Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Garner Gawn? (Ed. CORRECT - GARNER SACKED p6, and again by Colchester p32)
Comments
-
4 -
There's no conspiracy here Mutts.MuttleyCAFC said:
We can't be sure about this but it is highly plausible.carly burn said:Garners sacking was nothing to do with results. More to do with telling this awful owner what he didn't want to hear about his abysmal tenure.
#sandgaardout
I'm just basing it on what I've heard from Garner pre and post match for weeks now.
If he was telling us he hasn't been given the tools to do the job one can only imagine he was constantly giving it to Sandgaard.0 -
Has TS made a statement yet.0
-
My portsmouth (where he got sacked from) mate's comment:DOUCHER said:Kenny Jackett - putting his previous to one side, we could do a lot worse - and probably will
"good god don't take him on board unless you want to be sent to sleep...might get you a few wins but the football won't be entertaining. Didn't last long at Orient, can'see him being any good for you. He might be cheap though".1 -
I was thinking the very same thing Doucher, get old 'Thunder Boots' in there. Sandgaard has made a big enough prat of himself so far, but I reckon with an ego that big there's room for more.DOUCHER said:I shouldn’t but part of me hopes he appoints his son, just for the laugh 😂0 -
I know. I am reading into it that Garner demanded what was needed in the next window and Sandgaard doesn't want to supply it. A new manager, like Garner did when he was appointed, will play ball initially as they want the job.carly burn said:
There's no conspiracy here Mutts.MuttleyCAFC said:
We can't be sure about this but it is highly plausible.carly burn said:Garners sacking was nothing to do with results. More to do with telling this awful owner what he didn't want to hear about his abysmal tenure.
#sandgaardout
I'm just basing it on what I've heard from Garner pre and post match for weeks now.
If he was telling us he hasn't been given the tools to do the job one can only imagine he was constantly giving it to Sandgaard.0 -
Not advocating Jackett by any means but look at some of the football the dinosaur, hoofball, turgid Mowbray has got Sunderland playing this season.BigRedEvil said:Jackett would have been good about 6 years ago, now not so sure
Managerial success is more if the players are any good and if they respect/like the manager.
Most of them aren't "bad" managers. I don't buy into yesterday's man, the game doesn't change that much.2 -
I think we had Curbs but no Appleton yet.Manic_mania said:late to the thread but... just for my own personal peace of mind and wellbeing, have we done the Appleton picture and "Curbs 14-1" posts yet?0 -
Could have said that about Jacko too!Swisdom said:Fucking daft decision
we didn’t back him. Didn’t give him any money. Didn’t give him any time. He was expected to completely change the culture at the club despite all those factors.
he’s better off out of it. I am growing increasingly fucked off with this club2 - Sponsored links:
-
I think you are very close to the truth Carly.carly burn said:Garners sacking was nothing to do with results. More to do with telling this awful owner what he didn't want to hear about his abysmal tenure.
#sandgaardout4 -
100% this. I think JJs transfer expectations were a bit to ambitions for Sandgaard too.Kap10 said:
Could have said that about Jacko too!Swisdom said:Fucking daft decision
we didn’t back him. Didn’t give him any money. Didn’t give him any time. He was expected to completely change the culture at the club despite all those factors.
he’s better off out of it. I am growing increasingly fucked off with this club0 -
I think he asked for what was promised.MuttleyCAFC said:
I know. I am reading into it that Garner demanded what was needed in the next window and Sandgaard doesn't want to supply it. A new manager, like Garner did when he was appointed, will play ball initially as they want the job.carly burn said:
There's no conspiracy here Mutts.MuttleyCAFC said:
We can't be sure about this but it is highly plausible.carly burn said:Garners sacking was nothing to do with results. More to do with telling this awful owner what he didn't want to hear about his abysmal tenure.
#sandgaardout
I'm just basing it on what I've heard from Garner pre and post match for weeks now.
If he was telling us he hasn't been given the tools to do the job one can only imagine he was constantly giving it to Sandgaard.4 -
And Adkins. Penny for his, real, thoughts.Kap10 said:
Could have said that about Jacko too!Swisdom said:Fucking daft decision
we didn’t back him. Didn’t give him any money. Didn’t give him any time. He was expected to completely change the culture at the club despite all those factors.
he’s better off out of it. I am growing increasingly fucked off with this club1 -
Mowbray, for all that he's a colossal dickhead, has always been about good footballCafc43v3r said:
Not advocating Jackett by any means but look at some of the football the dinosaur, hoofball, turgid Mowbray has got Sunderland playing this season.BigRedEvil said:Jackett would have been good about 6 years ago, now not so sure
Managerial success is more if the players are any good and if they respect/like the manager.
Most of them aren't "bad" managers. I don't buy into yesterday's man, the game doesn't change that much.0 -
but hes got a fucking monkeys heid...Leuth said:
Mowbray, for all that he's a colossal dickhead, has always been about good footballCafc43v3r said:
Not advocating Jackett by any means but look at some of the football the dinosaur, hoofball, turgid Mowbray has got Sunderland playing this season.BigRedEvil said:Jackett would have been good about 6 years ago, now not so sure
Managerial success is more if the players are any good and if they respect/like the manager.
