Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD ( +post p26): CAFC V Leyton Orient : Vertu Trophy RD 2 : Tues 10th Dec 2024 : KO 19:00

13233343638

Comments

  • Trying to analyse why we were so poor and I come back to the same conclusion I have all season. The midfield is so poor. They have been run around by teams all season. They seem incapable of passing to each other, moving forward as a unit and creating chances for the forwards. In recent games they also have been poor in protecting the back four. I assume Jones has recognised this, hence the long ball tactics to bypass midfield, but we are not even good at hoofball. This is the area where Jones needs needs to improve the team.
  • I’m not sure if they’ve downed tools but clearly Jones is not getting a tune out of them for some reason. There are decent players, certainly at this level, in there somewhere. For me the most shocking underperformer is Docherty. He was an integral part of Hull’s L1 winning team, played nearly 100 games in the Championship, goal of the season winner, a ‘fams favourite’ and always put in a decent shift when I’ve been to the MKM Stadium. He should be pulling up trees in L1 this season but it’s shocking to see how poor he’s been.
  • seth plum said:
    Nathan Jones was given a four year contract.

    What's your point, Seth?
    Jones was a high'ish profile manager, and as GC has previously stated, getting out of this pub league is a 3-5 year plan. It is highly unlikely that they could have got Jones with a shorter contract - and I'm assuming it's a 3.5 year deal rather than 4. I'm sure the SMT were not anticipating Jones would fail as badly as he has!

    The length of the contract has very likely no impact on the termination clause.
  • edited December 11
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    Nathan Jones was given a four year contract.

    What's your point, Seth?
    Jones was a high'ish profile manager, and as GC has previously stated, getting out of this pub league is a 3-5 year plan. It is highly unlikely that they could have got Jones with a shorter contract - and I'm assuming it's a 3.5 year deal rather than 4. I'm sure the SMT were not anticipating Jones would fail as badly as he has!

    The length of the contract has very likely no impact on the termination clause.
    My point is that as it stands we have three more years of this. Or two and a half.
    If there are affordable termination clauses for Jones, Ahadme, Docherty and Berry then I would favour termination rather than years more of this agony.
  • edited December 11
    seth plum said:
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    Nathan Jones was given a four year contract.

    What's your point, Seth?
    Jones was a high'ish profile manager, and as GC has previously stated, getting out of this pub league is a 3-5 year plan. It is highly unlikely that they could have got Jones with a shorter contract - and I'm assuming it's a 3.5 year deal rather than 4. I'm sure the SMT were not anticipating Jones would fail as badly as he has!

    The length of the contract has very likely no impact on the termination clause.
    My point is that as it stands we have three more years of this. Or two and a half.

    But we don't, do we? When has any manager failed so utterly and then seen out his long remaining contract?
  • bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    Nathan Jones was given a four year contract.

    What's your point, Seth?
    Jones was a high'ish profile manager, and as GC has previously stated, getting out of this pub league is a 3-5 year plan. It is highly unlikely that they could have got Jones with a shorter contract - and I'm assuming it's a 3.5 year deal rather than 4. I'm sure the SMT were not anticipating Jones would fail as badly as he has!

    The length of the contract has very likely no impact on the termination clause.
    My point is that as it stands we have three more years of this. Or two and a half.

    But we don't, do we? When has any manager failed so utterly and then seen out his long remaining contract?
    I wrote ‘as it stands’. If it is a simple process I would terminate the contract of Jones today.
  • Which is better, to head hunt a manager that someone with sway at the club fancies, or invite applications from someone who wants the job?
  • seth plum said:
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    Nathan Jones was given a four year contract.

    What's your point, Seth?
    Jones was a high'ish profile manager, and as GC has previously stated, getting out of this pub league is a 3-5 year plan. It is highly unlikely that they could have got Jones with a shorter contract - and I'm assuming it's a 3.5 year deal rather than 4. I'm sure the SMT were not anticipating Jones would fail as badly as he has!

