Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Chaisty saying Panorama is a shell company and will have no interest in the case. But he's still asking for a speedy trial in case their pessimism is misplaced or some form of relief from the court of appeal which still makes a trial effective.
0 -
.0
-
Does this mean they club can't be sold until an appeal is heard?0
-
This is looking a bit more interesting than I had thought.
Attacking fans for abuse (with some justification), attacking LK, wants an appeal and fast trial. Suddenly the prospect of a sale is imminent according to Chaisty following media reports. Yesterday he said that was all just gossip.
3 -
Someone just seemed to unmute their mic and let out a cackle while Chaisty was talking.2
-
Twat made the opposite argument yesterday, saying there would be no problem in granting the injunction as the trial would happen before any likely saleForeverAddickted said:Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.8 -
I suspect it's come into the public demain over night. So is relevant to an appeal?Leeds_Addick said:
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?0 -
For a solicitor, Chaisty states an awful lot of conjuncture trying to dress it as factual. Easy to take sides in this case but I think he certainly needs a lot more substance if he were to impress me. Obvious mind games at the start in trying to scare Kreamer a little.0
-
Nope sounds like the Judge is saying that a appeal wont be allowed as looks likely the club will be sold before NovemberChunes said:Does this mean they club can't be sold until an appeal is heard?3 -
Do deals with snakes, prepare to get bitten.ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Nice to see the judge using last nights news to effectively back up his decision not to award the injunction5 - Sponsored links:
-
Hopefully heard in November, he seemed happy with that yesterday.ForeverAddickted said:Well thats no surprise, Elliott said they'd be appealing the hell out of any decision that wasnt in their favour
Was he not busy for several weeks!0 -
1. I don't understand how he's able to bring new evidence into this.dickad1 said:This is looking a bit more interesting than I had thought.
Attacking fans for abuse (with some justification), attacking LK, wants an appeal and fast trial. Suddenly the prospect of a sale is imminent according to Chaisty following media reports. Yesterday he said that was all just gossip.
2. This was the reason the injunction was refused0 -
There is no issue in being a fan of a football club and also representing it - she stepped down from CAST to sever any link whilst she acted on the case - end of10
-
They don't like it up um !ForeverAddickted said:
Nope sounds like the Judge is saying that a appeal wont be allowed as looks likely the club will be sold before NovemberChunes said:Does this mean they club can't be sold until an appeal is heard?1 -
LK was bringing stuff up that was in the public doman yesterday and Chaisty made a fuss about it and she had to stopCafc43v3r said:
I suspect it's come into the public demain over night. So is relevant to an appeal?Leeds_Addick said:
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?1 -
Chaisty saying the trial will take 4-5 days. - Judge Pearce now bringing up the subject of transferring the case to London.
Kreamer wants "speedy resolution" but takes exception to Chaisty saying about Panorama disappearing. Doesn't want that factored into judge's thinking.
1 -
F**k knows what they're on about now tbh0
-
Didn't see his face but if Tom from Eltham is reading I'd happily go to Court to say it was him who turned on his mic and shouted "That's because you're a c*** Farnell".PragueAddick said:Just re-posting from the other thread. @Rob7Lee has said that "John Burke" was added, early on to the list of attendees, presumably by Elliott's crew. Did anyone else notice this? If so, did they see the person on screen? We are very anxious to ID him.2 -
The judge isn't an idiot. The imminent sale isn't going to effect things, purely on the basis it was the main reason the injunction wasn't granted yesterday.3
-
Is this basically what we wanted? - the trial becomes between Lex and PanoramaButtleJR said:F**k knows what they're on about now tbh
In the meantime Charlton can be sold as there is no injunction9 - Sponsored links:
-
There are probably different rules of evidence between yesterday and today tbf1
-
No different to representing yourself IMHOLordflashheart said:There is no issue in being a fan of a football club and also representing it - she stepped down from CAST to sever any link whilst she acted on the case - end of2 -
You're probably right. Just seems odd. Hopefully this new evidence actually goes in our favour.Chunes said:There are probably different rules of evidence between yesterday and today tbf0 -
What about the damages0
-
You would argue that that could have been submitted as part of the evidence, but as it wasn't tough.Leeds_Addick said:
LK was bringing stuff up that was in the public doman yesterday and Chaisty made a fuss about it and she had to stopCafc43v3r said:
I suspect it's come into the public demain over night. So is relevant to an appeal?Leeds_Addick said:
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?ForeverAddickted said:Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November. He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?
You can't include something that had not happened yet as evidence. But it could influence an appeal.0 -
So yesterday Chaisty wants an injunction cause there's no evidence of an imminent sale, judge says no because it might put off any potential sale, now Chaisty says there is evidence of imminent sale so we want the appeal, this law stuff is bonkers14
-
Kreamer wants trial transferred to London. Says suggestion it doesn’t matter as hearing is remote not an adequate reason for case to commence in Manchester. Respondent in London so proceedings should have been issued there. Should be transferred.
Kreamer applying for transfer of the case to the High Court in London.
2 -
I couldn't care less what happens between Lex and Panorama provided we've already been sold, both sides are dodgy!ForeverAddickted said:
Is this basically what we wanted? - the trial becomes between Lex and PanoramaButtleJR said:F**k knows what they're on about now tbh
In the meantime Charlton can be sold as there is no injunction11 -
7
-
Is this our go at stringing this outForeverAddickted said:Kreamer wants trial transferred to London. Says suggestion it doesn’t matter as hearing is remote not an adequate reason for case to commence in Manchester. Respondent in London so proceedings should have been issued there. Should be transferred.
Kreamer applying for transfer of the case to the High Court in London.0
This discussion has been closed.
