Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
General things that Annoy you
Comments
-
Don't give me that. Lads across the country going through university playing fifa drinking games is part of British culture.ValleyGary said:Anyone over the age of 16 playing games consoles.
5 -
People scrambling around Hampstead Heathsillav nitram said:areas of ground that stay wet and muddy even in drought.
fell onto my arse on one such area on hampstead heath today, bloody annoying!
0 -
#Lads0
-
Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanksRiviera said:
This.NomadicAddick said:people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead
Apart from anything else it's illegal.0 -
People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.3
-
Yeah it is super annoying when people do thatValleyGary said:People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.
3 -
Big football fans, as in "he's a big fan of xxxxx". This description even gets used for people who've never seen their team play. Is nobody just a normal fan anymore?2
-
Hey buddy,rina said:americans spelling laser as lazer. it's an acronym ffs, you can't just change one of the letters
Light amplification (by) Zoom emission (of) radiation.
Stop shining that in my eye, you Mother......
1 -
light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation1
-
It's part of the Dangerous Dogs Act.PeterGage said:
Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanksRiviera said:
This.NomadicAddick said:people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead
Apart from anything else it's illegal.0 - Sponsored links:
-
100% wrong...dogs must be under control, no mention of must be on a lead.Riviera said:
It's part of the Dangerous Dogs Act.PeterGage said:
Is it illegal? Please point me in the direction of the relevant Act of Parliament, thanksRiviera said:
This.NomadicAddick said:people who walk their dogs round the streets without a lead
Apart from anything else it's illegal.
Do dogs have to be kept on a lead on a public right of way?
The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 s1(2)(c) makes it an offence for a dog to be at large (that is to say not on a lead or otherwise under close control) in a field or enclosure in which there are sheep but under close control is not defined.
It is possible for the local highway authority to make an order under Section 27 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 requiring dogs to be kept on leads on specific public rights of way, although these require approval of the police and are rarely used.0 -
This has been annoying me for about the last two years.ValleyGary said:People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.
"I've been super busy", "it was super fun"... do shut up indeed!
0 -
Super:Curb_It said:
This has been annoying me for about the last two years.ValleyGary said:People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.
"I've been super busy", "it was super fun"... do shut up indeed!
It just too Twee for us Cafc fans.
I must dash, i off to theSuperMarket.
0 -
No way. I'll be playing FIFA until I'm 30 then i'll re-evaluate what I do with my spare time.ValleyGary said:Anyone over the age of 16 playing games consoles.
0 -
well you're not entirely wide of the mark but the dogging you refer to was my own border collie%(<<Stig said:
Going dogging out on The Heath and the best offer you get is from a bloke with a muddy arse.sillav nitram said:areas of ground that stay wet and muddy even in drought.
fell onto my arse on one such area on hampstead heath today, bloody annoying!
1 -
you cant just stick these up outside your pub and pretend its the law.....Riviera said:Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
5 -
maximum 4 dogs per walker? What's the point of that when the walker has to keep them all on leads and clear up after them?0
-
Surely it will still be dogshit unless you are taking a bull for a walk?Greenie said:
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.Riviera said:Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.4 - Sponsored links:
-
A recent thing that has crept into the language...........you ask somebody a question and they prefix their answer with the word "so".
Very annoying.4 -
ValleyGary said:
Anyone over the age of 16 playing games consoles.
42 and still enjoy a blast on the ol' Xbox now and again. Spent far too much time in arcades when I was a yoot and it has never fully left my system.0 -
People not putting a lead on bulls that shit on foot paths1
-
I hate these people @ValleyGary because:ValleyGary said:People that put the word 'super' in front of other words..... 'oh thats super cool'....shut up.
1: they always seem so BLOODY HAPPY. Them with their never ending supply of energy and positive demeanour
2. They are the same aholes that don't just have a pint or Chinese, they have a cheeky pint or a cheeky chinese.
Pathetic happy twats
8 -
Keith Lard?sillav nitram said:
well you're not entirely wide of the mark but the dogging you refer to was my own border collie%(Stig said:
Going dogging out on The Heath and the best offer you get is from a bloke with a muddy arse.sillav nitram said:areas of ground that stay wet and muddy even in drought.
fell onto my arse on one such area on hampstead heath today, bloody annoying! 0 -
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.Greenie said:
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.Riviera said:Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.0 -
rikofold said:
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.Greenie said:
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.Riviera said:Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
"A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.
It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."0 -
Lifted from a website.T.C.E said:rikofold said:
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.Greenie said:
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.Riviera said:Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
"A dog is considered ‘under control’ if it is on a lead held by someone able to control the dog. For example, a large dog would not be under control if its lead was held by a child who would be unable to restrain the dog if it strained against the lead.
It isn't necessary for dogs to be leashed at all times. However, dogs must be kept on a lead in designated pedestrian zones and on land where livestock is present. Councils have bye-laws to indicate areas where leashing is required, such as in public parks."
0 -
Is this really a problem? I don't see any dog walkers in the roads around my way with dogs off their leads.rikofold said:
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act gives councils the right to do pretty much what they want re creating mad bye-laws so they can get the revenue from on the spot fines. Dogs on leads is one example of this, and it's no surprise Greenwich are ahead of the game as they must be running out of ideas to screw motorists by now.Greenie said:
I don't really care either way, but if you google the laws on dog on leads you find what I posted earlier.Riviera said:Dogs on leads at all times. £1000 fine. By order of Greenwich Council.
If you state that its in the dangerous dogs act then its bullshit.
As long as dog owner clear up after their animals I don't have a problem dogs.
But I do have a problem with the police and their horses crapping up Floyd Road, You see the steaming piles and rivers of pee on the way to the ground but on the home its a bit of a lottery what one you step in.
You always walk on the pavement but thats always got dog shit dotted about it.
1 -
I've had way more problems with dogs on extendible leads than those without leads1
This discussion has been closed.
