Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

11151161181201212262

Comments

  • Red_in_SE8
    Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961
    I think the developing scandal here is the state of independent investigative journalism in South East London. Local journalists are either incompetent, don't exist anymore or something more sinister is going on with regard to future advertising revenues.
  • Hex
    Hex Posts: 1,887

    Dread to think what Meire might tell any prospective buyer about us fans. Hopefully the other party/ parties will have the nous to do their own due diligence in that respect.

    Depends who the other party is.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    N01R4M said:

    Perhaps we’d better hope the potential buyers don’t subscribe to sportmagazine.knack.be, following @Weegie’s comprehensive exposure of Roland’s Mouthpiece as a compulsive liar!
    Or should that be DO subscribe?!

    I wouldn’t worry, after talking to her for a couple of minutes, they will know she is a liar.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,218

    I think the developing scandal here is the state of independent investigative journalism in South East London. Local journalists are either incompetent, don't exist anymore or something more sinister is going on with regard to future advertising revenues.

    Could do with someone like Peter Cordwell today. He didn't care what or who he may upset with his articles in the Mercury when we was away from the Valley.

    Top fella
  • Red does make a good point though. The complete radio silence on this very important “Charlton” issue is baffling. You would imagine that local football journalists would be all over this, yet nothing.
  • cafcwill
    cafcwill Posts: 1,286

    Red does make a good point though. The complete radio silence on this very important “Charlton” issue is baffling. You would imagine that local football journalists would be all over this, yet nothing.

    There could be an embargo? Like the deal has happened but they still have a few more i's to dot and t's to cross

    Or could be the fact there are only a few left

    hopefully we find out soon
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,218

    Red does make a good point though. The complete radio silence on this very important “Charlton” issue is baffling. You would imagine that local football journalists would be all over this, yet nothing.

    Paul Green, former News Shopper tweeted that it was true that the T******** was in progress.

    The only local jounalists now are Kent Live (click bait), Newshopper (pop up hell) and SLP. Only the SLP would run a story before it went public and they may be cautious not to upset/spoil the relationship with the club.

    If @Redhenry says it's true then that's enough for me.
  • Beardface said:

    Greenie said:

    DOUCHER said:

    I may have missed it but what exactly was the 'evidence' that brought about this new story of a takeover? Was it a DD document? Was it a letter to a bank? Was it word and mouth? What was it and why do we think its still ongoing? Obviously names can't be given but clarity on what form the information was in would at least help substantiate wouldn't it? My source says its a non story and isn't happening and that source would know. Whether that is or isn't true and the reasons for saying that, as Airman alluded to, could be indeed for good reason - i.e the post zabeel crash etc etc?? I don't know but my view is that RD does want out and has done since relegation / the change in strategy 18 months ago and if I was a betting man I'd say he will sell in the summer whether we go up or not with the up or not being the last part of the deal affecting the price.

    Tens of thousands of pounds have been spent and Meire has been actively involved this week, which would be odd for something that isn’t happening at all. I can’t give up the sources for obvious reasons but they are multiple, well placed and don’t know each other.
    Airmen, your choice, but I wouldn't respond to posts like this anymore mate.
    There's only one Airman Brown.
    Airman to that.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,734

    Red does make a good point though. The complete radio silence on this very important “Charlton” issue is baffling. You would imagine that local football journalists would be all over this, yet nothing.

    That's partly because it's not primarily a story about football, but one about business. They have much better contacts and access than me on the former, but when the club isn't talking on the latter it's hard for them to find a way in.
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    put things in perspe
    Croydon said:

    DOUCHER said:

    I may have missed it but what exactly was the 'evidence' that brought about this new story of a takeover? Was it a DD document? Was it a letter to a bank? Was it word and mouth? What was it and why do we think its still ongoing? Obviously names can't be given but clarity on what form the information was in would at least help substantiate wouldn't it? My source says its a non story and isn't happening and that source would know. Whether that is or isn't true and the reasons for saying that, as Airman alluded to, could be indeed for good reason - i.e the post zabeel crash etc etc?? I don't know but my view is that RD does want out and has done since relegation / the change in strategy 18 months ago and if I was a betting man I'd say he will sell in the summer whether we go up or not with the up or not being the last part of the deal affecting the price.

    Thanks

    Nobody knows other than a very few and I would suggest none of those post on this message board - you prat - the person who has told me what i know, does know but whether he is telling the truth, I don't know for sure - know what i mean!!!??? prat???
  • Sponsored links:



  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    Greenie said:

    DOUCHER said:

    I may have missed it but what exactly was the 'evidence' that brought about this new story of a takeover? Was it a DD document? Was it a letter to a bank? Was it word and mouth? What was it and why do we think its still ongoing? Obviously names can't be given but clarity on what form the information was in would at least help substantiate wouldn't it? My source says its a non story and isn't happening and that source would know. Whether that is or isn't true and the reasons for saying that, as Airman alluded to, could be indeed for good reason - i.e the post zabeel crash etc etc?? I don't know but my view is that RD does want out and has done since relegation / the change in strategy 18 months ago and if I was a betting man I'd say he will sell in the summer whether we go up or not with the up or not being the last part of the deal affecting the price.

