Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Was that picture actually taken yesterday?ButtleJR said:Now Chaisty is referring to LK's post wearing a Charlton scarf...0 -
Any wory that this will have any bearing on today's outcome, or is it just sour grapes?0
-
Sounds like a bitter loss for our friend Chaisty. Nothing to do with this case, clutching at straws.4
-
Chaisty bringing up fact that the press were reporting last night that a deal with Sandgaard is just a matter of days away.
He's always brought up Kreamer's tweet last night.
It was surprising to see what we saw last night. But maybe I'm a different generation."
0 -
I think Chaisty could persuade the judge to let them appeal (if they want to)MattF said:Any wory that this will have any bearing on today's outcome, or is it just sour grapes?0 -
What a massive cry baby.I don’t condone people making threats but he’s an intelligent bloke so probably best not to take a high profile case, in which thousands of passionate fans are rightly disgruntled at your client, if you’re going to get all upset about the fallout.2
-
Judge Richard Pearce says it is completely unacceptable that those listening in to hearing should subject applicants to abuse and that is a matter which in certain circumstances the court can take action.
Completely understandable to be honest!!20 -
Judge has referred to above incidents as "completely unacceptable", says court can take action on these threats. However has stated without any previous warning of these repercussions that it could be difficult. However, seems willing to consider taking action.0
-
Pearce saying it isn't a matter he can treat as a contempt - even though can exercise those powers - because there hadn't been a warning.
But he'll obtain information and consider that matter.
5 - Sponsored links:
-
Just sounds like point scoring and sour grapes. Totally irrelevant to the day's proceedings.1
-
Trouble is the court case yesterday had nothing to do with Charlton Athletic surely?ButtleJR said:Now Chaisty is referring to LK's post wearing a Charlton scarf...
It was primarily between Lex and Panorama2 -
what is wrong with some people. He was just doing his job. If you want to vent your spleen there are plenty of other much more worthy candidates. Some people need to grow up.ButtleJR said:
Says some emails justified being reported to the police.ButtleJR said:Chaisty starting off referring to hostile emails he received after yesterday's hearing.6 -
He can't be happy being outsmarted by a junior Barrister.
Suspect its sour grapes.
Given all of Farnell's conflicts of interest his comments are laughable.8 -
On Kreamer's previous relationship with CAST, he says it comes "as a complete surprise". "I'm not sure that is a matter for me. I'm not expressing any view at the moment whether Ms Kreamer has or hasn't acted inappropriately."
0 -
LK has started off by saying that this point is not relevant and she doesn't need to comment. Judge agrees.33
-
Judge says he surprised that she is a fan, but it isnt down to him whether to take action on LK having a conflict of interest... but he will speak to her privately.
0 -
Fecking old cnut , more like.ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty bringing up fact that the press were reporting last night that a deal with Sandgaard is just a matter of days away.
He's always brought up Kreamer's tweet last night.
It was surprising to see what we saw last night. But maybe I'm a different generation."2 -
So it wasn't enough that she resigned from CAST soley so that she could represent Panorama yesterday0
-
LK says she isnt going to waste judges time discussing it
9 - Sponsored links:
-
Kreamer says she is surprised point about her has been raised but won’t waste the court’s time on it.
7 -
Chaisty now referring to an appeal.0
-
Sounds like the Judge did know (hence the way she defended us), probably just doesnt care and is being tactful towards Chaisty1
-
What a fucking bellend😂0
-
Lex Dominus preparing an expedited appeal, whether given permission by the court or not.
Not really much back from Kreamer. Chaisty now on to trial process, submission of an appeal and some relief pending an appeal - whether the judge grants one or not.
0 -
Chaisty saying they are preparing an apeal
0 -
Complaining about Kreamer proves that old law adage:
If you get into trouble, don't play the case. Play the man
sign of a weak case imo and clutching at straws13 -
Well thats no surprise, Elliott said they'd be appealing the hell out of any decision that wasnt in their favour0
-
Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Nice to see the judge using last nights news to effectively back up his decision not to award the injunction3 -
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?1
This discussion has been closed.
