Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kent Cricket 2024

1…1617192122…101

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Notts 2s 377-6 off 76 overs at close of play. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Notts 443-6 dec
    Kent 81-2 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Matt Walker has confirmed that Kent have failed in their attempt to sign an overseas seamer on a short term contract. So we will have to do with what we have. Grant Stewart is playing against Notts and returned figures in their first innings of 15-2-61-0
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Addick Addict said:
    Tom Davis, who came through our academy, is one homegrown fast bowler who many at the county thought had the potential to make it. Injuries played a big part in stalling his career. He's 23 now but clearly not given up (trialed at our pre-season open day too) and is currently playing for Warwickshire 2s where he has actually looked quite sharp in returning figures of 11-1-43-3.
    Tom has taken 5-75 in the 2nd innings for Warwickshire giving him match figures of 28-3-118-8. In the current "land of the blind", taking 8 wickets anywhere is "king".

    Some three or four years ago it was suggested that he was actually the fastest of all the Kent bowlers pre season. Then injuries and one suspects confidence, as a result, took a bit of a knock so it's great to see him back. What is strange is why he isn't playing for our 2s as he was certainly at the open trials but, perhaps, familiarity breeds contempt. Or, a more likely reason and strange as it sounds, is that we actually have too many seamers (11) already on our books and there isn't scope to give a permanent contract to another one - Agar, Gilchrist and Garrett are currently in the 1s, we have three playing in the 2s (Stewart, Jas and Arafat), Cohen (out for the season), Evison and Quinn are all injured, Klaassen is really white ball only and Swanepoel has yet to arrive. That's not to say that we couldn't offer him say a short term contract come the 50 over comp but, one suspects that if he does put a string of performances together, he will already have been signed by someone else. That would be a shame because he is Kent, born and bred and did come through all our age group teams and the Academy. 
  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,820
    Well bowled Tom!  Will he turn out for Canterbury, back in the Premier Division this season?
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Pedro45 said:
    Well bowled Tom!  Will he turn out for Canterbury, back in the Premier Division this season?
    Unless he gets a contract at another county and has to relocate I see no reason why he wouldn't.   
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,738
    Addick Addict said:
    Pedro45 said:
    Well bowled Tom!  Will he turn out for Canterbury, back in the Premier Division this season?
    Unless he gets a contract at another county and has to relocate I see no reason why he wouldn't.   
    One of our own.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    End of day 3:

    Notts 443-6 dec
    Kent  296-5 dec (Richardson 58, O'Riordan 70, Carney 71*, Stewart 50)
    Notts 82-1
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Addick Addict said:
    End of day 3:

    Notts 443-6 dec
    Kent  296-5 dec (Richardson 58, O'Riordan 70, Carney 71*, Stewart 50)
    Notts 82-1
    Why have we declared? Are we desperate to give our bowlers more miles in their legs?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    killerandflash said:
    Addick Addict said:
    End of day 3:

    Notts 443-6 dec
    Kent  296-5 dec (Richardson 58, O'Riordan 70, Carney 71*, Stewart 50)
    Notts 82-1
    Why have we declared? Are we desperate to give our bowlers more miles in their legs?
    I suspect, on the one hand, Kent have had a chance to look at all the batsmen they want to, including a couple of trialists - we have a couple of Academy boys who have done nothing in the match to date but that can be part and parcel of being in the side for some when they first play for the 2s. On the other hand, being the last day tomorrow and with a lead of 229 already, Notts will almost certainly at lunch (if not sooner) declare thus giving the game some meaning and that will give also those same batsmen of ours that the management want to see another opportunity to bat. 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,853
    killerandflash said:
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


    I genuinely believe it is the location of the ground that sets us back. 
  • kentred2
    kentred2 Posts: 2,335
    MrOneLung said:
    killerandflash said:
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


    I genuinely believe it is the location of the ground that sets us back. 
    What Beckenham? Aim is obviously to spread the women’s game geographically. 
    Time for Kent to concentrate solely on Canterbury and the first team?
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Notts smashed 152 for the loss of one wicket off 19 overs this morning to set a target of 382 for us to win. In reply and at lunch, we are 36-0 off 10 overs meaning that we have a minimum of 65 overs to get another 346 runs. 
  • thetomahawkkid
    thetomahawkkid Posts: 763
    kentred2 said:
    MrOneLung said:
    killerandflash said:
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


