the memories !!
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,269
    Should have been a good player, and when he scored in the cup game I thought he looked decent, but it didn't work out for him
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600

    http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=119040

    bye, bye Zach - thanks for the memories !!

    4 Year Contract! Good grief.

  • All_Thaid_Up
    All_Thaid_Up Posts: 2,293
    I do hope we are not paying him off.
  • Madz
    Madz Posts: 1,004
    Crazy. Another player we are just letting go. if people don't want to play for us then that is fine they can leave, but we must be better at off loading players. Unless its been terminated with mutual consent so there is no charge to the club. If there is a cost involved then Oh My God!!!
  • Sponsored links:



  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,738

    I do hope we are not paying him off.

    Of course we will be. He is/was a full international coming from La Liga. He will be on decent money, why on earth would he give up 3 years at around 3-5k per week?

    Even if we negotiate a pay off of say 2 years and he is on 3k a week you are looking at £456,000 in wages alone for the 1 year he has spent with is.

    Jesus wept.
  • All_Thaid_Up
    All_Thaid_Up Posts: 2,293
    We gave him a 4yr deal. we better have got away with mutual termination otherwise its another K bitch special!
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,225
    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,230

    http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=119040

    bye, bye Zach - thanks for the memories !!

    The Belgium version of "Football Manager" needs burning along with that sofa
  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,107
    edited July 2016

    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

    It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?
  • Covered_End_Lad
    Covered_End_Lad Posts: 5,725
    _MrDick said:

    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

    It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?
    You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,225

    _MrDick said:

    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

    It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?
    You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though.
    Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.

    Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.
  • Covered_End_Lad
    Covered_End_Lad Posts: 5,725

    _MrDick said:

    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

    It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?
    You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though.
    Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.

    Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.
    Agree with the last paragraph Henry, but sadly we don't operate under what should happen anymore :(
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,561

    I do hope we are not paying him off.

    Of course we will be. He is/was a full international coming from La Liga. He will be on decent money, why on earth would he give up 3 years at around 3-5k per week?

    Even if we negotiate a pay off of say 2 years and he is on 3k a week you are looking at £456,000 in wages alone for the 1 year he has spent with is.

    Jesus wept.
    saying that he hasn't turned up for training. a 'sackable' offence maybe?
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,225

    _MrDick said:

    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

    It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?
    You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though.
    Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.

    Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.
    Agree with the last paragraph Henry, but sadly we don't operate under what should happen anymore :(
    True but in this case I think Zac has gone AWOL and we've been left with no option. Not that I think Slade will be very upset, I'm not.
  • Sponsored links:



  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,223
    I was one of very few people who thought he was half decent... Could at least cross a ball. Would have kept him as backup
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,849
    I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,561

    I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer

    must have missed that

  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,376

    I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer

    must have missed that

    Buyens, TBH, Bulot, JBG and perhaps Bikey for half a season. It was enough to keep us up.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    edited July 2016
    KM appears to be costing RD millions. He must so desperate to keep her as his shield.

    Unless RD states the terms & KM just negotiates around the edges.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,849
    Scoham said:

    I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer

    must have missed that

    Buyens, TBH, Bulot, JBG and perhaps Bikey for half a season. It was enough to keep us up.
    Igor (pre injury) and Henderson too
  • Noticed that Spurs have just signed that Vincent Janssen from AZ Alkmaar.

    What caught my eye was that he was playing at the same level as Polish Pete when we signed him... He'd scored 16-goals for De Graafschap that season and was signed by us for £800k, Janssen was playing for Almare City and scored 10-goals that same season and a year later went to AZ for £350k... Another round of applause for the regime and their Spreadsheets?


    17m for a striker who's only had 1 (admittedly good) season in the Eredivisie seems a lot of money though. Buys from that league can go either way. Could be a Suarez or a van Nistelrooy but could just as easily be a Kezman or an Alves.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824

    Noticed that Spurs have just signed that Vincent Janssen from AZ Alkmaar.

    What caught my eye was that he was playing at the same level as Polish Pete when we signed him... He'd scored 16-goals for De Graafschap that season and was signed by us for £800k, Janssen was playing for Almare City and scored 10-goals that same season and a year later went to AZ for £350k... Another round of applause for the regime and their Spreadsheets?


    17m for a striker who's only had 1 (admittedly good) season in the Eredivisie seems a lot of money though. Buys from that league can go either way. Could be a Suarez or a van Nistelrooy but could just as easily be a Kezman or an Alves.
    17m is peanuts for a striker these days , especially as Spurs are in the champions league .
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456

    _MrDick said:

    "Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."

    It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?
    You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though.
    Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.

    Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.
    Agree with the last paragraph Henry, but sadly we don't operate under what should happen anymore :(
    True but in this case I think Zac has gone AWOL and we've been left with no option. Not that I think Slade will be very upset, I'm not.
    If he has gone AWOL and not turned up for training, we should be doing him for breach of contract.

    Do the Club have the names of any good specialist employment lawyers?