Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Charlton Summer Transfer Rumours 2024
Comments
-
A post not about Alfie May in what seems like 725 years000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?7 -
It took Robbo at least 3 seasons after signing to start showing signs of the player he became for us.golfaddick said:
Jonny Robinson came in the fill the very big boots of Robert Lee.thenewbie said:I would imagine that whatever the status of the May deal that it will be held off announcement as long as possible so that we have someone else to bring in almost straight away.
Probably very unfair on that player (whoever they are) as they will be associated with an unpopular decision and expected to match May's numbers, fairly or not, but May going and nothing about a replacement at all would be a PR nightmare for our "new" CEO...
Different type of player but he won over the fans.....and some.7 -
Birmingham, really? I grew up in coventry and was pleased to say i'd never been to birmingham until this current job, now 3 years ago. And I thought Cov was a shithole 😂0
-
Relegated clubs are nearly always favourites for promotion, unless they come down with points deductions and/or embargoes.NabySarr said:So 2 of the favourites for promotion are both in for him. Can I again ask why on earth we are letting him go?
Perhaps the question to ask is what the three clubs that want Alfie (Charlton, Birmingham and Huddersfield) have had in common in their ownerships the last few years.
Why are the well run clubs not in for him? Why is it the ones with money to spend but are yet to prove they can spend it wisely?1 -
Supposedly, it is because he was U24 at the time and a loan counts as helping with his development.Bailey said:
Remind me, how do we get a development fee for a player who was only ever on loan to us ?mart77 said:
The fee only came if he signed abroad.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?
Not something I was aware of but it came from a qualified football agent so inclined to believe.3 -
Im still waiting to hear how much money we were meant to get from Neymar’s transfer to PSG.Rothko said:
What crack have people been smoking to think that?000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?5 -
So if we were ‘well run’ like you say and didn’t sign him? We’d be preparing for a league 2 campaignCallumcafc said:
Relegated clubs are nearly always favourites for promotion, unless they come down with points deductions and/or embargoes.NabySarr said:So 2 of the favourites for promotion are both in for him. Can I again ask why on earth we are letting him go?
Perhaps the question to ask is what the three clubs that want Alfie (Charlton, Birmingham and Huddersfield) have had in common in their ownerships the last few years.
Why are the well run clubs not in for him? Why is it the ones with money to spend but are yet to prove they can spend it wisely?
Birmingham have shitloads of money so are probably just signing him because they can and it makes a statement
But for Huddersfield surely you can see it’s a smart signing that fits the system they are playing and the manager they have?I’m pretty confident whichever one he signs for will finish above us, and the other probably still will anyway4 -
It’s never a case of Alfie or nothing. Like some seem to think if he wasn’t around we’d have spent the season playing with 10 men…NabySarr said:
So if we were ‘well run’ like you say and didn’t sign him? We’d be preparing for a league 2 campaignCallumcafc said:
Relegated clubs are nearly always favourites for promotion, unless they come down with points deductions and/or embargoes.NabySarr said:So 2 of the favourites for promotion are both in for him. Can I again ask why on earth we are letting him go?
Perhaps the question to ask is what the three clubs that want Alfie (Charlton, Birmingham and Huddersfield) have had in common in their ownerships the last few years.
Why are the well run clubs not in for him? Why is it the ones with money to spend but are yet to prove they can spend it wisely?
Birmingham have shitloads of money so are probably just signing him because they can and it makes a statement
But for Huddersfield surely you can see it’s a smart signing that fits the system they are playing and the manager they have?I’m pretty confident whichever one he signs for will finish above us, and the other probably still will anyway
To answer the question… Depends how far you want to go back but if the club was well run, we’d have never resigned Chuks for a start. We’d have a proper target man that can stay fit, hold up the ball and keep the pressure off the defenders.
We would have prioritised bringing in better than resigning Hector and Thomas because they were just there and we’d already blown most of the budget on Alfie… etc etc
Mitchell and Edwards etc. are not sexy signings like a goalscorer is. But they’ll be just as impactful in terms of winning games.3 -
You genuinely don't know that. You HOPE that.Callumcafc said:
It’s never a case of Alfie or nothing. Like some seem to think if he wasn’t around we’d have spent the season playing with 10 men…NabySarr said:
So if we were ‘well run’ like you say and didn’t sign him? We’d be preparing for a league 2 campaignCallumcafc said:
Relegated clubs are nearly always favourites for promotion, unless they come down with points deductions and/or embargoes.NabySarr said:So 2 of the favourites for promotion are both in for him. Can I again ask why on earth we are letting him go?
