Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?
EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
It's legally nothing to do with football ffs.
Disagree. ESI 1 can argue that delay diminishes the asset because of the imminent start of the season and potentially removes the chance of a sale. Therefore an interim injunction should not be awarded.
But that could be settle with damages at a later point.
My point was it doesn't matter legally, if its a football club, a house or a sweet shop. It's either been sold, has a contract of exclusiveity or it hasn't.
That's not what this hearing is about (at least I don't think it is). Breach of contract is normally remedied by damages. ESI 2 have to show that is not an adequate remedy should they be right about the contract and that an injunction is therefore necessary.
This entire case is to decide who gets TS's money. Makes me sick.
Maybe this is why Thomas is in town, because he thinks that either way, he can still buy the club, this hearing only decides where the money goes perhaps?
No, this hearing is to decide whether or not there should be another hearing to decide where the money goes. That hearing might not happen until November, by which time TS might have come to his senses!
I don't know what some of you were expecting. That Elliott's lawyer would just stumble over his words and hold up blank pieces of paper? That he'd be a face taped onto a mop? It doesn't matter what this guy says, if our lawyer can show that the deal was never agreed, with evidence, then hopefully that's what the judge will focus on.
Jesus don't know why I bother with Twitter. Everyone on there is already acting like the club is gone....... A lot of people don't seem to realize that both sides get to speak in a situation like this
Jesus don't know why I bother with Twitter. Everyone on there is already acting like the club is gone....... A lot of people don't seem to realize that both sides get to speak in a situation like this
Jesus don't know why I bother with Twitter. Everyone on there is already acting like the club is gone....... A lot of people don't seem to realize that both sides get to speak in a situation like this
You've seen reactions though when we're losing in actual games though... This is going to be even worse!!
Chaisty turning to "adequacy of damages" - damages would not be adequate.
"We will not have the share. It would make it a complete nonsense to have a trial when the shares have already gone."
Don't understand this unless he is saying that damages not adequate remedy because no way of securing payment against a shell company.
You got it. That was the point he was making. What was unsaid of course was that Elliott would like to make a profit on selling on to TS rather than Nimer doing that.
I don't know what some of you were expecting. That Elliott's lawyer would just stumble over his words and hold up blank pieces of paper? That he'd be a face taped onto a mop? It doesn't matter what this guy says, if our lawyer can show that the deal was never agreed, with evidence, then hopefully that's what the judge will focus on.
Let's hope so. We have been told by ESI 1 that they have a very strong position. Now is the time to see it.
Chaisty is really stringing out his hourly rate here. References to how many are on line, what a bore. Just give the facts in short, sharp, summary. He doth protest too much me thinks.
Comments
Rather than copying a tweet that some may not be able to read
To have to listen to this kind of shit for hours and hours day after day is more painful than root canal surgery!
hopefully...………………..eventually...…………….