Transfer rumours thread (DEADLINE DAY starts page 300)
Comments
-
Source ?colin1961 said:Source ?
As people keep saying
3 -
Did a damned good deal for Ajose then!!
MILLWALL REJECT GREGORY BID
Millwall have turned down an offer of £1.2m from Rotherham for Lee Gregory, according to reports in the Rotherham Advertiser.4 -
'Not to mention that fact that Charlton are still waiting for some major changes. Cousins, Johann Berg Gudmundsson and Ademola Lookman will go. Keeper Nick Pope, untroubled in the opening 45 minutes, is another that could be on the move along with Teixeira, who seems to lack the appetite to play below the Championship.'
Richard Cawley suggesting those 3 are almost certainly on their way..1 -
Noticed that Spurs have just signed that Vincent Janssen from AZ Alkmaar.
What caught my eye was that he was playing at the same level as Polish Pete when we signed him... He'd scored 16-goals for De Graafschap that season and was signed by us for £800k, Janssen was playing for Almare City and scored 10-goals that same season and a year later went to AZ for £350k... Another round of applause for the regime and their Spreadsheets?8 -
1
-
Should have been a good player, and when he scored in the cup game I thought he looked decent, but it didn't work out for him3
-
4 Year Contract! Good grief.LargeAddick said:http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=119040
bye, bye Zach - thanks for the memories !!
4 -
I do hope we are not paying him off.1
-
Crazy. Another player we are just letting go. if people don't want to play for us then that is fine they can leave, but we must be better at off loading players. Unless its been terminated with mutual consent so there is no charge to the club. If there is a cost involved then Oh My God!!!1
- Sponsored links:
-
Of course we will be. He is/was a full international coming from La Liga. He will be on decent money, why on earth would he give up 3 years at around 3-5k per week?All_Thaid_Up said:I do hope we are not paying him off.
Even if we negotiate a pay off of say 2 years and he is on 3k a week you are looking at £456,000 in wages alone for the 1 year he has spent with is.
Jesus wept.6 -
We gave him a 4yr deal. we better have got away with mutual termination otherwise its another K bitch special!0
-
"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
9 -
The Belgium version of "Football Manager" needs burning along with that sofaLargeAddick said:http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=119040
bye, bye Zach - thanks for the memories !!0 -
It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?Henry Irving said:"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
0 -
You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though._MrDick said:
It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?Henry Irving said:"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
2 -
Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.Covered_End_Lad said:
You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though._MrDick said:
It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?Henry Irving said:"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.0 -
Agree with the last paragraph Henry, but sadly we don't operate under what should happen anymoreHenry Irving said:
Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.Covered_End_Lad said:
You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though._MrDick said:
It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?Henry Irving said:"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.0 -
saying that he hasn't turned up for training. a 'sackable' offence maybe?Clem_Snide said:
Of course we will be. He is/was a full international coming from La Liga. He will be on decent money, why on earth would he give up 3 years at around 3-5k per week?All_Thaid_Up said:I do hope we are not paying him off.
Even if we negotiate a pay off of say 2 years and he is on 3k a week you are looking at £456,000 in wages alone for the 1 year he has spent with is.
Jesus wept.0 -
True but in this case I think Zac has gone AWOL and we've been left with no option. Not that I think Slade will be very upset, I'm not.Covered_End_Lad said:
Agree with the last paragraph Henry, but sadly we don't operate under what should happen anymoreHenry Irving said:
Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.Covered_End_Lad said:
You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though._MrDick said:
It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?Henry Irving said:"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.0 - Sponsored links:
-
I was one of very few people who thought he was half decent... Could at least cross a ball. Would have kept him as backup1
-
I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer0
-
must have missed thatkillerandflash said:I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer
6 -
Buyens, TBH, Bulot, JBG and perhaps Bikey for half a season. It was enough to keep us up.LargeAddick said:
must have missed thatkillerandflash said:I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer
4 -
KM appears to be costing RD millions. He must so desperate to keep her as his shield.
Unless RD states the terms & KM just negotiates around the edges.3 -
Igor (pre injury) and Henderson tooScoham said:
Buyens, TBH, Bulot, JBG and perhaps Bikey for half a season. It was enough to keep us up.LargeAddick said:
must have missed thatkillerandflash said:I'd love to be a fly on the wall concerning some of these players dealings with the club, and especially last summer's recruitment which was a shambles after the relatively successful recruitment in the previous summer
5 -
ForeverAddickted said:
Noticed that Spurs have just signed that Vincent Janssen from AZ Alkmaar.
What caught my eye was that he was playing at the same level as Polish Pete when we signed him... He'd scored 16-goals for De Graafschap that season and was signed by us for £800k, Janssen was playing for Almare City and scored 10-goals that same season and a year later went to AZ for £350k... Another round of applause for the regime and their Spreadsheets?
17m for a striker who's only had 1 (admittedly good) season in the Eredivisie seems a lot of money though. Buys from that league can go either way. Could be a Suarez or a van Nistelrooy but could just as easily be a Kezman or an Alves.5 -
-
17m is peanuts for a striker these days , especially as Spurs are in the champions league .Chris_from_Sidcup said:ForeverAddickted said:Noticed that Spurs have just signed that Vincent Janssen from AZ Alkmaar.
What caught my eye was that he was playing at the same level as Polish Pete when we signed him... He'd scored 16-goals for De Graafschap that season and was signed by us for £800k, Janssen was playing for Almare City and scored 10-goals that same season and a year later went to AZ for £350k... Another round of applause for the regime and their Spreadsheets?
17m for a striker who's only had 1 (admittedly good) season in the Eredivisie seems a lot of money though. Buys from that league can go either way. Could be a Suarez or a van Nistelrooy but could just as easily be a Kezman or an Alves.3 -
If he has gone AWOL and not turned up for training, we should be doing him for breach of contract.Henry Irving said:
True but in this case I think Zac has gone AWOL and we've been left with no option. Not that I think Slade will be very upset, I'm not.Covered_End_Lad said:
Agree with the last paragraph Henry, but sadly we don't operate under what should happen anymoreHenry Irving said:
Posibly but that isn't what the SLP is saying. Reads more like his not return to get a move. Wouldn't be surprised if that suits the club as well but still a poor deal as the SLP says.Covered_End_Lad said:
You will probably find he was told not to bother coming in for training BECAUSE they wern't interested in keeping him. May be wrong though._MrDick said:
It just goes to show that contracts are worthless. ZB has effectively gone on strike by not reporting back for training and he's got his way by getting a free transfer. Glad he's going but should we be holding out for a transfer fee?Henry Irving said:"Charlton handed him a contract until 2019 - and his transfer symbolises the botched nature of deals before Russell Slade arrived as manager earlier this summer."
Also with a new manager it should be down to Slade to have a look at him and then move him on not the CEO or whoever to pay him off/sack him before Slade has a chance to decide.
Do the Club have the names of any good specialist employment lawyers?
8