Perhaps the question to ask is what the three clubs that want Alfie (Charlton, Birmingham and Huddersfield) have had in common in their ownerships the last few years.
Why are the well run clubs not in for him? Why is it the ones with money to spend but are yet to prove they can spend it wisely?
Birmingham have shitloads of money so are probably just signing him because they can and it makes a statement
But for Huddersfield surely you can see it’s a smart signing that fits the system they are playing and the manager they have?I’m pretty confident whichever one he signs for will finish above us, and the other probably still will anyway
To answer the question… Depends how far you want to go back but if the club was well run, we’d have never resigned Chuks for a start. We’d have a proper target man that can stay fit, hold up the ball and keep the pressure off the defenders.
We would have prioritised bringing in better than resigning Hector and Thomas because they were just there and we’d already blown most of the budget on Alfie… etc etc
Mitchell and Edwards etc. are not sexy signings like a goalscorer is. But they’ll be just as impactful in terms of winning games.
Alfie May guarantees goals and ergo.... points.2 -
Well precisely. That sounds good when he’s actually scoring.supaclive said:
You genuinely don't know that. You HOPE that.Callumcafc said:
It’s never a case of Alfie or nothing. Like some seem to think if he wasn’t around we’d have spent the season playing with 10 men…NabySarr said:
So if we were ‘well run’ like you say and didn’t sign him? We’d be preparing for a league 2 campaignCallumcafc said:
Relegated clubs are nearly always favourites for promotion, unless they come down with points deductions and/or embargoes.NabySarr said:So 2 of the favourites for promotion are both in for him. Can I again ask why on earth we are letting him go?
Perhaps the question to ask is what the three clubs that want Alfie (Charlton, Birmingham and Huddersfield) have had in common in their ownerships the last few years.
Why are the well run clubs not in for him? Why is it the ones with money to spend but are yet to prove they can spend it wisely?
Birmingham have shitloads of money so are probably just signing him because they can and it makes a statement
But for Huddersfield surely you can see it’s a smart signing that fits the system they are playing and the manager they have?I’m pretty confident whichever one he signs for will finish above us, and the other probably still will anyway
To answer the question… Depends how far you want to go back but if the club was well run, we’d have never resigned Chuks for a start. We’d have a proper target man that can stay fit, hold up the ball and keep the pressure off the defenders.
We would have prioritised bringing in better than resigning Hector and Thomas because they were just there and we’d already blown most of the budget on Alfie… etc etc
Mitchell and Edwards etc. are not sexy signings like a goalscorer is. But they’ll be just as impactful in terms of winning games.
Alfie May guarantees goals and ergo.... points.
Alfie May didn’t guarantee goals between December and February (1 goal in a 15 game stretch) and we didn’t pick up a win during that time. That’s the point, he goes off the boil and we’re in the shit.
Spread responsibility around the squad and insulate yourself from that happening again.7 -
Sponsored links:
-
Why don’t we spread responsibility around the squad and also keep the golden boot winner? They don’t have to be mutually exclusiveCallumcafc said:
Well precisely. That sounds good when he’s actually scoring.supaclive said:
You genuinely don't know that. You HOPE that.Callumcafc said:
It’s never a case of Alfie or nothing. Like some seem to think if he wasn’t around we’d have spent the season playing with 10 men…NabySarr said:
So if we were ‘well run’ like you say and didn’t sign him? We’d be preparing for a league 2 campaignCallumcafc said:
Relegated clubs are nearly always favourites for promotion, unless they come down with points deductions and/or embargoes.NabySarr said:So 2 of the favourites for promotion are both in for him. Can I again ask why on earth we are letting him go?
Perhaps the question to ask is what the three clubs that want Alfie (Charlton, Birmingham and Huddersfield) have had in common in their ownerships the last few years.
Why are the well run clubs not in for him? Why is it the ones with money to spend but are yet to prove they can spend it wisely?
Birmingham have shitloads of money so are probably just signing him because they can and it makes a statement
But for Huddersfield surely you can see it’s a smart signing that fits the system they are playing and the manager they have?I’m pretty confident whichever one he signs for will finish above us, and the other probably still will anyway
To answer the question… Depends how far you want to go back but if the club was well run, we’d have never resigned Chuks for a start. We’d have a proper target man that can stay fit, hold up the ball and keep the pressure off the defenders.
