Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)
Comments
-
If I wanted to watch a rock show I would go buy a ticket to see the Rolling Stones. I bought a season ticket at the Valley to watch football.MickeyBennett said:
My sources tell me Sandgaard has something very special in store for us next week. Keep your eyes (and ears) peeled! 😉Scoham said:https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/610005b1deddb/thomas-sandgaard-relishing-sheffield-wednesday-clashSandgaard arrived in the UK last week and explained why he wanted to be in London during a crucial time of the summer: “Of course, there’s still a heavy focus on the recruiting side and then there’s everything else that happens behind the scenes that obviously I’m a big part of on a daily basis. Many things are so much easier when you deal with them face-to-face instead of doing it by phone, Zoom call or by email, so that’s important that I get to spend some time there.”
(Spoiler alert - he is gonna play a sick guitar solo while Floyd and Harvey form a moshpit in the centre circle).1 -
I am not saying I would agree with it, or that I would like it, simply a hunch.golfaddick said:
So, due to the owner being an ******** ***** **** (fill in your own blanks) we start the season under staffed just so he can have his 5 mins of glory on deadline day.Braziliance said:I said before it wouldn't surprise me if it's all a part of the Thomas Sandgaard show, I can imagine him relishing at the idea of a few transfer deadline day signings to push the club on social media and get some praise.
If I was a betting man I reckon we will grab at least two players on frees, about 3 loans and will spend a bit of whack on a marquee signing on the very last day to make it dramatic. I may be completely wrong but I'm just making a call based on the type of character I think he is
Weird way of looking at it.
This is an owner to me who looks like he will thrive off of deadline day drama but actually have the super duper phone, that's the difference.
0 -
Clare and particularly Dobson seem to be upgrades, too early to say on McG, Famewo we have a great chance to fully assess him with the option to buy, and Stockley on a perm is a great piece of business imho. Clearly we're several pieces short, but it's just taken longer to do the business we want, as it has for other teams. Imagine any residual gaps in 5 weeks will be filled in by loans, as it should be if you're building a long-term squad and the players you want aren't available permanently. The only place we'll be short next Saturday in the first XI is a left back, and that's due to injury. As others, I'm quite impressed with Ipswich's signings and think they must be being more liberal with wages, everyone else seems on a par with us or worse if you look at their squads. Personally think Wigan's business has actually been pretty poor and people would be unhappy if those were our signings.AFKABartram said:Skipped about a thousand posts so apologies if it’s emerged more clearly why. call me Wibbling Walter if you like, but absolutely astounded we’ve got this far into the summer only signing / replacing what we have.No idea of the reasons, not moaning about it, but absolutely nothing like the summer rebuild I was expecting. We might well end up where we are wanting to be come the end of the window, but I anticipated something far more impacting by this stage.
In short, agree it's taken longer than we'd all expected, but it's only 1 or 2 signings behind expectations at this stage, surely? 1 winger being absolute priority! AM, CB, LB, ST being the residual 'squad gaps'. Gk as a luxury 6th so we can send out AMB, and short term CM loan to cover JFC maybe. I reckon we'll get 5 in, 6 if Schwartz isn't going to feature.2 -
Don’t think he needs to look for praise he should have that from every true fan who going to be able to look forward to seeing their team in action. next Saturday again ..Braziliance said:I said before it wouldn't surprise me if it's all a part of the Thomas Sandgaard show, I can imagine him relishing at the idea of a few transfer deadline day signings to push the club on social media and get some praise.
If I was a betting man I reckon we will grab at least two players on frees, about 3 loans and will spend a bit of whack on a marquee signing on the very last day to make it dramatic. I may be completely wrong but I'm just making a call based on the type of character I think he is1 -
I bet both Wyke and Piggot both received substantial signing on fees along with all of Wigan's signings.Cafc43v3r said:
Up until the comma your 100% right. That's exactly what every club is doing.Rothko said:
I get the feeling those clubs are holding out for a fee, and are hoping Ipswich and Wigan’s jacuzzi of cash will wash upon them.RonnieMoore said:
But they not gone anywhere else either …Chris_from_Sidcup said:I can't be the only one who's surprised by the fact that Ogilvie and Tucker are still at Gillingham, Boyle is still at Cheltenham, Kirk and Dale still at Crewe, Randall still at Exeter.
There's a number of top quality players at smaller clubs that we should be in for. If we could even sign 2 of the above it'd improve us immensely.
How much, roughly, have Ipswich and Wigan spent on transfer fees? Say compared to us?
