Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
January 2020 transfer rumours thread (Deadline Day starts Page 283)
Comments
-
Toney & Maddison double swoop would be idealSwisdom said:Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic3 -
He wants £13m for ToneyPelling1993 said:
Toney & Maddison double swoop would be idealSwisdom said:Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic
hl probably get that but not from us0 -
Can't we just arrange a swap deal for Toney?Swisdom said:
He wants £13m for ToneyPelling1993 said:
Toney & Maddison double swoop would be idealSwisdom said:Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic
hl probably get that but not from us
We take Ivan Toney, they get Tony Keohane in return18 -
CAFC Media: Charlton Athletic are reportedly interested in Liverpool midfielder Herbie Kane. #cafc #lfc
4 -
How does CAFC media know? Aren't they run by a 15 year old?2
-
Yes and they don’t know necessarily. Although I have it on good authority we will be back in for him if we free up a loan spot.jacob_CAFC said:How does CAFC media know? Aren't they run by a 15 year old?0 -
Which surely we will, would be ridiculous if Kayal is kept on.cafcfan1990 said:
Yes and they don’t know necessarily. Although I have it on good authority we will be back in for him if we free up a loan spot.jacob_CAFC said:How does CAFC media know? Aren't they run by a 15 year old?6 -
You would imagine he’s off, be a massive risk to keep him and hold he comes goodTalal said:
Which surely we will, would be ridiculous if Kayal is kept on.cafcfan1990 said:
Yes and they don’t know necessarily. Although I have it on good authority we will be back in for him if we free up a loan spot.jacob_CAFC said:How does CAFC media know? Aren't they run by a 15 year old?0 -
Having 6 loan players for 5 spots wouldn't be a disaster, chances are that one of the loanees would be injured anyway1
-
killerandflash said:Having 6 loan players for 5 spots wouldn't be a disaster, chances are that 5 of the loanees would be injured anyway.
4 - Sponsored links:
-
Bringing players into a struggling side can be difficult for the newbies to fit in.LargeAddick said:In my opinion it’s worth splashing some cash in January if we are in contention for a play off spot as long as that cash is splashed on players you would sign next summer anyway.
I would err on the side of caution and budget for a splash in the summer.0 -
Lolricky_otto said:
He won’t be happy playing 2nd fiddle to SarrDOUCHER said:might be a bit early for van dijk - give it a couple of years0 -
Burnley in for Gallagher0
-
Not on your POTY list then?harveys_gardener said:Jason Pearce
1. Defends too deep so team harder to link with midfield2. May beat Rojo on a footrace because latter is hungover (24/7)
3. Octopus defending.
4. Poor passing, few forward, fewer finding man.
5. Dumped by every side winning promotion to Champ6. Barely more than six foot, doubt he'd have done better on Smith assault. Struggles against big physical forwards.0 -
Pappa was a lump when he was playing.markmc68 said:Mattie pollock at Grimsby has scouts in abundance looking at him. A really good classy young centre half who is ready to step up. His father is Jamie pollock once of. Middlesbrough and Manchester City. The old man is massively overweight these days but his son is class. Gallen get up and see this lad.0 -
A bit like Tony Watt then.Swisdom said:Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic0 -
J BLOCK said:Burnley in for Gallagher
They want him on a permanent deal according to the Daily Mail. Chelsea won't entertain letting him go unless they offer silly money.
3 -
Losing two of the ‘vertebrae’ from the spine of a side (in Taylor and Gallagher) is not what a newly promoted team at the wrong end of the table and on a bad run needs - regardless of potential Middle Eastern millions.13 -
No way would Gallagher himself go Burnley11
-
Gallagher is a Chelsea lad, more chance of us signing him then Burnley4
- Sponsored links:
-
Can see him as a future Chelsea first teamer. No need to sell/loan to Burnley.8
-
I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
3 -
They didn't do that last season for Abraham, Mount, James and Tomori last season though, they stayed at their loan clubs all season. Indeed Tammy Abraham probably suffered from having a PL loan too soon (Swansea)blackheathaddick said:I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.5 -
played against us last season for Donny .. for my part his performances were seriously underwhelmingForeverAddickted said:CAFC Media: Charlton Athletic are reportedly interested in Liverpool midfielder Herbie Kane. #cafc #lfc
1 -
Anyone, anyone?0
-
Burnley have a settled first XI. I expect they are up there in having the least changes week to week on their team sheet. Gallagher would have to be happy with the odd 10-20 minute cameo off the bench.blackheathaddick said:I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.Dyche also likes to play with known quantities who’ll give you 7/10 week on week and a young player like Conor doesn’t seem to fit with that ethos. Why would they bring him in for six months and shoehorn a player that doesn’t fit into their style of play?The only way a PL loan makes sense for Conor is it he gets regular minutes? Will he get that at Burnley? No.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.1 -
Fast approaching, if the takeover happens a LCB has to be a priority along with LB to challenge BP, CM and a forward.0
-
-
And Burnley's style of football hardly matches what Chelsea play and indeed what Bowyer (when everyone is fit) play either!Callumcafc said:
Burnley have a settled first XI. I expect they are up there in having the least changes week to week on their team sheet. Gallagher would have to be happy with the odd 10-20 minute cameo off the bench.blackheathaddick said:I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.Dyche also likes to play with known quantities who’ll give you 7/10 week on week and a young player like Conor doesn’t seem to fit with that ethos. Why would they bring him in for six months and shoehorn a player that doesn’t fit into their style of play?The only way a PL loan makes sense for Conor is it he gets regular minutes? Will he get that at Burnley? No.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.
Danny Drinkwater can't get a game at Burnley, which could hardly help their cause with Chelsea after...0 -
Danny Drinkwater is an arsehole, chelsea dont care if he's getting a game or not, they were banned from signing anyone and still farmed him out on loan.killerandflash said:
And Burnley's style of football hardly matches what Chelsea play and indeed what Bowyer (when everyone is fit) play either!Callumcafc said:
Burnley have a settled first XI. I expect they are up there in having the least changes week to week on their team sheet. Gallagher would have to be happy with the odd 10-20 minute cameo off the bench.blackheathaddick said:I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.Dyche also likes to play with known quantities who’ll give you 7/10 week on week and a young player like Conor doesn’t seem to fit with that ethos. Why would they bring him in for six months and shoehorn a player that doesn’t fit into their style of play?The only way a PL loan makes sense for Conor is it he gets regular minutes? Will he get that at Burnley? No.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.
Danny Drinkwater can't get a game at Burnley, which could hardly help their cause with Chelsea after...
0
