Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

++ Tomer Hemed (p47 gone to New Zealand) ++

191012141549

Comments

  • thanks Dano and Large.
  • Dazzler21 said:
    The rules are i believe that we have submitted the paperwork so he's our player but his registration missed the deadline, we could loan him out to League 1 if we want him to stay sharp.
    Doubt he’s going to want to play League 1. More likely to be go abroad I reckon. 
    Cadiz?
  • Check out his missus..Shunit Faragi
    Phworrr.
  • Check out his missus..Shunit Faragi
    Phworrr.
    For that alone,  keep him!
  • Check out his missus..Shunit Faragi
    Phworrr.
    Sounds like a drunk driver trying to say they crashed into a Ferrari, but the young lady in question is delightful.
  • Hemed will be a one-year deal, if it happens. #cafc

  • Lee Bowyer has described Charlton’s hopes of being allowed to sign Tomer Hemed as 50-50 – with his deadline day move from Brighton going right to the wire for the transfer deadline cut-off.

    https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/lee-bowyer-gives-his-verdict-on-charltons-transfer-hopes-for-brighton-striker-hemed/
  • We sumited on time so did Brighton so cant see a problem??so hopefully another welcome addition at the valley
  • Cawley could be implying an appeal, if necessary, to the Court of Arbitration for Sport might be made, although Leicester took that route and failed. The facts will out and fingers crossed he is cleared to play for us without further action needing to be taken.
  • Sponsored links:


  • If the 5pm deadline is when the FA receive the necessary paperwork, it doesn't matter when it was sent.
  • RedChaser said:
    Cawley could be implying an appeal, if necessary, to the Court of Arbitration for Sport might be made, although Leicester took that route and failed. The facts will out and fingers crossed he is cleared to play for us without further action needing to be taken.
    The word at the Valley on Saturday was that we've already appealed.
  • Who amongst us has not had that dreaded message that Windows needs to shut down to complete the update? Maybe someone pushed the OK button rather than the postpone button for the 6th time that day?

    Sue Bill Gates I say. 
    Or make him buy us as punishment?
  • But if Brighton have released or release him now isn’t he a free agent so can sign out the window anyway 
  • But if Brighton have released or release him now isn’t he a free agent so can sign out the window anyway 
    Has to be released before the window closes. 
  • Check out his missus..Shunit Faragi
    Phworrr.
    Is her brother called Nigel?
  • edited August 2019
    If the 5pm deadline is when the FA receive the necessary paperwork, it doesn't matter when it was sent.
    Well that is completely ridiculous, sometimes I don’t get emails for quite a considerable time after they were sent........we all do from time to time of that I’m sure.
    I would suggest that if we can show the time our email was sent then that proves we sent the documents in time.....we have no control over the workings or maginations of the internet and as such one cannot think that The FA could make a judgment on a persons career in such an event.
    It is now well past mid-day and I would suggest that lawyers are now involved.........possibly on both sides of the dispute.
  • RedChaser said:
    Cawley could be implying an appeal, if necessary, to the Court of Arbitration for Sport might be made, although Leicester took that route and failed. The facts will out and fingers crossed he is cleared to play for us without further action needing to be taken.
    The word at the Valley on Saturday was that we've already appealed.
    In most procedures, an appeal follows an application not precedes it so from that I assume we received a knock back ?
  • Sponsored links:


  • RedChaser said:
    Cawley could be implying an appeal, if necessary, to the Court of Arbitration for Sport might be made, although Leicester took that route and failed. The facts will out and fingers crossed he is cleared to play for us without further action needing to be taken.
    The word at the Valley on Saturday was that we've already appealed.
    In most procedures, an appeal follows an application not precedes it so from that I assume we received a knock back ?
    Yes. As i said on Saturday.
  • If Brighton were due to pay a % of his wages at Charlton, could they not agree with the player to cancel his contract and pay said%, Leaving him able to sign for us on a free?
  • If Brighton were due to pay a % of his wages at Charlton, could they not agree with the player to cancel his contract and pay said%, Leaving him able to sign for us on a free?
    We were trying to get him on a permanent - not a loan.

    As I understand it - your suggestion could not work as his contract would also need to have been cancelled during the window.
  • If Brighton were due to pay a % of his wages at Charlton, could they not agree with the player to cancel his contract and pay said%, Leaving him able to sign for us on a free?
    No, as said before the player would have to be a free agent during the transfer window.  If they cancel his contract now we can't sign for another prem or league 1 club until January.
  • If Brighton were due to pay a % of his wages at Charlton, could they not agree with the player to cancel his contract and pay said%, Leaving him able to sign for us on a free 

    Players must be released by the end of the transfer window - so if he hasnt been released by 5pm on thursday he cant be a free agent. 
  • Cheers all, thought there must be a rule preventing it.
    without reading 12 pages is there a reason why he couldn’t be loaned to us?
  • If Brighton were due to pay a % of his wages at Charlton, could they not agree with the player to cancel his contract and pay said%, Leaving him able to sign for us on a free 

    Players must be released by the end of the transfer window - so if he hasnt been released by 5pm on thursday he cant be a free agent. 
    *wasnt released by 5pm last thursday 
  • Cheers all, thought there must be a rule preventing it.
    without reading 12 pages is there a reason why he couldn’t be loaned to us?
    During window.....he could have - but we already had the 5 that we can use in a match day squad.

    Now.....no...as outside the window
  • Cheers all, thought there must be a rule preventing it.
    without reading 12 pages is there a reason why he couldn’t be loaned to us?
    The window is closed 
  • Cheers all, thought there must be a rule preventing it.
    without reading 12 pages is there a reason why he couldn’t be loaned to us?
    Think he could of, but we were already up to 5 loans - the maximum allowed in a match day squad.  Any over 5 would mean they wouldn't be able to be selected.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!