    The length of the contract has very likely no impact on the termination clause.
    My point is that as it stands we have three more years of this. Or two and a half.

    But we don't, do we? When has any manager failed so utterly and then seen out his long remaining contract?
    I wrote ‘as it stands’. If it is a simple process I would terminate the contract of Jones today.

    It is a very simple process. Any and every contract can be terminated and the process for doing so will be written in the contract itself. Trust me, I know!
    If it was so difficult then why would the role of a professional football manager be one of, if not the, most insecure roles.
  • bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    Nathan Jones was given a four year contract.

    What's your point, Seth?
    Jones was a high'ish profile manager, and as GC has previously stated, getting out of this pub league is a 3-5 year plan. It is highly unlikely that they could have got Jones with a shorter contract - and I'm assuming it's a 3.5 year deal rather than 4. I'm sure the SMT were not anticipating Jones would fail as badly as he has!

    The length of the contract has very likely no impact on the termination clause.
    My point is that as it stands we have three more years of this. Or two and a half.

    But we don't, do we? When has any manager failed so utterly and then seen out his long remaining contract?
    I wrote ‘as it stands’. If it is a simple process I would terminate the contract of Jones today.

    It is a very simple process. Any and every contract can be terminated and the process for doing so will be written in the contract itself. Trust me, I know!
    If it was so difficult then why would the role of a professional football manager be one of, if not the, most insecure roles.
    Fair enough. Quite a number of our fans might think the cost of a simple termination of Jones’ contract might bankrupt the club.
    Let alone continuing to pay the wages of the dud players who we have brought in.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Stoke could have done us a favour last night and created a Bowyer situation. I felt a bit inevitable towards the end with Bowyer and him being able to resign and go to Birmingham spared there being any awkwardness with a sacking or too drawn out an exit. Wouldn't be the worst thing if Jones was able to do the same if things got toxic
  • follett said:
    When Leaburn first came back into the side he was challenging and winning headers, which used to be one of his biggest weaknesses prior to injury. He seems to have reverted back to half heartedly jumping with no desire to actually win the header and I don't think he won a single header last night.

    Even Godden was winning a fair few last night but as always with us, was flicking them on to nobody. 

    Every time we get the ball anywhere on the pitch we never have any options open to pass forward to, which inevitably results in passing it to the CB and lumping it. There's never anyone overlapping on the wing, so when we do get the ball there we don't progress it and never really whip any crosses in. We can't attack down the middle, we can't attack down the wing, it's no wonder we've mustered up 18 goals all season.

    I get that Jones' system is to press and win the ball high up and go from there but in the first half Orient gifted us the ball a few times in promising positions, just for us to kill the attack dead quicker than it began so even that doesn't seem an option
     
    Leaburn won 10 aerial duels out of 21 and Godden won 7 of 9 according to sofascore. That is an abysmal % by Leaburn
  • Once things start snowballing as our club it seems hard to stop. The majority of the fans seem to of made up their mind now and looking at some of these players they have too regardless of what they say in interviews. It's a shame, I really thought we'd landed a good one with Jones but his football is outdated (weirdly) he seems void of tactical nouse within games (how many times had he made a change in game that's won us a game) and he comes across ridiculously arrogant for someone that isn't performing as he should
  • I know people say we need a creative force, but (and I do hate think this analogy is overused but…), you could throw a KBD into our team and I don’t think it would change our style under Jones.

    He seems so focused on certain stats (he used to bang on about similar topics in his Southampton press conferences). And now it’s all about clean sheets. We couldn’t find KBD and if we did, there wouldn’t be the movement for him to create anything anyway. 

    Pretty much every game we play we look like a team trying to scrap our way out of relegation. Jokes talked about us being a front footed pressing team, but teams seem easily able to pass it around us - and then can simple press us into just punting it long. 