    I genuinely believe it is the location of the ground that sets us back. 
    What Beckenham? Aim is obviously to spread the women’s game geographically. 
    Time for Kent to concentrate solely on Canterbury and the first team?
    Canterbury is not easy to get to by public transport, particularly from the main Canterbury West station, and it's a long walk. I would go to many more games at Canterbury if there was a decent link to Canterbury West. It must put others off too.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    edited April 2024
    Squad for the game against Surrey commencing tomorrow. With the return of Crawley and Evison, one suspects that the three to be left out will be Muyeye, Jaydn and Arafat

     
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    edited April 2024
    The 2s match has been drawn - Kent finish on 200-5 (Ekansh 42, Perera 50, Richardson 65* & O'Riordan 26) 

    So Ross Richardson, 23 and previously in the Surrey Academy who is a keeper/bat (although he hasn't had the gloves in his two games for us), has had scores in his four innings of 46*, 57, 58 and 65*. 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,853
    kentred2 said:
    MrOneLung said:
    killerandflash said:
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


    I genuinely believe it is the location of the ground that sets us back. 
    What Beckenham? Aim is obviously to spread the women’s game geographically. 
    Time for Kent to concentrate solely on Canterbury and the first team?
    I was thinking Canterbury is not very accessible and that may have counted against us 
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,738
    MrOneLung said:
    kentred2 said:
    MrOneLung said:
    killerandflash said:
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


    I genuinely believe it is the location of the ground that sets us back. 
    What Beckenham? Aim is obviously to spread the women’s game geographically. 
    Time for Kent to concentrate solely on Canterbury and the first team?
    I was thinking Canterbury is not very accessible and that may have counted against us 
    But Chelmsford is ???
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,853
    Fanny Fanackapan said:
    MrOneLung said:
    kentred2 said:
    MrOneLung said:
    killerandflash said:
    Disappointing, considering the number of players that Kent have produced


    I genuinely believe it is the location of the ground that sets us back. 
    What Beckenham? Aim is obviously to spread the women’s game geographically. 
    Time for Kent to concentrate solely on Canterbury and the first team?
    I was thinking Canterbury is not very accessible and that may have counted against us 
    But Chelmsford is ???
    32 mins from Liverpool St

    what is Canterbury from a London station - 90mins or maybe an hour if on the expensive super fast train from St Pancras 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    It's raining. Umpires will inspect once it stops.  
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    Addick Addict said:
    It's raining. Umpires will inspect once it stops.  
    It's a bit early for Fanny to be doing her rain dance 💃 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    edited April 2024
    blackpool72 said:
    Addick Addict said:
    It's raining. Umpires will inspect once it stops.  
    It's a bit early for Fanny to be doing her rain dance 💃 
    There is something quite sad (which you won't appreciate given your allegiances) when the second thought after "why are we on our third 4-day game of the season when we are still in the middle of April?" is "well at least we aren't going to lose if it stays like this!" Such is the height of the bar of expectation of a Kent supporter. 
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,738
    blackpool72 said:
    Addick Addict said:
    It's raining. Umpires will inspect once it stops.  
    It's a bit early for Fanny to be doing her rain dance 💃 
    Oi !!!!

    You can go off people....
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    edited April 2024
    Addick Addict said:
    blackpool72 said:
    Addick Addict said:
    It's raining. Umpires will inspect once it stops.  
    It's a bit early for Fanny to be doing her rain dance 💃 
    There is something quite sad (which you won't appreciate given your allegiances) when the second thought after "why are we on our third 4-day game of the season when we are still in the middle of April?" is "well at least we aren't going to lose if it stays like this!" Such is the height of the bar of expectation of a Kent supporter. 
    Apart from supporting different counties you and me are both on the same page when it comes to most things cricket. 
    3 country games in April is a joke. 
    As for the Hundred, don't get me started. 
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,738
    Surrey won the toss & elected to bowl.

    No Agar ? 
  • 000__Jaaaaay__000
    000__Jaaaaay__000 Posts: 2,342
    Won’t get 10 wickets let alone 20 with that line up. What a farce 
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    Fanny Fanackapan said:
    Surrey won the toss & elected to bowl.

    No Agar ? 
    Ffs Agar is in my fantasy team....
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Surrey won the toss and have elected to bowl. However, there are some major changes from the last game - out go Muyeye, Jaydn, Agar and Gilchrist. In come Crawley, Evison, Arafat and Singh (who wasn't even in the 14). Can only think that one or both of our quicks have failed fitness tests. 
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    It's an interesting Surrey Lineup, I suspect Overton was down to play before he went down with a back injury this morning. Whether it was Ryan Patel or Cam Steel that has come into the side I'm not sure. Does indicate we are back to using Patel as an allrounder as we did when he first broke through after using him as an opener and then number 3 in the last 3 seasons.

Categories

“Marketplace”