another lil story hot from the press .. I travelled back on the bus with a chap who was talking with a member of the comms team .. latest theory ? .. we were 35 seconds (go on count 'em) late in the arrival of the paperwork at the FA end
another lil story hot from the press .. I travelled back on the bus with a chap who was talking with a member of the comms team .. latest theory ? .. we were 35 seconds (go on count 'em) late in the arrival of the paperwork at the FA end
We were late. Very much doubt Hemed will be our player.
another lil story hot from the press .. I travelled back on the bus with a chap who was talking with a member of the comms team .. latest theory ? .. we were 35 seconds (go on count 'em) late in the arrival of the paperwork at the FA end
We were late. Very much doubt Hemed will be our player.
it's being appealed .. as mentioned above somewhere, a decision will be made on Monday .. we all hope, one way or 'tother
Late is late whether it's a second or more so looks like we need to forget about it for now. Hopefully can revisit in January if we've got anything left in the pot.
Who amongst us has not had that dreaded message that Windows needs to shut down to complete the update? Maybe someone pushed the OK button rather than the postpone button for the 6th time that day?
Late is late whether it's a second or more so looks like we need to forget about it for now. Hopefully can revisit in January if we've got anything left in the pot.
Late is late whether it's a second or more so looks like we need to forget about it for now. Hopefully can revisit in January if we've got anything left in the pot.
Late is late whether it's a second or more so looks like we need to forget about it for now. Hopefully can revisit in January if we've got anything left in the pot.
Like I said earlier in the thread it might actually come down to the email or whatever being sent on time our side at 16:59 but not actually arriving with the FA until gone 17:00
It would sound like we're appealing we sent it before 17:00 even if it arrived after 17:00 but I have no idea on the rules and just speculating.
Late is late whether it's a second or more so looks like we need to forget about it for now. Hopefully can revisit in January if we've got anything left in the pot.
What I don't get is if we bid for a player in September, that player would be eligible for the selling club until January and then become our player in January. Surely if you miss the deadline then it becomes the same as that and the player is eligible for the selling club until their registration can be complete?
If it is a time issue I assume we can prove we sent the application ‘before’ the 5.00pm deadline? That being the case, we performed the procedure correctly, we cannot be held responsible for any time lag (no matter how long the time lag was), between pressing send and the email hitting The FA’s inbox. Can anyone shed anymore light regarding the legality of this phenomenon as it must occur time and again every day in all sorts of dealings and scenarios the world over. So, is it time sent on hitting send or time received in the recipients inbox that is considered to be the legally binding scenario? I would have thought it was the former.
What I don't get is if we bid for a player in September, that player would be eligible for the selling club until January and then become our player in January. Surely if you miss the deadline then it becomes the same as that and the player is eligible for the selling club until their registration can be complete?
I would guess because player registration is different from contractual commitment. We can take over a contract at any time I think (there is just no obvious reason to do it early); they just can't play until the window opens.
I can see a Roland meltdown statement coming if we are paying a player we can't play.
What I don't get is if we bid for a player in September, that player would be eligible for the selling club until January and then become our player in January. Surely if you miss the deadline then it becomes the same as that and the player is eligible for the selling club until their registration can be complete?
I would guess because player registration is different from contractual commitment. We can take over a contract at any time I think (there is just no obvious reason to do it early); they just can't play until the window opens.
I can see a Roland meltdown statement coming if we are paying a player we can't play.
Thanks for that, makes sense. As cfgs says, at least we have the option of loaning him out.
Comments
Sue Bill Gates I say.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11712/11191426/adrien-silva-completes-leicester-move-four-months-after-agreeing-deal
It would sound like we're appealing we sent it before 17:00 even if it arrived after 17:00 but I have no idea on the rules and just speculating.
Don't let the deadline day of excitement get to you, as we all know the situation we are in!
I get the rules are the rules, but how can it be beneficial to the player to have to wait 5 months to play competitive football.
https://t.co/b8FcDWzxkn
96 Tears by The Stranglers or It’s Too Late by Carole King.
Pity.
? And the Mysterions
That being the case, we performed the procedure correctly, we cannot be held responsible for any time lag (no matter how long the time lag was), between pressing send and the email hitting The FA’s inbox.
Can anyone shed anymore light regarding the legality of this phenomenon as it must occur time and again every day in all sorts of dealings and scenarios the world over.
So, is it time sent on hitting send or time received in the recipients inbox that is considered to be the legally binding scenario?
I would have thought it was the former.
I can see a Roland meltdown statement coming if we are paying a player we can't play.