Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Post-match Thread: Sheffield Wednesday vs Charlton Athletic | Saturday 13th August 2022

LoOkOuT
LoOkOuT Posts: 10,859
edited August 2022 in General Charlton
I’m going to keep this one relatively brief. Unlike our last outing, we were fluid and effective form kick off. So much so, Sheffield Wed looked shellshocked and their supporters went from exuberant to quiet, to anxious in a short amount of time. We were fluid going forward and applied pressure that they found hard to play through. Unfortunately we couldn’t find the goal to reward our efforts.

It took 70+ minutes for Charlton legs to tire and Wed to gain a foothold and mount an attack. Even then, we looked comfortable at the back and Wed never looked like scoring. Until they did. Wed brought on substitutes and made tactical changes that I think Ben Garner was a little late in reacting to. On 80 mins, Wed found the breakthrough they were hoping for. 1-0 to the home side, despite being outclassed throughout.

Unfortunately, it was an afternoon with plenty to find comfort in, except the result! When we can’t get enough forward and numbers into the box, we’re always going to struggle. Today, we were lacking in the final third. Football’s a funny game: you don’t always get what you deserve, either way. Sometimes you get the points off a poor performance and sometimes it’s a great performance with no reward. It’s a long season and, for the long haul, I find comfort in our performance (I’d be less enthused if I followed Wed); we’ve got a ways to go, but we’ve got an attacking threat coming in and we’ve got plenty of room to improve. 

Sheff Wed 1 Charlton 0
«13456712

Comments

  • Exact opposite of derby game, we outplayed them for the vast majority and couldn’t score, sucker punched and lost.


  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,047
    Draw, win, loss from our first three games. Mid-table form from what will probably be a mid table team unfortunately.

    Disappointing result. We desperately need a striker or we aren’t going to do much this season. 

    We looked like the better team for about 70 mins, but we tired badly after that and Sheffield Wednesday had very decent players that they could bring on whereas we really don’t.
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    Should be a Happy Clappers fest this one...
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,866
    cazo said:
    Stockley was shit as was Kirk not fucking interested sell stockley if we can and Kirk thay are shit
    deep breaths fella, deep breaths. 
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 2,978
    well i got that wright, went the way i thought. if you do not have recognised strikers who can take the chances this will happen more often during the season.
  • Decent football. No end product.


  • Sponsored links:



  • EveshamAddick
    EveshamAddick Posts: 7,019
    cazo said:
    Stockley was shit as was Kirk not fucking interested sell stockley if we can and Kirk thay are shit
    Apart from that, all good?
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    Hopefully TS is being told we need a new forward.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,683
    edited August 2022
    In order to win promotion you have to win games like this.
    Seriously we were the better team and lost.

    C***S 
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,735
    Great first half performance but second half felt like it was all Wednesday. Desperately need a striker for this system and I'd be switching up the starting midfield as I haven't seen anything from Fraser in all the time he's been with us.

    Lots of things to be encouraged about there, but it's another late goal conceded and could have easily been a couple more added after the opener. 
  • The front 3 who started are the worry for me and where the goals will come from. I think the collective unit is my main worry rather than individuals
  • TEL
    TEL Posts: 10,100
    I'd have subbed Stockley and Fraser at half time. Kirk wasn't great. Rest of the team played well.

    i don't think Stockley is going to fit this style of play. He's too static and doesn't chase the ball down. Yet to see Fraser have a good game to be honest. Kirk meh..
  • I personally am very encouraged by that. To go to Wednesday and dominate like we did for so as long as we did, is a sign of our quality.

    If we play the same against Plymouth and Cambridge at home, but don’t pick up goals or the win, then I’ll start to panic a little.

    Biggest issue today is the quality we lacked off the bench. I think Miles is a fantastic talent, but it was calling out for a player with Anekes quality to bring on. But it’s a shame our Aneke quality player is injured. 
  • Billyboy
    Billyboy Posts: 520
    Forward that can play how garner wants, as stockley can't, slows the whole attack down
  • Sponsored links:



  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,587
    Powder puff up front, not going to score enough goals. Stockley doesn’t fit the system, Leaburn raw and not ready to play up top on his own, Aneke seemingly not fit yet. Another striker desperately needed. Two homes games in a week now. Let’s not be having this same conversation next Saturday come 5pm. Midfielders need to step up to the plate too. 
  • ozaddick
    ozaddick Posts: 2,846
    We had plenty of chances to win that. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,331
    I watched the second half. 

    Our main issue to resolve is the centre forward. 

    If McGrandles would start resembling a footballer, that'd be nice too. 
  • cs1986
    cs1986 Posts: 1,529
    Anyone still want to tell me Stockley will get 20+ league goals?

    Hes a good player but not in a 4 3 3 or as a lone striker. We worked that out last year under Adkins. Charlton love to do the same shit different day.


  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    Dazzler21 said:
    Hopefully TS is being told we need a new forward.
    he was there at Hillsborough. No doubt saw that for himself?


  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 2,978
    lets not look to Aneke to make our season. will be lucky if he plays in 50% of games and mainly not 45 mins either.
  • cs1986
    cs1986 Posts: 1,529
    Leuth said:
    I watched the second half. 

    Our main issue to resolve is the centre forward. 

    If McGrandles would start resembling a footballer, that'd be nice too. 
    Agree with this completely. Disappointed in what I have seen of McGrandles so far he looks a donkey
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,629
    we didn't take our chances and therefore didn't deserve anything, we desperately need a striker who plays to this system.
  • ElliotCAFC
    ElliotCAFC Posts: 2,553
    McGrandles played like he was still concussed. I’ve got to say, I’d have much preferred Alex Gilbey’s energy coming on in a game like this.