Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kent CCC 2015

1…4849515354…59

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,854
    Now overcast with spots of rain, not nice batting conditions
  • ken_shabby
    ken_shabby Posts: 6,256
    22-2 Hells bells. Crap openers.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,854
    Denly out, then we go off for rain the next ball, Humph
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Does 7.4 overs constitute a game ?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,854
    The rain is stopping anyway. Nice rainbow...
  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    New target: 229 off 32.2 overs. New cut off time: 10:15.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Start?
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Kent 36-3 off 11
  • boogica
    boogica Posts: 2,321
    We are bang In trouble
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    boogica said:

    We are bang In trouble

    I think you are.
    Would hate to think what D/L is now.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    The_President said:

    Start?

    Started at 8. But Cowdrey is now out, clean bowled by Tom Curran. 42-3, another 209 needed off 28.3. The Sams are together.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,854
    Northeast out. We're doomed. The Currans have all the wickets
  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    Oh Dear. North by NorthEast clean bowled by Tom Curran. 49-4. These Curran brothers look good.
  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    And now Bilings stumped by Foakes for just 3. 49-5.
    Adams out!
  • boogica
    boogica Posts: 2,321
    We are in trouble pile of shite .
  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    WASP says 1%.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Kent need 184 off 23
    67-5
  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    FFS. Monster 6 by Stevens to get us over 100, Tredwell out next ball! 101-7.
    Did I say "Adams Out"?
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,934
    edited August 2015
    I posted on the Surrey thread but ill repeat it on here. When will Darren Stevens retire?? He always does well against us!!

    Luckily this time it won't make a difference!
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    cantersaddick said:

    I posted on the Surrey thread but ill repeat it on here. When will Darren Stevens retire?? He always does well against us!!

    Luckily this time it won't make a difference!

    Dont gloat Canters - Stevens just out !
  • Sponsored links:



  • Peter_G
    Peter_G Posts: 839
    Stevo just gone. Feathered one behind to Foakes. And Kent are well and truly Foaked. Apart from Stevens, this has been a lame response by the Spitfires.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,934
    Well that'll teach me for thinking it was all over when Stevens got out! Coles is having a whale of a time!!
  • AlF
    AlF Posts: 75
    I can't believe what I'm seeing.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,770
    edited August 2015
    Coles out for exactly 100. Kent have lost. Surrey win by 17 runs.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    superb innings - nearly did the impossible for Kent.
    out of partnership of 64, Hunn scored 1 run and faced 5 balls.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,770
    All of their bowlers went at over 7 runs per over with the exception of these Curran fellas.

    SM Curran 8-3-34-2 (4.25 rpo)
    TK Curran 7.4-0-22-3 (2.86 rpo)
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,934
    What an unbelievable innings great coles! I dont even have it in me to gloat after that!! Phew!!
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,770
    edited August 2015
    Can't believe that...

    From 101-7 to 233 in 17.3 overs.

    We needed 18 runs from 15 balls at the time they got the final wicket.


    We ALMOST dug ourselves out of a massive hole but much like the T20 quarter final, we left ourselves too much to do *again*.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,770
    edited August 2015
    And I'm not a fan of D/L either!!

    How does 273 in the first innings equate to a target of 252 from 40???? Effectively shaving 60 balls from our innings but only 21 runs from the target.
  • 1StevieG
    1StevieG Posts: 10,964
    Callumcafc said:

    And I'm not a fan of D/L either!!

    How does 273 in the first innings equate to a target of 252 from 40???? Effectively shaving 60 balls from our innings but only 21 runs from the target.

    Loss of 2 wickets before DL.

Categories

“Marketplace”