    Tens of thousands of pounds have been spent and Meire has been actively involved this week, which would be odd for something that isn’t happening at all. I can’t give up the sources for obvious reasons but they are multiple, well placed and don’t know each other.
    Airmen, your choice, but I wouldn't respond to posts like this anymore mate.
    Posts like what? Asking what has actually given rise to 119 page thread?
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    So if they don't want it publicised if it is happening, i'm guessing the logic of leaking it and splashing it all over here, VOTV and the Mail etc is to try and pressurise it to go through or is it a quasi journalistic thing where people just have to be ITK / get the story out first? Would this not risk a post zabeel type slump or is the desire to get rid of RD so strong on here that if it scuppers the current good run the team is on, so be it?


  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    DOUCHER said:

    So if they don't want it publicised if it is happening, i'm guessing the logic of leaking it and splashing it all over here, VOTV and the Mail etc is to try and pressurise it to go through or is it a quasi journalistic thing where people just have to be ITK / get the story out first? Would this not risk a post zabeel type slump or is the desire to get rid of RD so strong on here that if it scuppers the current good run the team is on, so be it?


    How, exactly, would it scupper the team's good run? Amos is going to be so busy flipping through the pages of VOTV he lets 40 goals in? Ricky Holmes gets distracted due to his side-job as a financial auditor?
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,194
    DOUCHER said:

    Greenie said:

    DOUCHER said:

    I may have missed it but what exactly was the 'evidence' that brought about this new story of a takeover? Was it a DD document? Was it a letter to a bank? Was it word and mouth? What was it and why do we think its still ongoing? Obviously names can't be given but clarity on what form the information was in would at least help substantiate wouldn't it? My source says its a non story and isn't happening and that source would know. Whether that is or isn't true and the reasons for saying that, as Airman alluded to, could be indeed for good reason - i.e the post zabeel crash etc etc?? I don't know but my view is that RD does want out and has done since relegation / the change in strategy 18 months ago and if I was a betting man I'd say he will sell in the summer whether we go up or not with the up or not being the last part of the deal affecting the price.

    Tens of thousands of pounds have been spent and Meire has been actively involved this week, which would be odd for something that isn’t happening at all. I can’t give up the sources for obvious reasons but they are multiple, well placed and don’t know each other.
    Airmen, your choice, but I wouldn't respond to posts like this anymore mate.
    Posts like what? Asking what has actually given rise to 119 page thread?
    Hard to believe you have actually read the thread.
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    <
    Uboat said:

    DOUCHER said:

    Greenie said:

    DOUCHER said:

    I may have missed it but what exactly was the 'evidence' that brought about this new story of a takeover? Was it a DD document? Was it a letter to a bank? Was it word and mouth? What was it and why do we think its still ongoing? Obviously names can't be given but clarity on what form the information was in would at least help substantiate wouldn't it? My source says its a non story and isn't happening and that source would know. Whether that is or isn't true and the reasons for saying that, as Airman alluded to, could be indeed for good reason - i.e the post zabeel crash etc etc?? I don't know but my view is that RD does want out and has done since relegation / the change in strategy 18 months ago and if I was a betting man I'd say he will sell in the summer whether we go up or not with the up or not being the last part of the deal affecting the price.

    Tens of thousands of pounds have been spent and Meire has been actively involved this week, which would be odd for something that isn’t happening at all. I can’t give up the sources for obvious reasons but they are multiple, well placed and don’t know each other.
    Airmen, your choice, but I wouldn't respond to posts like this anymore mate.
    Posts like what? Asking what has actually given rise to 119 page thread?
    Hard to believe you have actually read the thread.
    Where else on this thread does it say that somebody in the finance department has leaked it? If that is the case I'm surprised Airman has landed somebody in it
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897

    DOUCHER said:

    So if they don't want it publicised if it is happening, i'm guessing the logic of leaking it and splashing it all over here, VOTV and the Mail etc is to try and pressurise it to go through or is it a quasi journalistic thing where people just have to be ITK / get the story out first? Would this not risk a post zabeel type slump or is the desire to get rid of RD so strong on here that if it scuppers the current good run the team is on, so be it?


    How, exactly, would it scupper the team's good run? Amos is going to be so busy flipping through the pages of VOTV he lets 40 goals in? Ricky Holmes gets distracted due to his side-job as a financial auditor?
    If its happening then, why else would they deny it?
  • zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz WUMs these days
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    DOUCHER said:

    DOUCHER said:

    So if they don't want it publicised if it is happening, i'm guessing the logic of leaking it and splashing it all over here, VOTV and the Mail etc is to try and pressurise it to go through or is it a quasi journalistic thing where people just have to be ITK / get the story out first? Would this not risk a post zabeel type slump or is the desire to get rid of RD so strong on here that if it scuppers the current good run the team is on, so be it?


