Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard ownership discussion 2022-3 onwards (Meeting with CAST p138)

1143144146148149170

Comments

  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,668
    Just read all of today's posts. 

    And I'm still of the opinion 

    Sandgaard is a prick. 

    Sorry if that offends 
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782
    https://twitter.com/franco_5_/status/1590434848157863937?s=46&t=GgvJvSBRdEucAE_8tVR-Mw


    Presumably we may get a few players worth of finance then? 

    Gunter, Lockyer?, Williams, Smith? & wallacot
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    No to Lockyer (last game July 2020) and Smith (last game Feb 2020).

    Yes to Gunter (March 2022), Williams (Jan 2021) and Wollacott.
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,961
    Just read all of today's posts. 

    And I'm still of the opinion 

    Sandgaard is a prick. 

    Sorry if that offends 
    Rubbish, Blackpool. It doesn't even rhyme.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    No to Lockyer (last game July 2020) and Smith (last game Feb 2020).

    Yes to Gunter (March 2022), Williams (Jan 2021) and Wollacott.
    Levitt? 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    No to Lockyer (last game July 2020) and Smith (last game Feb 2020).

    Yes to Gunter (March 2022), Williams (Jan 2021) and Wollacott.
    Levitt? 
    Loans don't count do they?
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    Dazzler21 said:
    No to Lockyer (last game July 2020) and Smith (last game Feb 2020).

    Yes to Gunter (March 2022), Williams (Jan 2021) and Wollacott.
    Levitt? 
    Loans don't count do they?
    Absolutely no idea. 
  • DubaiCAFC
    DubaiCAFC Posts: 2,461
    Dazzler21 said:
    No to Lockyer (last game July 2020) and Smith (last game Feb 2020).

    Yes to Gunter (March 2022), Williams (Jan 2021) and Wollacott.
    Levitt? 
    Loans don't count do they?
    Absolutely no idea. 
    Suppose it depends on the amount of the players salary is being paid by the club.
  • Off_it said:
    Funny isnt it, we win some games and this thread isnt so popular .....
    Because people don’t want to hear it, rather than because short-term results demonstrate underlying change. Nothing is going to happen on the pitch to make Sandgaard’s ownership work, IMO, but most of us are interested in the football in front of us most of the time. Otherwise we wouldn’t be paying attention at all.
    The only thing that can make his ownership work, is on the pitch. 

    Get into the playoffs, win them and suddenly everything could look a lot different.
    Not gonna happen with this squad, once all the games in hand have been played, I suspect we will be back in mid-table looking up.  
    Win tomorrow and we could be 1 point off the play offs.
  • Bailey
    Bailey Posts: 3,265
    I would love us to be in and around the playoffs by the January window, TS would then be in a position to back up his bold words of a couple of weeks back when declaring the will be looking to get new signings in early if possible, I remain sceptical but in fairness if that League position was achieved I think it would be the first time that the club,under TS, would be looking at the top six in January, we were well off the pace last year and Chuks was brought in but on the down side that was before the declaration of the intention to break even was announced.  
  • Sponsored links:



  • Off_it said:
    Funny isnt it, we win some games and this thread isnt so popular .....
    Because people don’t want to hear it, rather than because short-term results demonstrate underlying change. Nothing is going to happen on the pitch to make Sandgaard’s ownership work, IMO, but most of us are interested in the football in front of us most of the time. Otherwise we wouldn’t be paying attention at all.
    The only thing that can make his ownership work, is on the pitch. 

    Get into the playoffs, win them and suddenly everything could look a lot different.
    Not gonna happen with this squad, once all the games in hand have been played, I suspect we will be back in mid-table looking up.  
    Win tomorrow and we could be 1 point off the play offs.
    "Always look on the bright side of life".
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Never a fan of digging this thread out after a loss...but in light if Garners comments this evening, think it deserves an airing.
  • Bilko
    Bilko Posts: 767
    It’s time to sell up, I’m afraid we won’t go forward with TS at the wheel:
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Where is he these days anyway?
     Hardly hear a peep out of him
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,254
    Came with good intentions, but his execution has been as successful as Stockley’s record of goals from open play this season.  

    He’s definitely done with us as well, save for hoping he can get someone to come in and offer something so he doesn’t have to put us in admin and write off the loss completely 

    Heard QPR have an offer lined up for Leaburn today as well, however true that may be.  It’s not out of this world and sounds similar to what we probably got for Burstow last season.  I would imagine he’ll take that all day long 
  • fmaddick
    fmaddick Posts: 182
    Isn’t it accepted that we’ve got one of the highest budgets  in the division? Certainly top 5-6 I’d think?

    in which case whose fault is it the money has seemingly been misspent?
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    cabbles said:
    Came with good intentions, but his execution has been as successful as Stockley’s record of goals from open play this season.  

    He’s definitely done with us as well, save for hoping he can get someone to come in and offer something so he doesn’t have to put us in admin and write off the loss completely 

    Heard QPR have an offer lined up for Leaburn today as well, however true that may be.  It’s not out of this world and sounds similar to what we probably got for Burstow last season.  I would imagine he’ll take that all day long 
     Debatable. Clearly, He had no intention of following up on any of his good intentions.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    fmaddick said:
    Isn’t it accepted that we’ve got one of the highest budgets  in the division? Certainly top 5-6 I’d think?

    in which case whose fault is it the money has seemingly been misspent?
    Martin's mainly.
  • Sponsored links:



  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,220
    edited November 2022
    fmaddick said:
    Isn’t it accepted that we’ve got one of the highest budgets  in the division? Certainly top 5-6 I’d think?

    in which case whose fault is it the money has seemingly been misspent?
    Without seeing to hand what other teams budgets are on this division then we don’t know. How Sandgaard seemed to know this earlier on in the season is a mystery to me 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    edited November 2022
    What I imagine Sandgaard may have done was looked at how much money we lose and count that as the budget. I would say we lose some of that money because people don't want to support an owner who is a football idiot. Not only that, his regime is a bullying one which takes away some of the passion too. The sooner the cnut leaves the better for us. 
  • Doesn’t sound good.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    What does he mean by limited amount of the budget available to him?

    Another Sandgaard contract anomaly perhaps?
  • We are going absolutely nowhere under TS.  I actually now want him to sell up and f*ck right off!
  • I read as he was promised we'd back him a certain amount and instead it was freebies, loans and less bodies in than he wanted.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,284
    It’s perfectly clear that Tight Thommy gaslighted him.
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,559
    What does he mean by limited amount of the budget available to him?

    Another Sandgaard contract anomaly perhaps?
    Think as has been said elsewhere that the budget was xxx but yyy was already spent on existing contracts etc leaving Ben with diddly squat to work with.