Kent CCC 2023
Comments
-
18 off the last 4 balls of Dunn's over.killerandflash said:Nice 6 from Blake, a few more of those are needed0 -
229-2 off 400
-
Blake reaches his 50 off 37 balls0
-
Leaning out for 87 (94)
249-3 off 42.10 -
Stewart has been sent in. With Blake in too, there will hopefully be fireworks from both ends1
-
273-3 off 450
-
Sadly Patel does a really good catch on the boundary, rather than a Sibley drop.0
-
Blake out next ball for 62 off 50. Finch is in.0
-
Clark to Stewart - 4, 6, OUT
Stewart 26 off 12
287-5 off 46.3
Bazley in
1 -
300-5 off 482
-
Sponsored links:
-
Nigel Llong, traitor
Good late cameo by Finch though, didn't think he had it in him.0 -
Brilliant effort late on from Finch with 34 off 17 balls before out LBW off the penultimate ball of the innings. Jaydn Denly comes in for his one and only ball to face.
1 -
And Jaydn guides it for 41
-
330-6 off 501
-
Denly should retire now with a 400 strike rate2
-
Kent bat first: 282-9 and 330-6
Kent bat second: 116 all out and 203 all out3 -
Reckon we are about 200 short.0
-
Lovely shotAddick Addict said:And Jaydn guides it for 41 -
Stewart bags Sibley's wicket
7-11 -
Qadri gets Burns, 105/2.
Could do with getting Patel out, as he's looking more threatening. Maybe he's trying to impress Kent and get a move...0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Breakthrough at last
Burns bowled Qadri 43 (63)
105-2
Surrey require 226 runs off 28.5 overs at 7.841 -
Interesting hearing Simon Hughes talking about Parkinson's action1
-
Parkinson traps Foakes LBW1
-
122-3 off 25 overs
209 required at 8.36 an over1 -
At the same stage we were 131-10
-
Patel out, Surrey in real trouble now1
-
And a wicket to Gilchrist
128-41 -
Can't help thinking that Leaning bowling up top and going for just 37 off 10 overs is not one we would get away with if we played Surrey again tomorrow. Means that there are 23 overs to go and we still have six bowlers to bowl them.0
-
146-4 off 30
Surrey require 185 runs off 20 overs at 9.25 runs an over
1 -
Been impressed with Finch's keeping. He's much better than "someone to take the gloves because nobody else is there"0