We would have prioritised bringing in better than resigning Hector and Thomas because they were just there and we’d already blown most of the budget on Alfie… etc etc
Mitchell and Edwards etc. are not sexy signings like a goalscorer is. But they’ll be just as impactful in terms of winning games.
Alfie May guarantees goals and ergo.... points.
Alfie May didn’t guarantee goals between December and February (1 goal in a 15 game stretch) and we didn’t pick up a win during that time. That’s the point, he goes off the boil and we’re in the shit.
Spread responsibility around the squad and insulate yourself from that happening again.
If you play May in his best position he will score goals. In that run, Appleton was being a complete idiot and playing him on the wing or up front on his own18 -
It’d be very nice to stop all this sniping amongst fans with the arrival of 5/6 starting 11 quality players, just so we could discuss something else for a while.7
-
75,000 poundsBailey said:In case I've missed it, what percentage do Cheltenham get in the transfer ?0 -
Henry Irving said:
Supposedly, it is because he was U24 at the time and a loan counts as helping with his development.Bailey said:
Remind me, how do we get a development fee for a player who was only ever on loan to us ?mart77 said:
The fee only came if he signed abroad.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?
Not something I was aware of but it came from a qualified football agent so inclined to believe.So should Gomez be sold abroad, would we get the Development Fee AS WELL AS the contracted add ons?1 -
Yes19addickted96 said:Henry Irving said:
Supposedly, it is because he was U24 at the time and a loan counts as helping with his development.Bailey said:
Remind me, how do we get a development fee for a player who was only ever on loan to us ?mart77 said:
The fee only came if he signed abroad.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?
Not something I was aware of but it came from a qualified football agent so inclined to believe.So should Gomez be sold abroad, would we get the Development Fee AS WELL AS the contracted add ons?0 -
How do you know that’s the case?Croydon said:
That's been Rich's line all along tbf, but doesn't sound like we've got any one lined up at as an advanced stage as bids being accepted.Scoham said:
Or move on to who our new strikers will be - one being a replacement and another as we needed one regardless of whether May was sold.Mendonca In Asdas said:The sun is shining, the birds are singing, rather than having zero rumours on here today, and 200 posts about Alfie May, can we not just close the thread for a day?
Cawley said we wanted signings sorted first so we should be close to at least one new striker.
Ahadme, Etete and Godden have been mentioned, any other realistic alternatives? I’m ignoring the strikers linked by nonsense Twitter accounts.
1 -
Re Maatsen his player passport will show all clubs he’s been with since he was 12 and all will get a slice as they played a part in his development. But only if he move overseas
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/solidarityFeeCalculator/index7 -
CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
8 -
Mart, I'm not saying you are wrong but I have never heard of that regulation and would be stunned if true.mart77 said:
It was some weird thing to do with how loan clubs play a part in the players development but apparently it is only if they go abroad when sold. Think it wasn’t a huge payment but suggested on here that it was over £100kBailey said:
Remind me, how do we get a development fee for a player who was only ever on loan to us ?mart77 said:
The fee only came if he signed abroad.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?0 -
You sound like me.PopIcon said:CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
However, for me it goes deeper. Its not just about losing our top goalscorer but it's the fact we still need to sign a number of players that can score from midfield as well as create a number of chances for others. Last season we had neither. I realise we signed Berry but we need more than just one new midfielder.
Until I see 3 or 4 of these I fear we are in for another disappointing season.8 -
Sponsored links:
-
All I can add is that it exists in Football Manager…1
-
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
Its not a fact is it, fact is Charlton got promoted in 85 without a 20+ striker, doesn't matter what Melrose did the season after.0 -
John Pearson scored 14 league goals in 1985/1986 and was Charlton’s top league goal scorerPopIcon said:CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.6 -
I sound like you, Golfie?golfaddick said:
You sound like me.PopIcon said:CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
However, for me it goes deeper. Its not just about losing our top goalscorer but it's the fact we still need to sign a number of players that can score from midfield as well as create a number of chances for others. Last season we had neither. I realise we signed Berry but we need more than just one new midfielder.
Until I see 3 or 4 of these I fear we are in for another disappointing season.
@AFKABartram please remove me from the forum with an immediate life ban.