Wyke and Piggot both "cost" nothing in transfer fees. If we paid a fee of about 400k for Stockley that equates to about about 2.5k a week over 3 years. Which would put Stockley in the same ball park in terms of cost.
There is no Jacuzzi of cash, Ipswich have funded it buy getting rid of their whole 1st team squad from last season and selling two of their best young players. Wigan had no wage bill to start with and have generally signed free agents on comparative wages to what we already had.1 -
Just when the 'where are the signings / be patient' loop was starting to ease into a more gallows humour type feel, the gaffer goes and aligns with Golfie - can i recommend you read the last 100 pages AFKA and undergo some group mental correction whereby you will hopefully end up believing we are in a great position - Golfie is a single minded force of nature and I respect him for that so hasn't been swayed by this - me - i understand the view on both sides but we will only know when the window shuts and that's a concern because season ticket sales is obviously my raison d'etre. Any 'division blowing signings' bump in sales is gonna hindered by the fact that many seats that may have been available have been sold on a match day basis for the Sheffield Wednesday game. Guess people will end up waiting til after that game to buy or buy one in an undesireable location. One of those end blocks in the east or west - could be renamed the fairweather blocks?1
-
I actually posted the same a couple of months ago.doronron said:January is where our transfer window will be crucial but think that is where our team will be completed and push on to a top six finish
But as a joke and got a fair few lols.
0 -
Don't you think Stockley, Clare, Dobson etc received signing on fees?Addickted said:
I bet both Wyke and Piggot both received substantial signing on fees along with all of Wigan's signings.Cafc43v3r said:
Up until the comma your 100% right. That's exactly what every club is doing.Rothko said:
I get the feeling those clubs are holding out for a fee, and are hoping Ipswich and Wigan’s jacuzzi of cash will wash upon them.RonnieMoore said:
But they not gone anywhere else either …Chris_from_Sidcup said:I can't be the only one who's surprised by the fact that Ogilvie and Tucker are still at Gillingham, Boyle is still at Cheltenham, Kirk and Dale still at Crewe, Randall still at Exeter.
There's a number of top quality players at smaller clubs that we should be in for. If we could even sign 2 of the above it'd improve us immensely.
How much, roughly, have Ipswich and Wigan spent on transfer fees? Say compared to us?
Wyke and Piggot both "cost" nothing in transfer fees. If we paid a fee of about 400k for Stockley that equates to about about 2.5k a week over 3 years. Which would put Stockley in the same ball park in terms of cost.
There is no Jacuzzi of cash, Ipswich have funded it buy getting rid of their whole 1st team squad from last season and selling two of their best young players. Wigan had no wage bill to start with and have generally signed free agents on comparative wages to what we already had.
Our total squad wage bill will still be higher than Wigan's. Most of thier new signings will be on comparative wages to the likes of Watson, Gilbey, Gunter, Matthews, Washington etc that we already had. None of their legecy, for want of another word, were on anything like that.0 -
From what I hear we are still bidding on players but the other clubs want more than we're offering.
Now you can spin that as "we're being sensible and not being held to ransom, we'll go back nearer the end of the window and get a lower price"
Or
"we're being unrealistic and TS is too tight/skint to spend what's needed to get promotion"
depending on how full/empty your glass is.38 -
Because (with very few exceptions) it's nearly impossible to be sure which kids are going to make it in the game or not. Sometimes a really promising 15-16 year old fizzles out. Sometimes a less spectacular player develops when hit with the adolescence stick.addick1956 said:
What is the point of our academy then. They may be better but so what, half of them have proved inadequate to say the least or simply hardly used. Cullen and Bielik were older anyway. Cullen was 22 or so when he came. Bielik 20.Addick Addict said:
Perhaps because they might be better than our players of the same age? That is the theory and another Conor Gallagher or two will do nicely. That said, I believe that Adkins will be prepared to blood our youngsters even if they aren't the finished article - something that his predecessor was reluctant to do hence his reliance on old pros which, whilst giving stability, stifled both pace and inventiveness within the side.addick1956 said:A few weeks ago I said that NA and TS shouldn't have bigged us up so much at the end of last season . We all know that promotion is the aim.
I was lambasted.
When I said that if a player is good enough then they are old enough.
I even added a list of some players through the decades that had come good from early on.
For that I was abused , unfairly, I think.
Football had changed. Players are fitter than they were some time ago.
Here we are now with others contemplating Ghandour et Al as possible contenders. These players are modern young players who are as fit as any other for the times. Given our older players break down regularly over stretching , anyone can get injured.
