Why anyone would clap Innis off is beyond me. Get rid of him ffs, gave the ball away twice under no pressure whatsoever and then rightly gets sent off.
Absurd comment. This is a blip - he has them. The rest of the time he's dominant. How did we win 3 games in a row with him in the side, playing well, if he's that bad?
The fact he's effectively been sent off four times in 41-games for us, shows he can be a massive liability for us - Its great that he's finally finding some fitness, but people talk about Stockley being a disciplinary liability when he's booked is laughable.
Inniss... Now THAT is a liability on a yellow card...
How can you be sent off four times, in less games than what make up a season?
good comments ,, he's one of those players who just will not learn, he sees red, the mists come down and there you go .. I was praising him a short while back, BUT it seems he will not learn, like try teaching a pitbull not to bite
Garner says we were ok first half but could've been better, started second half the better team and the sending off changed the game. Asked the ref if he was sure it was a penalty, ref said yes and at full time he's seen on replay that it was two yards outside the area.
Garner says we were ok first half but could've been better, started second half the better team and the sending off changed the game. Asked the ref if he was sure it was a penalty, ref said yes and he's seen on replay that it was two yards outside the area.
I don't think this is particularly wrong. We were on top in the second half with 11 men aside from when we played ourselves into trouble. I think maybe he could have made substitutions a tiny bit earlier, in hindsight, but you can't legislate for that
The non-penalty changed the game rather than the sending off.
At 0-0 we weren't chasing the game...
Yes we only had one shot all game, but its because the non-penalty gave Milton Keynes something to protect even more - If the game stays 0-0, then the dynamic of the game from that point forward goes differently.
e.g. there was about ten mins difference between Stockley who should have slid on to Kirk's cross and the penalty
But is wasn’t a pen. Even if it was it was clearly outside the box.
Yet again, the failure to buy a left back comes back to haunt us. Felt sorry for Clare. He’s decent at RB, bu is uncomfortable at LB. Had Kirk passed to either Stockley or the other player in the box we’d have gone one up, and the game would have changed 100%. Had a feeling that mistake would be pivotal, as they were proving very hard to break down.
I can’t work out why Stockley isn’t affecting games at all. Chuks did more in his 25 minutes than Stockley did in his 73. The only highlights were a couple of sublime bits of skill from Rak Sakyi, and that run by Aneke.
One shot on target from Rak. One miss from Payne. Can’t remember anything else.
That was absolute toilet. Never want to see Clare play LB ever again. Didn’t think it was a penalty but Inniss is a clown for getting himself in that situation in the first place. Stockley was anonymous, wingers were poor. Fraser for me the only bright spark . Some cameo from Morgan at the end too, played like a competition winner who was given five mins for his favourite club.
That was absolute toilet. Never want to see Clare play LB ever again. Didn’t think it was a penalty but Inniss is a clown for getting himself in that situation in the first place. Stockley was anonymous, wingers were poor. Fraser for me the only bright spark . Some cameo from Morgan at the end too, played like a competition winner who was given five mins for his favourite club.
Outpaced and leant into by the attacker who started to fall before they collided?
The Inniss foul is identical to the one committed by their player on Egbo seconds earlier, which was worse than the challenge Aneke gave away a penalty for against Exeter. Clearly outside the box. Joke of a referee. Worst part is he is out for the Ipswich match.
We didn't threaten enough though with 11 men but did feel without that sending off we would score. We started to threaten with Kirk out wide but we should have been putting them under loads more pressure with balls into the box and we didn't and when we did they were no where near anyone.
Clare really stuck out like a sore thumb. Not his fault but he really stunted our play down the left in the first half. Miserable night all in all.