19 -
It’s called a Solidarity Payment and it’s from FIFABailey said:
Mart, I'm not saying you are wrong but I have never heard of that regulation and would be stunned if true.mart77 said:
It was some weird thing to do with how loan clubs play a part in the players development but apparently it is only if they go abroad when sold. Think it wasn’t a huge payment but suggested on here that it was over £100kBailey said:
Remind me, how do we get a development fee for a player who was only ever on loan to us ?mart77 said:
The fee only came if he signed abroad.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Sorry if it’s been covered but Ian maatsen has been sold for 37 million, are we genuinely due money from that or is that speculation?
https://wdassocies.com/en/fifa-solidarity-contribution
but ot applicable if the player moves to a different country3 -
Nah...there's only one Golfie...🤦♂️PopIcon said:
I sound you, Golfie?golfaddick said:
You sound like me.PopIcon said:CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
However, for me it goes deeper. Its not just about losing our top goalscorer but it's the fact we still need to sign a number of players that can score from midfield as well as create a number of chances for others. Last season we had neither. I realise we signed Berry but we need more than just one new midfielder.
Until I see 3 or 4 of these I fear we are in for another disappointing season.
@AFKABartram please remove me from the forum with an immediate life ban.0 -
And in his own words there will be zero Golfie’s once Alfie is sold.eastterrace6168 said:
Nah...there's only one Golfie...🤦♂️PopIcon said:
I sound you, Golfie?golfaddick said:
You sound like me.PopIcon said:CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
However, for me it goes deeper. Its not just about losing our top goalscorer but it's the fact we still need to sign a number of players that can score from midfield as well as create a number of chances for others. Last season we had neither. I realise we signed Berry but we need more than just one new midfielder.
Until I see 3 or 4 of these I fear we are in for another disappointing season.
@AFKABartram please remove me from the forum with an immediate life ban.
So someone will need to fill the vacuum.
6 -
So, shall we take that as your application for the post of Golfie2FishCostaFortune said:
And in his own words there will be zero Golfie’s once Alfie is sold.eastterrace6168 said:
Nah...there's only one Golfie...🤦♂️PopIcon said:
I sound you, Golfie?golfaddick said:
You sound like me.PopIcon said:CoveredEndAndy said:
If you are using pro-rata to win your argument then Ahadma who we are rumoured to be after scored 11 in 19 games last season, so hes a perfect replacement for Alfie, he would of scored 26,PopIcon said:I posted this on the Alfie May thread yesterday, but i thought i'd share it again here.
Charlton don't do promotions without a goal scorer, it's a fact. To move May on without a proven goal scorer coming in lacks ambition and we are right to question Jones and the owners.
28/29 - Fred Whitlow 26
34/35 - Ralph Alan 33
35/36 - Harrold Hobbis 23
74/75 - Derek Hales 21
80/81 - Derek Hales 23
85/85 - Jimmy Melrose* (pro-rata) 20
97/98 - Clive Mendonca 28
99/00 - Andy Hunt 25
11/12 - Bradley Wright-Phillips 22
18/19 - Lyle Taylor 25
*Melrose's debut was on the 29th of March against Millwall in a 2-2 draw at the Draw
I'm not using pro-rata to win an argument, just facts.
Melrose scored 17 goals the following season for Charlton. In the league above and against much harder opposition. He was a proven goal scorer.
I'm telling you now, Charlton won't go up without a 20+ goal scorer.
However, for me it goes deeper. Its not just about losing our top goalscorer but it's the fact we still need to sign a number of players that can score from midfield as well as create a number of chances for others. Last season we had neither. I realise we signed Berry but we need more than just one new midfielder.
Until I see 3 or 4 of these I fear we are in for another disappointing season.
@AFKABartram please remove me from the forum with an immediate life ban.
So someone will need to fill the vacuum.1 -
You're Andy Scott aren't you?MuttleyCAFC said:If Birmingham are on the scene with May, surely it would be in our interests to tell them that we have agreed a fee with Huddersfield and to consider a fee from them it would have to be higher.0 -
I thought this was worth a good few LOL’s but didn’t get a single one……..Conway being The actual Bishop of Lincoln…..not the one who plays for Lincoln. Ya miserable bunch of bastards.SoundAsa£ said:Evidently we are considering making a move for Bishop of Lincoln….Stephen Conway.
Taxi for SoundAs.🙂9
This discussion has been closed.
