Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Charlton Summer Transfer Rumours 2024
Comments
-
Godden in balances May out so you cant count that as new player in. Slightly worse on fact seeing as May is younger & the leagues top goalscorer last season.
I see it that we have signed -
2 defenders
1 striker
1 midfielder
1 back up keeper
I know I'll get pelters but I feel we are still some way off having a squad good enough to be challenging for promotion.
Need another midfielder & a No 1 keeper for starters.10 -
Would hope we go and get a real number 10 in who will be getting double figure goals and assists and then a backup keeper, rest would be bonus/dependent on sales out0
-
need a creative midfielder or 2 and a couple of proper wingers in case this wing back rubbish dont work again.4
-
I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.7 -
I hope not. Because a fit and firing Miles is what we would need to establish ourselves in the Championship - then we'd also get a better price.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.3 -
You have to be realistic as to where we are as a club, if a top end championship or premier league club come in with 5 mill bid, would be tough for us to reject.. As long as this money is being re invested, that is fine.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.8 -
I think it's fair to say we're a way off but that doesn't mean that we haven't done quite well so far I think - outside of maybe Mannion (who is intended as back up anyway) they are all at least decent options and some look better than that. The likes of Ahadme, Berry and Mitchell would be players you'd think most clubs at our level would want. Godden is more of a risk but his record is not bad, albeit it was several years ago.golfaddick said:Godden in balances May out so you cant count that as new player in. Slightly worse on fact seeing as May is younger & the leagues top goalscorer last season.
I see it that we have signed -
2 defenders
1 striker
1 midfielder
1 back up keeper
I know I'll get pelters but I feel we are still some way off having a squad good enough to be challenging for promotion.
Need another midfielder & a No 1 keeper for starters.
Losing May was a blow for sure but one that seemed planned for to a certain extent so not like losing him at the last minute and scrambling for a replacement.
We've done quite well so far - but yes, we definitely need a lot more done still.0 -
Where is Edwards going to be playing though?roseandcrown said:So after Ahadme think we need a GK, CB, 2 Midfielders. Looking good.
Surely not planned as a backup to Small, so if Small is playing then will Edwards slot in at CB or midfield?
0 -
It has to be attempted really unless you have an owner throwing tens of millions at it.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.
Roland and Sandgaard both tried it but it rarely worked out as planned. Injuries ruined some players due to the lack of depth (Vetokele for example) while others weren’t good enough (DJ comes to mind).
You’ve also got to give the best chance by appointing a good manager and properly backing them.
With Nathan Jones I feel we have a great chance of that. So far he’s been backed but we need plenty more. I’m looking forward to seeing who our next few signings are. We should now have quality and depth up front (fitness pending), but a top GK, left sided CB and a couple of midfielders will make a huge difference with three if not four needing to be regular starters.1 -
.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Won't Leaburn have only 6 months left on his contract by January? Hardly think he'd be sold for big bucks then. Think we're counting on him signing another contract, as apparently his parents are suggesting it's the best thing for him.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.1 -
Helpful from Iain Liddle on Twitter… what do we need next?
4 -
Callumcafc said:Helpful from Iain Liddle on Twitter… what do we need next?
Attacking midfielder next for me definitely. Then an experienced CB for depth.8 -
Now we need 25 goals minimum between the pair of them.sam3110 said:If him and Godden have been financed by selling May, then I think overall it's good business, as though we've lost the highest goalscorer in the league, I feel those 2 will contribute to the team game more overall0 -
We 100% need to strengthen the middle of the park as next highest priority looking at that squad depth. Mirroring what others have said but 2 CMs, 1 CB, 1 GK on permanent deals and then maybe some supporting loans to allow us to play with width if desired0
-
We have back up keepers, we need a first choice keeper.Marriott110 said:Would hope we go and get a real number 10 in who will be getting double figure goals and assists and then a backup keeper, rest would be bonus/dependent on sales out14 -
Reams saying we made Louie Sibley an offer, he recently signed for Oxford after leaving Derby.0
-
He needs to play a load more games, with goals, before that will happen.DubaiCAFC said:
You have to be realistic as to where we are as a club, if a top end championship or premier league club come in with 5 mill bid, would be tough for us to reject.. As long as this money is being re invested, that is fine.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.0 -
As long as they're successful. Under Thomas Sandgaard we spent money on young promising players, who would be expected to rise in value, and instead lost money on them. The likes of Kirk, DJ, Lavelle, Fraser. Under Roland/Slade we signed and lost a lot of money on Ajose.sam3110 said:One thing to note as well is whilst the fees involved aren't going to be huge, Mitchell, Edwards, Ahadme and Godden have all cost something, and with the exception of Godden they're all in the early half of their careers, so they do well here and they hit their prime, and they'll have re-sell value
Peterborough have been very successful at this, similarly Brentford, but it's not as easy as it looks.0 -
We really need to tie him down. I'm sure he'll agree to an extended deal, the way we've supported him and indeed spent money on his recovery, but until it actually happens, I'll still be twitchy.balham red said:
Won't Leaburn have only 6 months left on his contract by January? Hardly think he'd be sold for big bucks then. Think we're counting on him signing another contract, as apparently his parents are suggesting it's the best thing for him.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.3 - Sponsored links:
-
My ideal signings would be:
Lukas Jensen as the new goalie
Carl Piergianni as new CB
Ethan Chislett new attacking mid
Marc Leonard as the new mid.
If we signed all those with what we have, I have no doubts we will be up there.
Jensen is young and only has a year left on his contract.
Piergianni is the experienced captain we need
Chislett will replace Corey's goal threat while suiting Jones system
And Leonard was probably the best midfielder I saw in the league last year, would love to see him here the most.