I feared this result and MK Dons played as expected and there was no room in our final third. The only player who looked like he might do something was JRS who ran at them. We will be critical of our midfield but they had to produce inch perfect balls and the ball behind was not on. I think we could have gone three at the back before the sending off. In a game like that O'Connell and Inniss are just extra passes. Clare offensivley is a dead loss at left back as every ball he has to stop and cut in or pass back so he actually stifled moves playing in that position. CBT plays and it creates space as defenders have to stand off him.
We can argue the penalty wasn't a foul or at least in the area but MKDons deserved that result to be fair. I would have liked to see Aneke come on for the second half and play with Stockley. It shows a big thing holding us back that Garner can't do this. If I was advising Ipswich, I would say set up like MKDons, but they will probably be more open and try to beat us and we will have CBT back, hopefully, and start Sessengnon on the left so I think we have a decent chance.
I missed the Pompey game, but tonight came across as quite an arrogant performance. We’re not good enough to walk the ball into the net and it seemed like we’ve got 3 wins on the bounce and we can try and play like Man City.
It picked up over the last 3 games and the players and BG should take massive credit because we looked like we were teetering on going the other way, but that doesn’t give them the right to forget the basics. 60% possession is irrelevant.
I know Stockley is playing a lone role and has lost his partner in Leaburn, but 2 goals, 1 in open play in 15 games is not good enough.
And I don’t know how Aneke will be our ‘cheat code’. He looked absolutely knackered after coming on tonight and making a few runs. Albeit we were chasing the game with 10 men, but he literally chased the ball down 4 or 5 times and looked like he was going to collapse
Comments
Inniss is currently on 4 red cards in 45 games.
I said we are staying here
We are staying here
I said we are staying here!
At 0-0 we weren't chasing the game...
Yes we only had one shot all game, but its because the non-penalty gave Milton Keynes something to protect even more - If the game stays 0-0, then the dynamic of the game from that point forward goes differently.
e.g. there was about ten mins difference between Stockley who should have slid on to Kirk's cross and the penalty
So its not like we were living a charmed life.
He was shite bar one tackle.
Had Kirk passed to either Stockley or the other player in the box we’d have gone one up, and the game would have changed 100%. Had a feeling that mistake would be pivotal, as they were proving very hard to break down.
The only highlights were a couple of sublime bits of skill from Rak Sakyi, and that run by Aneke.
I would sub him every single time he gets booked, immediately after he's booked. He's either a bit dim or just incapable of playing safe.
An average of a red card every 11 games is embarrassing as a professional footballer.
No fit left back
Lack of strikers- - which includes injured & crap
No effective wingers. Too many with just 1 foot & then played on the wrong one.
Morgan & Macgrandells should be nowhere near the first team
Aneke should start. If he can't play 90 mins then pay up his contract & bring in a player who can play 40 odd games a season.
Mid table is ours for the taking.
We didn't threaten enough though with 11 men but did feel without that sending off we would score. We started to threaten with Kirk out wide but we should have been putting them under loads more pressure with balls into the box and we didn't and when we did they were no where near anyone.
Clare really stuck out like a sore thumb. Not his fault but he really stunted our play down the left in the first half. Miserable night all in all.
We can argue the penalty wasn't a foul or at least in the area but MKDons deserved that result to be fair. I would have liked to see Aneke come on for the second half and play with Stockley. It shows a big thing holding us back that Garner can't do this. If I was advising Ipswich, I would say set up like MKDons, but they will probably be more open and try to beat us and we will have CBT back, hopefully, and start Sessengnon on the left so I think we have a decent chance.
It picked up over the last 3 games and the players and BG should take massive credit because we looked like we were teetering on going the other way, but that doesn’t give them the right to forget the basics. 60% possession is irrelevant.
I know Stockley is playing a lone role and has lost his partner in Leaburn, but 2 goals, 1 in open play in 15 games is not good enough.
And I don’t know how Aneke will be our ‘cheat code’. He looked absolutely knackered after coming on tonight and making a few runs. Albeit we were chasing the game with 10 men, but he literally chased the ball down 4 or 5 times and looked like he was going to collapse