Washington over stretched at Wimbledon trying for a ball that was going out of play anyway. Result he pulled a muscle trying to slow up I believe. That injury happened to a seasoned player.
We will need more in the squad and the younger ones will be needed no matter what.
Quite why we should rely on loan players of the same age as our own young players is strange because it doesn't help them, just a Premiership club.
Very few of them will ever go straight into the senior team but a lot of those who don't make it straight away end up playing regularly in lower divisions.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Tough luck mate.golfaddick said:
If I wanted to watch a rock show I would go buy a ticket to see the Rolling Stones. I bought a season ticket at the Valley to watch football.MickeyBennett said:
My sources tell me Sandgaard has something very special in store for us next week. Keep your eyes (and ears) peeled! 😉Scoham said:https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/610005b1deddb/thomas-sandgaard-relishing-sheffield-wednesday-clashSandgaard arrived in the UK last week and explained why he wanted to be in London during a crucial time of the summer: “Of course, there’s still a heavy focus on the recruiting side and then there’s everything else that happens behind the scenes that obviously I’m a big part of on a daily basis. Many things are so much easier when you deal with them face-to-face instead of doing it by phone, Zoom call or by email, so that’s important that I get to spend some time there.”
(Spoiler alert - he is gonna play a sick guitar solo while Floyd and Harvey form a moshpit in the centre circle).1 -
Well he obviously knows we aren't signing anyone 🙄🙄17 -
Haha I can imagine the breakdown the ‘announce someone’ crew are having with that news11
-
A fair few people are gonna have the shakes after reading Cawley's tweet.
It's me, I'm people10 -
Looks like the mood music suggests that the key business we’ll be doing is going to be loans. I was this coming season hoping that it was going to be the other way around. Never mind. It is what it is. If that’s the reality then what I want to see is loans coming in that are not Premier League punts like Levitt, Smith etc but more along the lines of Stockley. Not purely based on hindsight and the relative successes of those players but because I think there are plenty of players out there in The Championship who like Stockley at Preston wasn’t going to feature and are surplus to squads. Experienced players who would prefer to be playing and not kicking their heels with no prospect of football. I’m guessing even Championship clubs need to get some wages off the books. No idea who might be available but I’m sure Steve Gallen does. That’s not to say that we shouldn’t take a PL youngster but more that we need players that are definitely going to be able to offer NA real choices.4
-
Spot on, and it's that polarisation of views that sustains this thread.Henry Irving said:From what I hear we are still bidding on players but the other clubs want more than we're offering.
Now you can spin that as "we're being sensible and not being held to ransom, we'll go back nearer the end of the window and get a lower price"
Or
"we're being unrealistic and TS is too tight/skint to spend what's needed to get promotion"
depending on how full/empty your glass is.
For my part I'm more Golfie than Ronnie Moore, but I live in hope that we'll have what we need at the death0 -
The point of an Academy is to produce first teamers. I am absolutely all for the progression of our youngsters and take a particular interest in the progress of the likes of James Beadle (and his brother, Harry, who was released by us but now doing well at Colchester) Euan Williams and Richard Chin who my son has got to know over the years.addick1956 said:
What is the point of our academy then. They may be better but so what, half of them have proved inadequate to say the least or simply hardly used. Cullen and Bielik were older anyway. Cullen was 22 or so when he came. Bielik 20.Addick Addict said:
Perhaps because they might be better than our players of the same age? That is the theory and another Conor Gallagher or two will do nicely. That said, I believe that Adkins will be prepared to blood our youngsters even if they aren't the finished article - something that his predecessor was reluctant to do hence his reliance on old pros which, whilst giving stability, stifled both pace and inventiveness within the side.addick1956 said:A few weeks ago I said that NA and TS shouldn't have bigged us up so much at the end of last season . We all know that promotion is the aim.
I was lambasted.
When I said that if a player is good enough then they are old enough.
I even added a list of some players through the decades that had come good from early on.
For that I was abused , unfairly, I think.
Football had changed. Players are fitter than they were some time ago.
Here we are now with others contemplating Ghandour et Al as possible contenders. These players are modern young players who are as fit as any other for the times. Given our older players break down regularly over stretching , anyone can get injured.
Washington over stretched at Wimbledon trying for a ball that was going out of play anyway. Result he pulled a muscle trying to slow up I believe. That injury happened to a seasoned player.
We will need more in the squad and the younger ones will be needed no matter what.
Quite why we should rely on loan players of the same age as our own young players is strange because it doesn't help them, just a Premiership club.