    We are not a counter attacking team as we can’t counter attack. We are not a turn over team as we just go backwards when we win a turnover most of the time - and we ain’t even a good long ball team as all our long balls are just big floating hoofs where we want to win the seconds but never can because our midfield are to busy sitting back to win them. 
  • Orient seem to be a decent, passing side, and were they near the top of the table last night's result would be a little more palatable. But they're not.
    The whole situation is very worrying, as the long term direction of the club appears to be downwards. Without drastic action, and soon, it's hard to know what can be done about it. Certainly a change in the management structure would be a start, as the recruitment has been a joke for years. 
    And Nathan doesn't seem to have what it takes to get this squad of players (a few of which are 'his' players) performing, sadly.
    I'm dreading Saturday now.
  • Anyone reading this , i could do with some anti ageing cream please for Christmas.
  • Sponsored links:


  • cafctom said:
    I’ve been coming for 32 years, in case anyone was wondering. 
    Nice one , enjoy it whilst it lasts,  just a warning, you may need tablets in a few years time!
  • fenaddick said:
    follett said:
    When Leaburn first came back into the side he was challenging and winning headers, which used to be one of his biggest weaknesses prior to injury. He seems to have reverted back to half heartedly jumping with no desire to actually win the header and I don't think he won a single header last night.

    Even Godden was winning a fair few last night but as always with us, was flicking them on to nobody. 

    Every time we get the ball anywhere on the pitch we never have any options open to pass forward to, which inevitably results in passing it to the CB and lumping it. There's never anyone overlapping on the wing, so when we do get the ball there we don't progress it and never really whip any crosses in. We can't attack down the middle, we can't attack down the wing, it's no wonder we've mustered up 18 goals all season.

    I get that Jones' system is to press and win the ball high up and go from there but in the first half Orient gifted us the ball a few times in promising positions, just for us to kill the attack dead quicker than it began so even that doesn't seem an option
     
    Leaburn won 10 aerial duels out of 21 and Godden won 7 of 9 according to sofascore. That is an abysmal % by Leaburn
    I have mentioned this before but without even checking the stats you will find that our most consistent players have been in the back four and up until Jones and Ramsay's injuries that was pretty much the pattern. Jones return on Saturday produced a better performance from Mitchell and a MOM in most quarters for Gillesphey. If you look elsewhere you will see that only Coventry is getting consistent high marks and is probably the only fixture in the midfield. Get to the forward line and bearing in mind we have at least six players to choose from, not including Tyreece Campbell who we were told was a forward, when we all believed he was a winger, and you find that none of the six have displayed great form or consistency, the nearest one to that would be Godden and I wouldn't say he looks a threat, Ahadme, Leaburn, Kanu have all been, at the very best inconsistent, it doesn't matter if we play two up or three, we don't create chances from open play and that is down to the tactics of defence first employed by Nathan Jones. Leaburn's body language looks to me like it's borne out of frustration and if some people are right then Godden is starting to go the same way. Jones is killing our forwards with this style of play and those forwards know it. 
  • Orient should have that game done and dusted long before they got their first goal last night. Unbelievable amount of chances they missed and bar the Godden shot that hit the post and the effort from Leaburn in the second we hardly threatened 

    The squad is not good enough at this level and those brought in last night (Bar Potts and Young Josh) can’t have any complaints if they are not starting this Saturday 

    Two out of form sides head into the Valley this weekend now. Jones in my opinion has 2 games left 
  • No matter who we play the Manager sets us up like we are the underdog, front footed my arse ! he brought Dixon into the starting line up ( who I like most dont doubt that he isnt ready but wanted to see him given the chance ) and then had him playing on the right in his own half most of the time, I cant remember one time when he pushed high up the pitch where his pace and trickery might have been utilised.

    Enough is enough we are going nowhere with this guy, he even has the cheek to blame the squad he inherited ? I would say that the biggest under performers this season have been his signings, anyone that can tell me how the fuck Doc, Berry and AC got promoted to the Premership would be really appreciated as all 3 have looked like NL players all season
  • Anyone reading this , i could do with some anti ageing cream please for Christmas.
    Stop watching Charlton, you will be surprised how young you will look after a  few months 😂
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!