Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Being called a racist on Saturday.

1468910

Comments

  • edited August 2021
    Leuth said:
    Princess Fiona lives in SA, which is its own colossal clusterfuck of race relations, tbf to her
    I don't any more and yes, one of the instances was in SA by another white person; an Afrikaner. Another was in .Pakistan, where I can assure you I was very much in the minority.

    But my point about being shut down previously elsewhere CL, not sure if I have referred to this previously on here, but may have on the Harry and Megan thread) was that when I had said I had some understanding of being the recipient of racism, but I was shut down (rudely and dismissively I might add) was it was assumed I couldn't have, as am white. The circs were not even asked about.

    The dangers os assumptions - on all side, that is
  • I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
  • Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    But he should know the difference and should be called to account if he has wrongly called someone a racist for zero reason. All sorts of people can be verbally and physically abused for all sorts of reasons, but it is no reason to wrongly accuse someone of such serious matter
  • Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


  • Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
  • edited August 2021
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    It seems that you are still questioning @whe@WhenIwasLittleBoy
    You clearly do not accept what he is saying.
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    It seems that you are still questioning @whe@WhenIwasLittleBoy
    You clearly do not accept what he is saying.
    No, I accept the story as it's been told. I just don't remotely understand why anyone would act like that short of an actual psychological condition, in which case they'd need help more than censure 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Being called a racist on Saturday.


    Craig David lyrics?


    They chilled on Sunday….
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Your the man with the answers….what I can say and felt it would be unfair of me to stereotype, but he had a chip on his shoulder and was clearly someone who was confrontational. Would you really go and confront someone and continue to be abusive in front of your boss, and when he tells you to leave you continue  to provoke? When your colleagues try to move you on you tell them to get their hands off you.
    The hard facts are is that is not the run of the mill steward and to call me a racist in front of my daughter and you are making excuses for him then I think you need to have a look at yourself 

    What response were you hoping for when you started this thread?  

  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Your the man with the answers….what I can say and felt it would be unfair of me to stereotype, but he had a chip on his shoulder and was clearly someone who was confrontational. Would you really go and confront someone and continue to be abusive in front of your boss, and when he tells you to leave you continue  to provoke? When your colleagues try to move you on you tell them to get their hands off you.
    The hard facts are is that is not the run of the mill steward and to call me a racist in front of my daughter and you are making excuses for him then I think you need to have a look at yourself 
    No there's no excuse but he sounds like a mess and I was just trying to imagine why he'd have such a strong reaction. As has been repeatedly stated here though, I shouldn't assume anything. He probably won't be back for the next game and we can all get on with it. 
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Your the man with the answers….what I can say and felt it would be unfair of me to stereotype, but he had a chip on his shoulder and was clearly someone who was confrontational. Would you really go and confront someone and continue to be abusive in front of your boss, and when he tells you to leave you continue  to provoke? When your colleagues try to move you on you tell them to get their hands off you.
    The hard facts are is that is not the run of the mill steward and to call me a racist in front of my daughter and you are making excuses for him then I think you need to have a look at yourself 

    What response were you hoping for when you started this thread?  

    A sensible one
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    It seems that you are still questioning @whe@WhenIwasLittleBoy
    You clearly do not accept what he is saying.
    No, I accept the story as it's been told. I just don't remotely understand why anyone would act like that short of an actual psychological condition, in which case they'd need help more than censure 
    You obviously haven't followed your own advice and spoken to and listened to the community.  False claims of racism are far, far, to common.  They do nothing to foward the anti racist cause.  They are heavily fround apon by the community as they devalue the very real racism that exists.

    I have just realised I have assumed the person involved is black only because you said "if he was a black britton". 
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    It seems that you are still questioning @whe@WhenIwasLittleBoy
    You clearly do not accept what he is saying.
    No, I accept the story as it's been told. I just don't remotely understand why anyone would act like that short of an actual psychological condition, in which case they'd need help more than censure 
    Have you never just been in a shit mood and been a bit of an arsehole to someone?

    There doesn’t always have to be some deep-set reason or psychological back story. 
    Not in such a sustained and bizarre manner. This thread notwithstanding ;) 
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Your the man with the answers….what I can say and felt it would be unfair of me to stereotype, but he had a chip on his shoulder and was clearly someone who was confrontational. Would you really go and confront someone and continue to be abusive in front of your boss, and when he tells you to leave you continue  to provoke? When your colleagues try to move you on you tell them to get their hands off you.
    The hard facts are is that is not the run of the mill steward and to call me a racist in front of my daughter and you are making excuses for him then I think you need to have a look at yourself 

    What response were you hoping for when you started this thread?  

    A sensible one
  • e! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    It seems that you are still questioning @whe@WhenIwasLittleBoy
    You clearly do not accept what he is saying.
    No, I accept the story as it's been told. I just don't remotely understand why anyone would act like that short of an actual psychological condition, in which case they'd need help more than censure 
    Personally I have witnessed it/am aware of it happening lots of times, for no reason.  I'm aware of a number of people who think any criticism of a person of colour is racism.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    It seems that you are still questioning @whe@WhenIwasLittleBoy
    You clearly do not accept what he is saying.
    No, I accept the story as it's been told. I just don't remotely understand why anyone would act like that short of an actual psychological condition, in which case they'd need help more than censure 
    You obviously haven't followed your own advice and spoken to and listened to the community.  False claims of racism are far, far, to common.  They do nothing to foward the anti racist cause.  They are heavily fround apon by the community as they devalue the very real racism that exists.

    I have just realised I have assumed the person involved is black only because you said "if he was a black britton". 
    Fair play. 
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Surely its entirely possible that he was a fool , or stupid , or a bad person. I'm struggling why that is so difficult to conceive as a possibility ?
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Your the man with the answers….what I can say and felt it would be unfair of me to stereotype, but he had a chip on his shoulder and was clearly someone who was confrontational. Would you really go and confront someone and continue to be abusive in front of your boss, and when he tells you to leave you continue  to provoke? When your colleagues try to move you on you tell them to get their hands off you.
    The hard facts are is that is not the run of the mill steward and to call me a racist in front of my daughter and you are making excuses for him then I think you need to have a look at yourself 

    What response were you hoping for when you started this thread?  

    A sensible one
    And what would that have looked like?

    An incident occurred. You reported it. Then you started a thread on CL.

    For what reason?
  • holyjo said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    I didn't mean you! I was just responding to your question. I was more addressing blackpool and the others who expressed skepticism that the steward in question had actually been racially abused in the past
    Rather than trying to make a defence for someone when A You wasn’t there. B You don’t know him C or are second guessing what may have happened to him in the past, let me spell this out to you.

    He was the aggressor, both towards myself and father at the end. There was no aggression towards him whatsoever and there certainly was not a racist comment. 


    I accept this of course! But why was he like that? What did he stand to gain? It's doing my head in a bit 
    Surely its entirely possible that he was a fool , or stupid , or a bad person. I'm struggling why that is so difficult to conceive as a possibility ?
    It's entirely possible that any of the people involved in the incident were.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!