To be fair not every one of our batsmen have played bad shots. One or two could say that they got a good one and our score is also a reflection of our choice of bowling attacks as it is our batting effort.
To be fair not every one of our batsmen have played bad shots. One or two could say that they got a good one and our score is also a reflection of our choice of bowling attacks as it is our batting effort.
Broad would have been really dangerous on this pitch. We only had 2 threatening bowlers yesterday
Rashyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.......................................................................................................................will get us past the follow on.
When the two teams were announced I said someone has got it wrong We went with two spinners and the Windies with none. Broad should have played and we should have gone with one spinner. This is the west Indies for God's sake not the sub continent.
Can understand the decision, bat us out of the game. To enforce the follow-on theoretically gives us best chance of winning by setting a 4th innings target. However I would have stuck us in again.
Boylesports apparently has the WI at 5/2 for this game (oddschecker). I'd open an account & stick my house on it, if I could find cricket betting on their site.
Comments
73-9
Could be over almost all over by tonught.
Tea taken.
We went with two spinners and the Windies with none.
Broad should have played and we should have gone with one spinner.
This is the west Indies for God's sake not the sub continent.
Hang on Sky getting conflicting info now......confusion reigns!
Simples
So, Jennings top scored then.!
"Come on boys. Let's spin ourselves to victory !"
I'd open an account & stick my house on it, if I could find cricket betting on their site.