    How, exactly, would it scupper the team's good run? Amos is going to be so busy flipping through the pages of VOTV he lets 40 goals in? Ricky Holmes gets distracted due to his side-job as a financial auditor?
    If its happening then, why else would they deny it?
    Who's denying what? I asked how you thought it would scupper the current good run the team is on.
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    Used to be a balanced forum where you could put an opposing opinion or offer up some information - hopefully will return to that once RD sells up.
  • Sponsored links:



  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897

    DOUCHER said:

    DOUCHER said:

    So if they don't want it publicised if it is happening, i'm guessing the logic of leaking it and splashing it all over here, VOTV and the Mail etc is to try and pressurise it to go through or is it a quasi journalistic thing where people just have to be ITK / get the story out first? Would this not risk a post zabeel type slump or is the desire to get rid of RD so strong on here that if it scuppers the current good run the team is on, so be it?


    How, exactly, would it scupper the team's good run? Amos is going to be so busy flipping through the pages of VOTV he lets 40 goals in? Ricky Holmes gets distracted due to his side-job as a financial auditor?
    If its happening then, why else would they deny it?
    Who's denying what? I asked how you thought it would scupper the current good run the team is on.
    the same way the zabeel deal collapse did - whatever that entails
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Can I get this right please?

    Are you saying our current good run will be scuppered by revelations that DD is going ahead at the Club or the run will be scuppered when the sale falls through?

    It's just that I'm thinking of starting a rumour about a sale on the West Ham site and I need to know which line of attack will bugger them up the most.
  • CHG
    CHG Posts: 4,529
    That is one long half term break.....
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    see you when it reaches 200 posts - just don't put your lives on hold waiting for the takeover, that's my advice.
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,125
    DOUCHER said:

    see you when it reaches 200 posts - just don't put your lives on hold waiting for the takeover, that's my advice.

    There's 3,500+ posts already mate. If you really can time travel can you conclusively tell me who killed JFK, it's been bugging me...
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    thanks fluff - pages
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    DOUCHER said:

    DOUCHER said:

    DOUCHER said:

    So if they don't want it publicised if it is happening, i'm guessing the logic of leaking it and splashing it all over here, VOTV and the Mail etc is to try and pressurise it to go through or is it a quasi journalistic thing where people just have to be ITK / get the story out first? Would this not risk a post zabeel type slump or is the desire to get rid of RD so strong on here that if it scuppers the current good run the team is on, so be it?


    How, exactly, would it scupper the team's good run? Amos is going to be so busy flipping through the pages of VOTV he lets 40 goals in? Ricky Holmes gets distracted due to his side-job as a financial auditor?
    If its happening then, why else would they deny it?
    Who's denying what? I asked how you thought it would scupper the current good run the team is on.
    the same way the zabeel deal collapse did - whatever that entails
    No, it didn't. That's ridiculous. The Zabeel deal collapsing didn't ruin our season, a combination of a team completely unfit for purpose and a manager who has a now comedically long history of being unable to arrest a slump once his two dimensional tactics are figured out did for us. There can't be a person who seriously thinks that a squad featuring Stuart Fleetwood, Dean Sinclair, Tresor Kandol and Matt Spring got relegated from the Championship because of the existential crisis brought on by Zabeel deciding they didn't fancy us after all
  • .
    DOUCHER said:

    Greenie said:

    DOUCHER said:

    I may have missed it but what exactly was the 'evidence' that brought about this new story of a takeover? Was it a DD document? Was it a letter to a bank? Was it word and mouth? What was it and why do we think its still ongoing? Obviously names can't be given but clarity on what form the information was in would at least help substantiate wouldn't it? My source says its a non story and isn't happening and that source would know. Whether that is or isn't true and the reasons for saying that, as Airman alluded to, could be indeed for good reason - i.e the post zabeel crash etc etc?? I don't know but my view is that RD does want out and has done since relegation / the change in strategy 18 months ago and if I was a betting man I'd say he will sell in the summer whether we go up or not with the up or not being the last part of the deal affecting the price.

    Tens of thousands of pounds have been spent and Meire has been actively involved this week, which would be odd for something that isn’t happening at all. I can’t give up the sources for obvious reasons but they are multiple, well placed and don’t know each other.
    Airmen, your choice, but I wouldn't respond to posts like this anymore mate.
    Posts like what? Asking what has actually given rise to 119 page thread?
    If you go against the grain, express independent or controversial thought or fail to tongue the right arses on here sometimes you're going to get shut down.

    Better to stay schtum and view the wank circle as a silent observer at times.

    :-)


This discussion has been closed.