Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Part of me says we're fucked and TS will walk away if this drags on until November.
Another part says TS will just say right i'll pay both ESI 1 and 2, a couple of million each to fuck off.
3 -
Atletico Addick said:Their lawyer banging on about evidence and lack of yet I've not heard an iota from himself, all hearsay and spiel. All a huge shame this. Kreamer very respectable but we've been cornered by corruptness. Super upsetting and the ripple effect will be huge sadly.0
-
Judge again saying that he doesn't see staging a trial in October as being realistic.0
-
Dippenhall said:Even the opposition saying we played a crap game.7
-
Chris_from_Sidcup said:Part of me says we're fucked and TS will walk away if this drags on until November.
Another part says TS will just say right i'll pay both ESI 1 and 2, a couple of million each to fuck off.
0 -
Chaisty saying Elliott "not turning a blind eye" to ways to assist everyone - including the club. He says interim order protects him being part of the procedure.0
-
Redrobo said:Will the offer to pay Elliott his money back plus fifty grand get mentioned and turn the tide?1
-
Why is the other bloke talking again to refute LK’s evidence? Is she going to do the same?0
-
KentishAddick said:Dippenhall said:Even the opposition saying we played a crap game.0
-
The judge can only go on what's been submitted. No evidence of Sandgaard's interaction with the EFL etc was submitted and "internet rumours" is not enough to go off of. That's my understanding.3
- Sponsored links:
-
Nonce?2
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Is LK getting another crack aswell?0
-
Yes Jimmy Hart, yes you are a nonce.2
-
Another idiot saying something. Called the judge a nonce it seems3
-
Whoever Jimmy Hart is needs to fuck off6
-
These grown men chiming in are embarassing12
-
Judgement icoming0
-
ross1 said:Judge again saying that he doesn't see staging a trial in October as being realistic.0
-
Chunes said:These grown men chiming in are embarassing1
-
Jimmy H says ‘nonce’. Not sure how helpful that is.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Why they not mute everyone1
-
We’re Fooked0
-
No.1 in South London said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:Is LK getting another crack aswell?0
-
Maybe Thomas can talk to ESI 2, offer them the same deal as ESI 1 and money could be paid into a neutral account until they legally settle with each other. This could be attractive for ESI2 as they do have difficulties like EFL appeal going against them. Then maybe a complex legal sale could be made.1
-
Judge Richard Pearce about to pass judgement, which will take about 30 minutes.0
-
30mins to pass judgment apparently0
-
ross1 said:Chaisty says if there is no evidence of any imminent sale, "where is the risk in a temporary injunction?"0
-
Way to get the Beak onside.
Slow hand clap.6 -
MuttleyCAFC said:Maybe Thomas can talk to ESI 2, offer them the same deal as ESI 1 and money could be paid into a neutral account until they legally settle with each other. This could be attractive for ESI2 as they do have difficulties like EFL appeal going against them. Then maybe a complex legal sale could be made.0
This discussion has been closed.