Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Post-match Thread: Charlton Athletic vs Oxford United | Saturday 1st October 2022 - 3pm KO

15791011

Comments

  • Closest effort first half was my dad’s attempt at the crossbar challenge!
    I’ll be honest I thought “fuck off let your son take it” (was it you? ) and it was a great attempt and he got a round of applause from me , deffo the highlight of the day , especially with some of the real shit attempts we’ve seen in the last year .
    thanks dad 👍
    Cheers oohaah, he couldn’t let me take it cos I’ve a brother who was also with us so we convinced the old man to have a go, he’s 66 this year so he was happy he got it off the floor!
    I know it’s fcuked up thinking because a monkey is much much better than nothing but I think psychologically, yesterday was the perfect outcome because had he hit ,if it was me, all I’d have been thinking is ffs would have been £12k if that fella had missed last time and would have done my noggin in but that’s cos I’m always looking for a cloud in every silver lining !!
  • edited October 2022
    Any particular reason Browne give it to the covered end after scoring 
    We were closely linked with him in Jan 2022 but apparently pulled out of a deal. Expect it was a bit of anger about how he was treated back then.

    Thought he looked a decent player yesterday. Him & Brannigan were strong in the middle of the park.
  • There is too much apathy at Charlton athletic and what we should do is...  I can't be arsed.
  • Kips said:
    cabster said:

    Not sure that CBT can be AWOL and left out by Garner. It's one or the other surely.....

    This bombing of players out of the 18 is becoming a bit of a feature of Garner"s tenure. He did the same with Kirk recently. I wonder if by trying to make a point to raise the standards he is actually cutting off his nose to spite his face. A flyer like CBT on for the last 10 mins yesterday could have brought us fresh impetus and 3 points, especially as by that point Rak-Sak was blowing out of his crack.
    The second time in 11 games where he's come out and said that, which is concerning. And JRS for all his skills, is hardly someone who tracks back and does lots of defensive work either,

    There's no consistency in team selection or team shape at the moment, and who even features in the 18. This week Morgan isn't even on the bench, but if Garner thought he was that bad last Saturday, why was he the only one of the 3 midfielders to play the full 90 against Barnsley, with both Fraser and Dobson being subbed?
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited October 2022
    There are quite a few people on here debating Charlton's risk of relegation from this division, I think that there is a very real danger of this happening . Last season our three main strikers were out injured, our form plummeted when those injuries happened, since then Sandgaard in his infinite wisdom has removed one of those options in Washington. We are now down to one fit striker, please don't tell me Aneke will be fit, that one striker will be, at some point, suspended, injured or even sold. Sandgaard will not buy or loan replacements so not only has he tied the managers hands behind his back with regards to options up front and systems but he has also given him no real prospect of adequate cover in the event of the inevitable happening. 
  • win at Lincoln or .. Garner OUT 
  • BertieB said:
    clive said:
    WTF. Where is the Dobson chance at the end?!
    That was my thinking. They showed it on ITV last night. 
  • DOUCHER said:
    Oxford have the slowest right back in world football so we decide to drop CBT - great!! Leaburn and Stockley up top has to be the way forward until the january window. Not having a threat in behind up top is killing us as much as the passing it round the back boreathon football. 442 and give ourselves half a chance of not getting sucked into a relegation battle - i like egbo - i reckon you could play him in most positions and he'd be better than who is currently there.
    Doucher, do you think Sandgaard will use the window to bring in players ? I think that would only happen if it was cost neutral which means players leaving, that didn't happen in the summer why would it happen in January ?
  • 9 points from 11 games 2021
    12 points from 11 games 2022
    25% improvement 
    Happy days
  • Think anyone slagging off Garner for this season has picked up all the wrong signals from the past 5 or so years. 

    When every single manager we try can't get a squad to play above mid-tier League One football. The problem is elsewhere. 
    Understand what your saying but that first half set up was so disjointed and open defensively I was starting to wonder how a team could be so badly coached.

    Second half was better and we did look defensively at least less open. Lavelle was hopeless first half and Payne is not a wide man, did they even practice that formation as it looked like it was slung together 10 minutes before kick off.


    Please Garner 4 fucking 4 fucking 2 and give us a chance of winning.
    I thought it would be weird if going to a more “open formation” in 4-4-2 would’ve actually made us more solid so I had to check the stats.


    Oxford had more shots in the second half than they did in the first. They didn’t have a single shot from inside the penalty area in the first half, they had four of them in the second half.

    Oxford enjoyed more attacking opportunities against us after the formation change. It only felt better to us fans because in the first half we offered zero ourselves.

