Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Portsmouth v Charlton | Post-match thread | Saturday 31st October 2020

145791012

Comments

  • PWR

    To all the doom-and-gloom merchants who thought pre-game that this would be the match we'd get found out, too many injuries and suspensions for us to cope with blah, blah, bloody blah ...

    Have some bloody faith in this group!!

    Yet another clean sheet, another match where we've scored a goal, five wins in a row.

    At this rate the chant should be '2-0 to the Charlton'.

    Everyone put in a decent shift and it was a well-deserved three points.

    The only down side was the injury to Akin - we're not having much luck in that department ... again.

    Five wins in a row, 16 points out of 18 in October with six successive clean sheets.

    We're on a roll.

  • Amos had some dodgy moments in possession but all keepers can have those. His handling was good. I think the booking was disapointing. I would urge him to let others waste the time. We don't really want to lose him for any games.
  • Leuth said:
    Stig said:
    Off_it said:
    MattF said:

    Boom, there's the graph again. 112-65. Cracking game.
    Ha ha, it's just so weird, isn't it. Just what is this 'Expected Goals' lark?  Surely if it was before the match the expected goals of a man who has not scored for 32 months would be 0.0; after the game, the expected goals of a man who has actually scored is 1.0 - 0.7 makes no sense whatsoever. And Portsmouth get 0.65 - does that mean Jonny Williams was rated as more likely to score than the whole Portsmouth team?  
    It tallies the likelihood of each shot to result in a goal. Williams was shooting from 3 yards out with no keeper so there was a nearly 0.8 probability of his chance ending up as a goal. The reason it wasn't higher? Not sure. But 0.8 is pretty much as high as Expected Goals will give for a chance 
    Thanks for the explanation but it still sounds like contrived nonsense to me. Is there some sort of table as to what's expected or not? Who is it that has these mysterious expectations and at what point in time do they have them? 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Nine hours, two minutes without conceding a goal... ...if you’re counting. #cafc

    image
  • Five wins on the spin for the first time since 2012
    Six clean sheets on the spin for the first time since 1998
    𝘽𝙤𝙬𝙮𝙚𝙧'𝙨 𝙗𝙤𝙮𝙨
  • Sponsored links:


  • 1 goal for Johnny
    2 nil
    3 points
    4 centre halves out
    5 wins in a row
    6 clean sheets in a row
    7 scorers of the ...
    8 goals in winning run
    9 hours without conceding
  • Great performance, great result. Every player worked hard and it was a great team performance. Playoffs look good which will be a great result this season.
  • edited October 2020
    Had he been sent off we couldn't have complained. But we would have anyway. :smile: Mind you, they couldn't have complained if we had been awarded a penalty!
  • Leuth said:
    Surprised at all the comments saying Pratley should have been off. I think it was a yellow but to get a red for that you need to make contact 
    So if you make a two footed, studs up challenge, and the opposition player is fortunate enough to jump out the way just in time you don't think it should be a red - even though the intent was the same?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!