Expect it wouldn't cost too much to get all 4 and, 2 of them at least would be long term signings for this league and above imo.
Won't happen of course, but I'd love to see it.5 -
Read that as rent boy in the Housebarstool said:A new red boy in the House
must get my eyes checked 😂0 -
I’ll never blame a player for doing what he thinks is best for his career and bank balance but in Miles case I genuinely think he’ll give signing a deal with us again a serious consideration. He’ll certainly get plenty of good advice from his parents. I’m hopeful anyway.killerandflash said:
We really need to tie him down. I'm sure he'll agree to an extended deal, the way we've supported him and indeed spent money on his recovery, but until it actually happens, I'll still be twitchy.balham red said:
Won't Leaburn have only 6 months left on his contract by January? Hardly think he'd be sold for big bucks then. Think we're counting on him signing another contract, as apparently his parents are suggesting it's the best thing for him.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.0 -
Marc Leonard joined Birmingham ?Braziliance said:My ideal signings would be:
Lukas Jensen as the new goalie
Carl Piergianni as new CB
Ethan Chislett new attacking mid
Marc Leonard as the new mid.
If we signed all those with what we have, I have no doubts we will be up there.
Jensen is young and only has a year left on his contract.
Piergianni is the experienced captain we need
Chislett will replace Corey's goal threat while suiting Jones system
And Leonard was probably the best midfielder I saw in the league last year, would love to see him here the most.
Expect it wouldn't cost too much to get all 4 and, 2 of them at least would be long term signings for this league and above imo.
Won't happen of course, but I'd love to see it.0 -
Agree with your assessment about LeaburnSouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.Pity we will not see the best of him in his career. Just hope money is used wisely.1 -
Keeper happy to wait until end of August for chance of Christian Walton.Braziliance said:My ideal signings would be:
Lukas Jensen as the new goalie
Carl Piergianni as new CB
Ethan Chislett new attacking mid
Marc Leonard as the new mid.
If we signed all those with what we have, I have no doubts we will be up there.
Jensen is young and only has a year left on his contract.
Piergianni is the experienced captain we need
Chislett will replace Corey's goal threat while suiting Jones system
And Leonard was probably the best midfielder I saw in the league last year, would love to see him here the most.
Expect it wouldn't cost too much to get all 4 and, 2 of them at least would be long term signings for this league and above imo.
Won't happen of course, but I'd love to see it.
Midfield, No 1 on my list is Brendan Wiredu, if Berry isn't our 10 I'd go to Brighton for a loan but for Caylan Vickers.
At the back, I think Mitchell will be a leader, so a LCB is our main need, no idea who.
For a striker/wide man (if 4-4-2) if Mubama is beyond our reach, I'd go for Kaheim Dixon (loan best for all parties) who I mentioned before may be on our radar already. I guess the European mentioned earlier may also be in this category.
Further loans dictated by our bad luck with injuries up to 31st August.0 -
Will be interesting to see who doesn't play at Dartford or travel to Slovenia.
Fraser we can be sure they want to move on.
One if not both of last season's keepers to leave.
Imagine with Taylor, Ness and Henry we'd listen to offers or loans.
A lot of people saying we need another centre half but we have Lloyd Jones, who was out injured most of Nathan's Jones time, coming back plus REG and Gillesphy plus the Mitchell non-brothers.
Not sure how Jones feels about them all bar A. Mitchell.
1 -
Do think it's interesting no one has gone for Piergianni @Braziliance. I'm not his biggest fan but I'm a bit surprised he hasn't gone to Rotherham or been snapped up by someone a bit higher up the chain than Stevenage. Without Evans I don't expect them to do as well this season.
4 -
I have a funny feeling based on nothing that we will hold out for Sonny Bradley once Derby have signed a someone.9
-
We have invested a lot in Miles' rehabilitation and it is hoped Miles acknowledges this and repays us by signing a new deal. As far as I know he is happy with us and has no intention of jumping shipDubaiCAFC said:
You have to be realistic as to where we are as a club, if a top end championship or premier league club come in with 5 mill bid, would be tough for us to reject.. As long as this money is being re invested, that is fine.SouthLincsAddick said:I posted this on the Ahadme thread, I have a feeling he’s our long-term Leaburn replacement.
The SMT are banging on about a more sustainable set up and are perhaps looking at the Peterborough model. They pay large fees for promising players they know they will sell for profit, sometimes within a year.I think Leaburn is at the end of that cycle, when fit he will command decent money. I’m also convinced if he had stayed fit he would’ve been sold by now.I think that’s why he isn’t being rushed back to playing, they’re taking the extra time so he’ll have a good run in the team till the January window and then be sold. Some of that money will be reinvested in the squad, the rest to keep the losses down. I think this is what Charlie has sold to the owners, some of it is outlined in the Texas document.
Just my hunch mind, I’m not ITK but it may fit some of what has already been revealed.
I’m hoping Charlie boy can pull this off as it can work. I would say that Peterborough have been working this way for 20 years now and their network must be very refined by now. Not as exciting as owners just splashing cash but as with Peterborough it is more sustainable.
He is in high demand because of his statistics and his physical attributes - it's inevitable he will be sold for a good sum of money but hopefully he can fire us up to the Championship.
He really is incredibly unusual to have all the attributes he has and if we can get him fit and firing he is going to be one hell of a player in this division and probably the one above. Closest I can think of is Morgan Whitaker who went for £1.35m last year to Plymouth but is now in the £10m - £12m bracket - partly after a great season but also because he's in the Championship now
that figure is realistic for us but only in the division above20
This discussion has been closed.