    When in fact the first half was a 45 minutes of effectively complete nothing from both sides, aside from one long range strike.
    the football is so frustrating and feels so unnatural its painful to watch - i had lots of new faces with me - friends who came to watch our friends boy who was playing for oxford and they all said the same - the turning back and going round the defence with the ball even when in decent positions to go forwards just wasn't right and having no pace up top meant the defence could push up and close down (refuse to say press!!!) what we were trying to do with no fear of the through ball - basic, basic stuff 
  • Bailey said:
    DOUCHER said:
    Oxford have the slowest right back in world football so we decide to drop CBT - great!! Leaburn and Stockley up top has to be the way forward until the january window. Not having a threat in behind up top is killing us as much as the passing it round the back boreathon football. 442 and give ourselves half a chance of not getting sucked into a relegation battle - i like egbo - i reckon you could play him in most positions and he'd be better than who is currently there.
    Doucher, do you think Sandgaard will use the window to bring in players ? I think that would only happen if it was cost neutral which means players leaving, that didn't happen in the summer why would it happen in January ?
    i'm not saying he will, i'm just talking about what we can do until then - what we can do and will do are 2 different things unfortunately 
  • DOUCHER said:
    Think anyone slagging off Garner for this season has picked up all the wrong signals from the past 5 or so years. 

    When every single manager we try can't get a squad to play above mid-tier League One football. The problem is elsewhere. 
    Understand what your saying but that first half set up was so disjointed and open defensively I was starting to wonder how a team could be so badly coached.

    Second half was better and we did look defensively at least less open. Lavelle was hopeless first half and Payne is not a wide man, did they even practice that formation as it looked like it was slung together 10 minutes before kick off.


    Please Garner 4 fucking 4 fucking 2 and give us a chance of winning.
    I thought it would be weird if going to a more “open formation” in 4-4-2 would’ve actually made us more solid so I had to check the stats.


    Oxford had more shots in the second half than they did in the first. They didn’t have a single shot from inside the penalty area in the first half, they had four of them in the second half.

    Oxford enjoyed more attacking opportunities against us after the formation change. It only felt better to us fans because in the first half we offered zero ourselves.

    When in fact the first half was a 45 minutes of effectively complete nothing from both sides, aside from one long range strike.
    the football is so frustrating and feels so unnatural its painful to watch - i had lots of new faces with me - friends who came to watch our friends boy who was playing for oxford and they all said the same - the turning back and going round the defence with the ball even when in decent positions to go forwards just wasn't right and having no pace up top meant the defence could push up and close down (refuse to say press!!!) what we were trying to do with no fear of the through ball - basic, basic stuff 
    That annoyed me. Going forward, options to try and get in among their defence, and in three passes, we had the ball back over the halfway line and our back four were playing it around with the entire Oxford team between them and the goal. We did the same all over the pitch, occasionally avoiding the chance to play a  winger in and counter attack to play a safe ball to a Charlton player in a nowhere situation, and then lose possession anyway. Points to a huge lack of confidence.
  • Imagine those that had £33 for the pleasure to watch yesterday’s game. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited October 2022
    Parallel universe:

    McGillivray 8 solid as a rock.
    Clare 7.5 so much energy as an attacking RB and nevers makes a mistake.
    Deji: 8.5 hope we can hold on to this ball playing CB.
    Lavelle 7.5 like a young Pearce in a 4 at the back but without the Rugby tackles !
    Clayden 7 left footed: enough said.
    Morgan 9  +1 for the 35 yard screamer that he scored. The keeper didn't move as he assumed the shot would end up in Row Z.
    JFC 8 one paced but the Liam Brady clone ran the show.
    Henry 8  king Henry was majestic and no way should he get the chop after this performance.
    Washington 9 +1 for the he way he took that one on one with the keeper at the end was a great climax to a big win. So pleased that TS gave him the contract.
    Stockley 8.5 a better player when he has a player close in a two and especially a forward who can run on in behind.
    CBT 9 The x factor player who went past his markers with ease. Great composure when he see the goalposts. 

    Sub: Aneke 8.5 superb 30 minute cameo and far to strong for the defenders. Unlucky with winning the crossbar challenge 4 times and hitting the upright twice. Should only be out for six weeks after pulling a muscle doing the tunnel jump.
  • Think anyone slagging off Garner for this season has picked up all the wrong signals from the past 5 or so years. 

    When every single manager we try can't get a squad to play above mid-tier League One football. The problem is elsewhere. 
    Understand what your saying but that first half set up was so disjointed and open defensively I was starting to wonder how a team could be so badly coached.

