Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

General things that Annoy you

11721731751771781005

Comments

  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,413

    Anyone over the age of 16 playing games consoles.

    Don't give me that. Lads across the country going through university playing fifa drinking games is part of British culture.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,993

    areas of ground that stay wet and muddy even in drought.

    fell onto my arse on one such area on hampstead heath today, bloody annoying!

    People scrambling around Hampstead Heath :smile:
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,977
    #Lads
  • PeterGage
    PeterGage Posts: 1,793
    Riviera said:

    people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead

    This.
    Apart from anything else it's illegal.
    Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanks
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,977
    People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.
  • People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.

    Yeah it is super annoying when people do that
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,022
    Big football fans, as in "he's a big fan of xxxxx". This description even gets used for people who've never seen their team play. Is nobody just a normal fan anymore?
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    edited April 2015
    rina said:

    americans spelling laser as lazer. it's an acronym ffs, you can't just change one of the letters

    Hey buddy,

    Light amplification (by) Zoom emission (of) radiation.

    :wink: Stop shining that in my eye, you Mother......

  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,413
    light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167
    PeterGage said:

    Riviera said:

    people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead

    This.
    Apart from anything else it's illegal.
    Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanks
    It's part of the Dangerous Dogs Act.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    Riviera said:

    PeterGage said:

    Riviera said:

    people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead

    This.
    Apart from anything else it's illegal.
    Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanks
    It's part of the Dangerous Dogs Act.
    100% wrong...dogs must be under control, no mention of must be on a lead.

    Do dogs have to be kept on a lead on a public right of way?
    The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 s1(2)(c) makes it an offence for a dog to be at large (that is to say not on a lead or otherwise under close control) in a field or enclosure in which there are sheep but under close control is not defined.

    It is possible for the local highway authority to make an order under Section 27 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 requiring dogs to be kept on leads on specific public rights of way, although these require approval of the police and are rarely used.
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,220

    People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.

    This has been annoying me for about the last two years.

    "I've been super busy", "it was super fun"... do shut up indeed!


  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    Curb_It said:

    People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.

    This has been annoying me for about the last two years.

    "I've been super busy", "it was super fun"... do shut up indeed!


    Super:
    It just too Twee for us Cafc fans.
    I must dash, i off to the Super Market.

  • NomadicAddick
    NomadicAddick Posts: 2,114

    Anyone over the age of 16 playing games consoles.

    No way. I'll be playing FIFA until I'm 30 then i'll re-evaluate what I do with my spare time.
  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,164
    Stig said:

    areas of ground that stay wet and muddy even in drought.

    fell onto my arse on one such area on hampstead heath today, bloody annoying!

    Going dogging out on The Heath and the best offer you get is from a bloke with a muddy arse.
    well you're not entirely wide of the mark but the dogging you refer to was my own border collie%(<<
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167
    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    edited April 2015
    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    you cant just stick these up outside your pub and pretend its the law..... :smile:
  • Bryan_Kynsie
    Bryan_Kynsie Posts: 2,179
    maximum 4 dogs per walker? What's the point of that when the walker has to keep them all on leads and clear up after them?
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    edited April 2015
    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.
    If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
  • Bryan_Kynsie
    Bryan_Kynsie Posts: 2,179
    Greenie said:

    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.
    If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
    Surely it will still be dogshit unless you are taking a bull for a walk?
  • Sponsored links:



  • mistrollingin
    mistrollingin Posts: 3,868
    A recent thing that has crept into the language...........you ask somebody a question and they prefix their answer with the word "so".

    Very annoying.
  • AddickUpNorth
    AddickUpNorth Posts: 8,325

    Anyone over the age of 16 playing games consoles.


    42 and still enjoy a blast on the ol' Xbox now and again. Spent far too much time in arcades when I was a yoot and it has never fully left my system.
  • People not putting a lead on bulls that shit on foot paths
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,825

    People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.

    I hate these people @ValleyGary because:

    1: they always seem so BLOODY HAPPY. Them with their never ending supply of energy and positive demeanour

    2. They are the same aholes that don't just have a pint or Chinese, they have a cheeky pint or a cheeky chinese.

    Pathetic happy twats
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,022

    Stig said:

    areas of ground that stay wet and muddy even in drought.

    fell onto my arse on one such area on hampstead heath today, bloody annoying!

    Going dogging out on The Heath and the best offer you get is from a bloke with a muddy arse.
    well you're not entirely wide of the mark but the dogging you refer to was my own border collie%(
    Keith Lard? :wink:
  • rikofold
    rikofold Posts: 4,051
    Greenie said:

    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.
    If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
    The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.
  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,418
    rikofold said:

    Greenie said:

    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.
    If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
    The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.


    "A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.

    It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."
  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,418
    edited April 2015
    T.C.E said:

    rikofold said:

    Greenie said:

    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.
    If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
    The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.


    "A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.

    It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."
    Lifted from a website.
  • charltonkeston
    charltonkeston Posts: 7,359
    rikofold said:

    Greenie said:

    Riviera said:

    Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.

    I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.
    If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
    The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.
    Is this really a problem? I don't see any dog walkers in the roads around my way with dogs off their leads.
    As long as dog owner clear up after their animals I don't have a problem dogs.

    But I do have a problem with the police and their horses crapping up Floyd Road, You see the steaming piles and rivers of pee on the way to the ground but on the home its a bit of a lottery what one you step in.
    You always walk on the pavement but thats always got dog shit dotted about it.
  • rina
    rina Posts: 2,334
    I've had way more problems with dogs on extendible leads than those without leads
This discussion has been closed.