Most of them aren't "bad" managers. I don't buy into yesterday's man, the game doesn't change that much.1 -
You look at what you have and that should dictate how you set up. The problem is, we are terribly short in certain positions which makes any sort of system problematic. Even a long ball game!2
-
Only appointing raylean could surpass the potential for comedyBailey said:
I was thinking the very same thing Doucher, get old 'Thunder Boots' in there. Sandgaard has made a big enough prat of himself so far, but I reckon with an ego that big there's room for more.DOUCHER said:I shouldn’t but part of me hopes he appoints his son, just for the laugh 😂1 -
Thomas, if you are reading this, I would just like to state that I had your number from day one, so thank you for proving me right. I never thought we could sink lower than Roland, but congratulations, you have single handedly managed to drag this once great club to a depth most of us didn't think was possible. Any chance of having my season ticket money back, seeing as it was sold to me under false pretenses and lies of building a team capable of pushing us towards promotion. Maybe I should take this up with the trading standards?
Regarding your next appointment, before making promises to him that you have no intention of keeping, then sacking him for not creating miracles, please take this guitar and see how easy it is to perform one of your "epic" rock solo's.
9 -
That’ll be the fella who said ‘We should be beating teams like Charlton’ and to be fair he’d be bang on the money these days 😞.Leuth said:
Mowbray, for all that he's a colossal dickhead, has always been about good footballCafc43v3r said:
Not advocating Jackett by any means but look at some of the football the dinosaur, hoofball, turgid Mowbray has got Sunderland playing this season.BigRedEvil said:Jackett would have been good about 6 years ago, now not so sure
Managerial success is more if the players are any good and if they respect/like the manager.
Most of them aren't "bad" managers. I don't buy into yesterday's man, the game doesn't change that much.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Oh absolutely. Would love to hear them right about nowCafc43v3r said:
And Adkins. Penny for his, real, thoughts.Kap10 said:
Could have said that about Jacko too!Swisdom said:Fucking daft decision
we didn’t back him. Didn’t give him any money. Didn’t give him any time. He was expected to completely change the culture at the club despite all those factors.
he’s better off out of it. I am growing increasingly fucked off with this club1 -
Even Sunday league managers have a left footed centre half and left back.Fumbluff said:2 -
Kenny Jackett it is then.redman said:
My portsmouth (where he got sacked from) mate's comment:DOUCHER said:Kenny Jackett - putting his previous to one side, we could do a lot worse - and probably will
"good god don't take him on board unless you want to be sent to sleep...might get you a few wins but the football won't be entertaining. Didn't last long at Orient, can'see him being any good for you. He might be cheap though".0 -
She would if she had the work permit.DOUCHER said:
Only appointing raylean could surpass the potential for comedyBailey said:
I was thinking the very same thing Doucher, get old 'Thunder Boots' in there. Sandgaard has made a big enough prat of himself so far, but I reckon with an ego that big there's room for more.DOUCHER said:I shouldn’t but part of me hopes he appoints his son, just for the laugh 😂1 -
I’m lost for words. Every time things get real bad I think that’s it we’ve bottomed out. Things can only get better. They just keep getting worse. You have to fear for the whole club to be honest. Not many clubs have year after year after year of crooked or loony owners. The fan base is on its arse. I worry that if we don’t pull out of our tailspin very soon we actually might completely crash and burn.17
-
Well now we know its true, the comment above I posted on P1 of this thread has me concerned but also puzzled!Redmidland said:That, if true, is gonna make the talk of a potential new owner being present at the BHA game somewhat strange!
Why would TS sack a manager and have to pay him off if he's selling the club? He could've left it to the new regime surely?
Concerned - that the thought he is open to selling must be diminishing, why would he pay out a compensation fee if he could've left it to a new owner?
Puzzled - why sack a manager 2 days before a game that could lead to the next round of the FA cup, and not have a proven replacement lined up?
TS caused this mess by not supporting Garner, which idiot is going to come to this dysfunctional outfit?
This won't change until TS goes....and I fear after today's shenanigans, he is going nowhere soon!!
Please TS, just go and take your family with you!!
Ben thank you for trying....you were badly let down by the Sangaards!
Good luck in the future!8 -
I bet if you go through this forum in enough detail you will find all of those description used for him.Leuth said:
Mowbray, for all that he's a colossal dickhead, has always been about good footballCafc43v3r said:
Not advocating Jackett by any means but look at some of the football the dinosaur, hoofball, turgid Mowbray has got Sunderland playing this season.BigRedEvil said:Jackett would have been good about 6 years ago, now not so sure
Managerial success is more if the players are any good and if they respect/like the manager.
Most of them aren't "bad" managers. I don't buy into yesterday's man, the game doesn't change that much.0 -
I would like a memory eraser for Christmas that will allow me to forget I am a Charlton fan! Are there any on ebay?6
-
"I have nothing to declare except my genius"Chippycafc said:Has TS made a statement yet.4 -
Errrm……he’s Danish.cafcsinger said:Can't stand that stupid yank c*** sandgaard5