    Second half was better and we did look defensively at least less open. Lavelle was hopeless first half and Payne is not a wide man, did they even practice that formation as it looked like it was slung together 10 minutes before kick off.


    Please Garner 4 fucking 4 fucking 2 and give us a chance of winning.
    I thought it would be weird if going to a more “open formation” in 4-4-2 would’ve actually made us more solid so I had to check the stats.


    Oxford had more shots in the second half than they did in the first. They didn’t have a single shot from inside the penalty area in the first half, they had four of them in the second half.

    Oxford enjoyed more attacking opportunities against us after the formation change. It only felt better to us fans because in the first half we offered zero ourselves.

    When in fact the first half was a 45 minutes of effectively complete nothing from both sides, aside from one long range strike.
    442 made us more threatening, but also more open. Oxford are :-

    a) not that good this season
    b) got knackered in the second half

    So didn't exploit the extra space very well.

    Yes we were better in the second half, but I would really worry about playing with just 2 in midfield against one of the top 6 teams. 
    Agreed. Oxford have similar issues to us in terms of scoring goals. 4-4-2 is not the answer anymore. I think we will have to compromise but the solution is probably an unbalanced system with one wing back and one wide man so Leaburn can support Stockley.
  • No consistency in team selection is hurting us. Consequently,  the players selected are not familiar enough with their colleagues style of play. The passing is too slow . Movement is too slow as players are being pressed hard and failing to show themselves for a pass. This gives the opposition plenty of time to get into position to nullify our forward play.

    The goal kicks and drop kicks are almost hilarious. No one appears to know what to do. How about mixing it sometimes and going for a quick long kick to start a surprise attack. You can see that they have been told it must be played out from the back regardless. Bad passes to tightly marked players occur often as oppositions are now aware of this and press hard to take advantage. It is not working. We are not getting out of defence quick enough. We are making blunders. Sooner or later we will start conceeding goals. 

    Yesterday Oxford played quicker and found their players well whilst attacking. They looked a settled side. Garner seems to satisfy himself that because the stats show his system is working it is still the system to pursue - regardless. It is not working. We are not winning. The players look confused and are finding it difficult to employ - all the time! It is like we are playing in a straight jacket with no flexibility. The moves often break down long before we get anywhere near the penalty box and we make very few opportunities to have a shot. 
     
    I am beginning to think Garner is not expansive enough with his tatics and I do not like his "teacher-like" dicipline punishing good players by leaving them out of the squad. Yesterday we could have benefitted by bringing on CBT to run at their flagging defence in the last 20 minutes. Just poor decision making to deal with the CBT problem like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

  • So Garner dropped Morgan from the squad. He must not have seen his FotMob rating  ;)
  • timken said:
    9 points from 11 games 2021
    12 points from 11 games 2022
    25% improvement 
    Happy days
    33.33% recurring 😉
    Exactly! The standard of maths in this country these days .....
  • edited October 2022
    timken said:
    9 points from 11 games 2021
    12 points from 11 games 2022
    25% improvement 
    Happy days

    Gallows humour, magic on a Sunday morning.
    20 points from Johnnie Jackson's first 10 games in charge when he realised that 4-3-3 wouldn't work most games with Stockley isolated and Conor Washington out wide.

    Of course we Couldn't go higher than mid table that JJ got us too because we weren't good enough and had weaknesses in several positions. 

    My views as we go into October are the same as they were when we kicked off the season. We are a mid table team unless we get the right combination in our forwards to at least get us out of jail at times with some finishing which full time players should be capable off when you have the luxury of training every day with the tools of your trade: A football not an effing grenade that's needs to be hurled into row z.
    At the moment we need to improve to finish in the top 12.

    I said we would be the draw specialists back in August and we are joint top with 6 draws from the 11 games.  

    With no Jason Euell at Cafc now was there no one to tell Ben Garner that other when we play Plymouth, Jayden Stockley struggled in a 3 when he is isolated ? 

    I would liked to have thought that Ben Garner would have worked that out for himself before August was finished. Catch 22 now because Garner was hired because at the interview he and the guitar man were singing the same song about how to play football 

    No way can Sandgaard sack Garner as it would reflect badly on him.
  • Garner generally has the look of someone sold an absolute pup. The whole set up is toxic, compounded by years of toxicity.  

    I fear the slide into obscurity as much as i am currently resigned to it.

    Happy Sunday everyone!
  • Garner is partly culpable here and remains on the register of those not seeing at least another striker as being absolutely THE critical signing - he signed lots of other players but didn’t sign THE player most needed - we had many on here who saw a centre half it left back as more critical but for a professional to not push that signing through forcefully is beyond belief 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!