For various reasons, we haven't had many of our products in the first team in the last year or so but that isn't to say that we won't have a lot more under Adkins in the course of the next couple of seasons. If they aren't good enough yet though, are we really in a position to turn our nose up at (and whatever age they are) a Gallacher, Cullen, Bielik, Maatsen, Inniss, Leko or Dasilva? Quality not quantity should be the objective.1 -
A big problem with this terrible thread is I think people just forget (or refuse to acknowledge) that two things can be true at once, which is often an issue on here. We need more players, that's true, and ideally we would have brought them all in on the first day of the transfer window opening. Sure. I don't think there's anyone who looks at our squad and thinks 'job done'. The other thing that is true though is that while it's ideal to get players in early so they can all become best friends jogging round the park together, that's only if the players are available. We've already heard from Gallen that Clare had only been available for 48 hours before we signed him; players' availability shifts as clubs make final decisions on them, and that's going to mostly be happening around deadline day. Not ideal, but it's the reality we'll be working with. We know we need more players, but they might not come before the season actually starts because that's the nature of the transfer window and other clubs' ways of managing their resources. That's why I don't understand all the hand-wringing on here, when the window closes is the time to assess and possibly have a little cry, especially given that if we just signed players to get bodies in people would be complaining about that all season. Instead we've got people handing the title to Ipswich because they've signed a few names they've heard of. 11 in for Ipswich, 22 out; they had a hell of a lot of work to do and they still do.We need players. The players will probably come late due to reasons outside of our control. It's ok to not be happy with the current squad, but also we're not at death's door because we haven't got all our signings done in June.31
-
He's only having a couple of weeks off, so as some say... WIOTOS, is about it for now.Braziliance said:A fair few people are gonna have the shakes after reading Cawley's tweet.
It's me, I'm people0 -
Maybe because they are overpriced?Chris_from_Sidcup said:I can't be the only one who's surprised by the fact that Ogilvie and Tucker are still at Gillingham, Boyle is still at Cheltenham, Kirk and Dale still at Crewe, Randall still at Exeter.
There's a number of top quality players at smaller clubs that we should be in for. If we could even sign 2 of the above it'd improve us immensely.
Right now, it's been reported that most of these players have been valued by their clubs at around £1m each.
Which League One club is going to spend that money on a League One or League 2 player + wages?
You can't really blame those clubs in the present situation.
Starved of income over the past 18 months, if they are to lose their star player and prized asset, they don't want to give that player away cheaply.
Maybe when the window is about to slam shut, they'll have a rethink if their bank manager pressures them to.
That's when a £1m price quote can turn into £350,000, perhaps?
Prospective buyers know this and could be a good reason while these players haven't yet been transferred.
And why Charlton hasn't been in any hurry to spend more money than they think they need to?
8 -
Sponsored links:
-
I think it's more a case of the way it has been said. It was also caveated with a "not moaning about it, but absolutely nothing like the summer rebuild I was expecting". That's fair and I don't think it has been the summer rebuild any of us expected. I didn't expect 11 days between signings either as that feels an age.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Classic Charlton life.AFKABartram said:Skipped about a thousand posts so apologies if it’s emerged more clearly why. call me Wibbling Walter if you like, but absolutely astounded we’ve got this far into the summer only signing / replacing what we have.No idea of the reasons, not moaning about it, but absolutely nothing like the summer rebuild I was expecting. We might well end up where we are wanting to be come the end of the window, but I anticipated something far more impacting by this stage.
Golfie posts something similar and gets about 2 pages of abuse, negative nancy, why do you bother supporting the club etc. The boss man posts and gets (currently) 29 likes!
However there's still 31 days until the window closes so there's time for us to get in enough players to add quality and depth. I have zero doubt it will be a mix of loans and permies.
(I'd prefer 7/8 permies and no loans, but will be realistic)1 -
Worth looking back at the Sunderland series and seeing the brinkmanship that goes on. In that situation, the chairman panicked and paid way over the odds, then realised he couldn't afford to run the club.Henry Irving said:From what I hear we are still bidding on players but the other clubs want more than we're offering.
Now you can spin that as "we're being sensible and not being held to ransom, we'll go back nearer the end of the window and get a lower price"
Or
"we're being unrealistic and TS is too tight/skint to spend what's needed to get promotion"
depending on how full/empty your glass is.
I'm (as ever) in the glass half full camp, waiting, increasingly nervously, for rabbits to be pulled out of hats. I was never expecting a total rebuild but like most expected more by now.
