Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer 2022 transfer rumours (Gilbey loan confirmed p513, a signing falls through last minute p541)

1…9091939596…569

Comments

  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,756
    NabySarr said:
    Assuming we are returning to a back 4 then for centre back we have Lavelle, Inniss and Deji which is 3 good options for the right side, we just need a couple of left sided ones. Ness played national league south last season so I doubt he is going to step straight into our squad but does seem odd if we've kept him so maybe he will be involved 
    I actually followed Ness a bit in his loan as always been a fan of his watching and their fans said he was comfortably leagues above them and was reportedly being tracked by teams higher up the pyramid.

    He may go out on loan again but I would like him  try and earn his chance in pre season.
  • swordfish
    swordfish Posts: 4,234
    edited June 2022
    golfaddick said:
    swordfish said:
    FishCostaFortune said:
    Didn't someone closeish to Marquis basically say it was a done deal a while ago? 
    Yes, and if that is true, he's better back up than JD imo, but not if he's coming in as CW's replacement. 
    I doubt he'd sign knowing that he would be starting on the bench most weeks.

    We already have Stockley, Davison & Aneke - all big lads. We need something different. 
    Agreed, so possibly Davison to go out and a modern day Paul Williams type to come in as first choice pairing with Stockley. It worries me if Marquis does arrive as first choice despite him doing well at Donny, and he doesn't sound a good fit for BG's MO.

    I guess they might have worked together at that other place, but I'm hoping the rumour is unfounded.

    He'll probably be signing tomorrow then 😎
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    edited June 2022
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




  • Richard J
    Richard J Posts: 8,033
    Is Ness left footed? 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,323
    Richard J said:
    Is Ness left footed? 
    Think thats a bit of a myth
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


  • Rylo
    Rylo Posts: 860
    Richard J said:
    Is Ness left footed? 
    I don’t care, we just need to Loch this transfer in. 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Also just realised I put MacGillivray in goal, would prefer AMB to be given a chance or a new GK bought in that is better with the ball at his feet for Garner-ball
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,377
    RC_CAFC said:
    NabySarr said:
    Assuming we are returning to a back 4 then for centre back we have Lavelle, Inniss and Deji which is 3 good options for the right side, we just need a couple of left sided ones. Ness played national league south last season so I doubt he is going to step straight into our squad but does seem odd if we've kept him so maybe he will be involved 
    I actually followed Ness a bit in his loan as always been a fan of his watching and their fans said he was comfortably leagues above them and was reportedly being tracked by teams higher up the pyramid.

    He may go out on loan again but I would like him  try and earn his chance in pre season.
    The club clearly have confidence in Ness, he's been here two years and we've given him a two year contract. Agree we should give him a chance in preseason and go from there. If he's not quite ready get him on loan again in League 2 or the National League.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,323
    Glad we kept him around as think there was rumour of interest from Bournemouth and another club (Norwich maybe)
  • Sponsored links:



  • PowellsHeadedGoal
    PowellsHeadedGoal Posts: 54
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I can't see how that team finishes any higher than last season's shambles. Making me even more depressed than the England game!
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,256
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    Bleak :-(
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 
    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 
     Could definitely be right about 4-3-3, I wouldn't be so sure about the overhaul.

    We allegedly have a lot of irons in the fire and whilst I assume most targets won't come off, I think we'll be pleased with the calibre of those that do.

    I'm probably incorrect, but I expect around 10 new players, 3-5 as loans and 5-7 as permies. (Nothing to back that up btw, just more assumptions)

  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    PowellsHeadedGoal said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I can't see how that team finishes any higher than last season's shambles. Making me even more depressed than the England game!
    Probably because it won't be the final side going into the new season. 

    Going into the new season I expect Morgan, F.Caskey and Clare to also have competition/be replaced in the above positions with better. Plus any loans... I am mildly confident that we'll be alright. 
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,377
    cabbles said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    Bleak :-(
    I don't think our starting line up will look anything like that by the time we've got most of our signings in (so maybe September...). We need most of them to be first choice players. It should be obvious to Garner we can't build a starting 11 and play his style of football with the current squad.

    I think a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 is also more likely and expect CBT to be a starter.
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,884
    RodneyCharltonTrotta said:
    NabySarr said:
    Assuming we are returning to a back 4 then for centre back we have Lavelle, Inniss and Deji which is 3 good options for the right side, we just need a couple of left sided ones. Ness played national league south last season so I doubt he is going to step straight into our squad but does seem odd if we've kept him so maybe he will be involved 
    Is Innis not left footed?
    Only if it's aimed at an afc Wimbledon players chest
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. The defence needs a big overhaul but if we get that right then this is a decent team, not promotion contenders but certainly not bottom 8 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,349
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. 
    Fraser and Dobson are good for this level...
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    Chunes said:
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. 
    Fraser and Dobson are good for this level...
    Forster-Caskey if he gets back to the level he was in 20-21 is on a similar level to those. I think people forget how good he was 
  • Sponsored links:



  • BigRedEvil
    BigRedEvil Posts: 11,071
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. The defence needs a big overhaul but if we get that right then this is a decent team, not promotion contenders but certainly not bottom 8 
    That midfield has never played together, Fraser has done nothing so far to suggest he'll be good anyway for us. And between him and JFC I don't see them staying fit enough over a full season We need strethening in every position 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    BigRedEvil said:
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. The defence needs a big overhaul but if we get that right then this is a decent team, not promotion contenders but certainly not bottom 8 
    That midfield has never played together, Fraser has done nothing so far to suggest he'll be good anyway for us. And between him and JFC I don't see them staying fit enough over a full season We need strethening in every position 
    Fraser came to us unfit, then got covid, then played after covid which affected him badly as he has asthma and he had cysts on his knee from it or something. Judging him on that is a bit harsh. We definitely need 1 or 2 more central midfielders in as I don’t think Gilbey or Morgan are good enough but if that is our starting 3 on July 30th I’ll be happy with that 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,349
    edited June 2022
    NabySarr said:
    Chunes said:
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. 
    Fraser and Dobson are good for this level...
    Forster-Caskey if he gets back to the level he was in 20-21 is on a similar level to those. I think people forget how good he was 
    Yeah, I like JFC. All I know is that last season, our midfield got played off the park by the likes of Morecambe and just about anyone else you can name. Will be the same problem if we're starting with the same players we did last year.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    Chunes said:
    NabySarr said:
    Chunes said:
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. 
    Fraser and Dobson are good for this level...
    Forster-Caskey if he gets back to the level he was in 20-21 is on a similar level to those. I think people forget how good he was 
    Yeah, I like JFC. All I know is that last season, our midfield got played off the park by the likes of Morecambe and just about anyone else you can name. Will be the same problem if we're starting with the same players we did last year.
    And that’s why we need to upgrade on Gilbey and Morgan. Fraser and JFC barely played last season so can’t blame them for that. The year before they were 2 of the best central midfielders in the league so those 2 and Dobson I think is a very good midfield 3, just need better than Gilbey/Morgan for when JFC inevitably does his ACL in the first game 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,349
    NabySarr said:
    Chunes said:
    NabySarr said:
    Chunes said:
    NabySarr said:
    wmcf123 said:
    NabySarr said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen him do well there.

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    I think 4-3-3 is a lot more likely as it is what Garner used at Swindon most and suits what we have more. 

    Macca

    Clare- Lavelle - NEW - NEW 

    JFC - Dobson - Fraser 

    CBT - Stockley - Kirk 

    would probably want a new starting RB, CM, winger and striker instead of half of these if possible but probably unlikely to be that much overhaul 


    Bottom 8
    It’s not that bad is it? That midfield 3 is very good for this level. 
    Fraser and Dobson are good for this level...
    Forster-Caskey if he gets back to the level he was in 20-21 is on a similar level to those. I think people forget how good he was 
    Yeah, I like JFC. All I know is that last season, our midfield got played off the park by the likes of Morecambe and just about anyone else you can name. Will be the same problem if we're starting with the same players we did last year.
    And that’s why we need to upgrade on Gilbey and Morgan. Fraser and JFC barely played last season so can’t blame them for that. The year before they were 2 of the best central midfielders in the league so those 2 and Dobson I think is a very good midfield 3, just need better than Gilbey/Morgan for when JFC inevitably does his ACL in the first game 
    Agree with that 110%.
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,314
    edited June 2022
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    If you want to get promoted Clare shouldn’t be a first 11 player. 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    J BLOCK said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Our defensive three will likely be: Lavelle - Inniss - *New*. I hope Clare can come into either the RWB position or CM and can still be utilised as a CB in emergency. 

    I expect our first team may look something like this over the next week:

    M.Brewer
    Lavelle - Inniss - New
    Clare - Morgan - Dobson- Fraser - F.Caskey
    New - Stockley 

    ...and I genuinely felt a bit sad not typing Washington there. It also feels a mess with a CM at LWB & RWB respectively, but we have seen them both do well there.

    I would also assume that B.Taylor & Aneke will be available from the bench (hopefully MacG also demoted to the bench)

    I have no inside info other than two new players inbound and that was from Mr ButtleJR who keeps getting bits right. 




    If you want to get promoted Clare shouldn’t be a first team player.
    I don't expect him to be come first game of the season/close of the window. I disagree though as a RCB he was one of our best players last season, wasn't he second or third to Dobson/Dobson & Stockley?
  • Oh Eddie Youds...
    Oh Eddie Youds... Posts: 1,320
    RCB is his best position. Although he has the engine to get up and down I don’t see him whipping in crosses etc as a wing back.

    Also don’t think he’s up to being a CM….he’s failed to make that position his own at both Oxford and Charlton now.
  • Athletico Charlton
    Athletico Charlton Posts: 14,276
    https://the72.co.uk/275640/reading-drop-out-of-chase-for-gillingham-defender-jack-tucker/
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,288
    Oh Eddie Youds... said:
    RCB is his best position. Although he has the engine to get up and down I don’t see him whipping in crosses etc as a wing back.

    Also don’t think he’s up to being a CM….he’s failed to make that position his own at both Oxford and Charlton now.
    I agree, think he could do ok as right back in a back 4 as well. But I don’t think he should start for a team aiming to go up, if we are serious about promotion then he should just be a useful versatile squad player 

Categories

“Marketplace”