It doesn't take too much reading between the lines to see that there's a fair bit of tension between the main protagonists (with Atkins you have to look at what he doesn't say, not what he says, as he has the mantra of only speaking positively). Sangaard coming over should be seen in that light - he's had to put some personal focus on things to turn it around and sort some issues, I would think.3 -
Cawley being off only adds to the excitement, the rumours (if there are any) will be out of control cos he’s not here for the arbitrary “not someone CAFC are looking at” tweet.8
-
GM with the voice of reason again. Agree 100%.Garrymanilow said:A big problem with this terrible thread is I think people just forget (or refuse to acknowledge) that two things can be true at once, which is often an issue on here. We need more players, that's true, and ideally we would have brought them all in on the first day of the transfer window opening. Sure. I don't think there's anyone who looks at our squad and thinks 'job done'. The other thing that is true though is that while it's ideal to get players in early so they can all become best friends jogging round the park together, that's only if the players are available. We've already heard from Gallen that Clare had only been available for 48 hours before we signed him; players' availability shifts as clubs make final decisions on them, and that's going to mostly be happening around deadline day. Not ideal, but it's the reality we'll be working with. We know we need more players, but they might not come before the season actually starts because that's the nature of the transfer window and other clubs' ways of managing their resources. That's why I don't understand all the hand-wringing on here, when the window closes is the time to assess and possibly have a little cry, especially given that if we just signed players to get bodies in people would be complaining about that all season. Instead we've got people handing the title to Ipswich because they've signed a few names they've heard of. 11 in for Ipswich, 22 out; they had a hell of a lot of work to do and they still do.We need players. The players will probably come late due to reasons outside of our control. It's ok to not be happy with the current squad, but also we're not at death's door because we haven't got all our signings done in June.3 -
Probably stress related from getting bombarded by everyone about who we are supposed to be signing.....Cafc43v3r said:
Well he obviously knows we aren't signing anyone 🙄🙄1 -
I am not supposed to say this but he has actually go to the Wrexham Evening News on 250k a year, but don't say I told you.king addick said:
Probably stress related from getting bombarded by everyone about who we are supposed to be signing.....Cafc43v3r said:
Well he obviously knows we aren't signing anyone 🙄🙄8 -
Why not go to America and to buy a ticket to see the Rolling Stones, Golfie?golfaddick said:
If I wanted to watch a rock show I would go buy a ticket to see the Rolling Stones. I bought a season ticket at the Valley to watch football.MickeyBennett said:
My sources tell me Sandgaard has something very special in store for us next week. Keep your eyes (and ears) peeled! 😉Scoham said:https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/610005b1deddb/thomas-sandgaard-relishing-sheffield-wednesday-clashSandgaard arrived in the UK last week and explained why he wanted to be in London during a crucial time of the summer: “Of course, there’s still a heavy focus on the recruiting side and then there’s everything else that happens behind the scenes that obviously I’m a big part of on a daily basis. Many things are so much easier when you deal with them face-to-face instead of doing it by phone, Zoom call or by email, so that’s important that I get to spend some time there.”
(Spoiler alert - he is gonna play a sick guitar solo while Floyd and Harvey form a moshpit in the centre circle).
0 -
Please don’t tell me it’s an either/or.Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
Spot on, and it's that polarisation of views that sustains this thread.Henry Irving said:From what I hear we are still bidding on players but the other clubs want more than we're offering.
Now you can spin that as "we're being sensible and not being held to ransom, we'll go back nearer the end of the window and get a lower price"
Or
"we're being unrealistic and TS is too tight/skint to spend what's needed to get promotion"
depending on how full/empty your glass is.
For my part I'm more Golfie than Ronnie Moore, but I live in hope that we'll have what we need at the death4 -
If he’s off to Suffolk for the weekend I’m gonna lose it..Cafc43v3r said:
Well he obviously knows we aren't signing anyone 🙄🙄17 -
I know I am an optimist by nature, but I really don't feel worried about this season at all yet. Of course I would want more players in by now, but it's rare that any football team has all it's pieces in place before the transfer deadline window.
All in all, I think the business we have done so far is very good (Clare especially), and I trust Gallen to get it right considering he has done so more often then not under much worse circumstances. I also feel, as is natural for football fans, that many are under estimating our manager, and current players.
Of course if the transfer window 'slams shut' and we have not covered those areas we desperately need, then I would begin to worry. But I have the feeling we will see some real quality exciting players added to the squad before then.7
This discussion has been closed.
