Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
NFL Season 2013/14.
Comments
-
I struggle to comprehend the human race on a fairly frighteningly regular basis.
RIP little Peterson.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000260563/article/adrian-petersons-son-dies-alleged-attacker-in-jail0 -
The last one in 1983. So they're basically Nottingham Forest. Would any Americans be excited to see them play in 2013?CAFCTrev said:
The Raiders have won 3 Superbowls....SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
0 -
So called "famous" teams like the Redskins havent won anything since 1981, the Miami Dolphins havent won anything since 1973, the Cowboys since 1995.SELR_addicks said:
The last one in 1983. So they're basically Nottingham Forest. Would any Americans be excited to see them play in 2013?CAFCTrev said:
The Raiders have won 3 Superbowls....SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
So the point is you should bring only bring teams over that have won a Superbowl or two in the last 5-10 years and preferably are also the Giants/Patriots/Packers?
How many kids in London do you see wearing Raiders gear? I see them everyday, they might not be fans but the team logo is pretty iconic...
Unfortunately those teams that get 80,000+ (ie the likes of the Giants/Cowboys etc....) wouldnt be happy to give up a home game for a wembley game, especially when you only get 8 home games a season anyways, excluding playoff/preseason games. It could happen if they came as the away team as the Giants did in 2007....0 -
^^^^ a good post with lots of very valid points .. the main beauty of the NFL is its ever changing hierarchy although some clubs in the more remote cities with small populations and with less income from the media will always struggle against the big city, especially East Coast teams, not forgetting SF of course0
-
As much as I would love to see a Redskins game, i would hate to see them play at Wembley playing a "home" game as it gives up so many advantages that they gain at home.0
-
Skins won the superbowl in 1993CAFCTrev said:
So called "famous" teams like the Redskins havent won anything since 1981, the Miami Dolphins havent won anything since 1973, the Cowboys since 1995.SELR_addicks said:
The last one in 1983. So they're basically Nottingham Forest. Would any Americans be excited to see them play in 2013?CAFCTrev said:
The Raiders have won 3 Superbowls....SELR_addicks said:Isn't that kinda the equivalent of sending Stoke to play Norwich in America? Hardly big names.
So the point is you should bring only bring teams over that have won a Superbowl or two in the last 5-10 years and preferably are also the Giants/Patriots/Packers?
How many kids in London do you see wearing Raiders gear? I see them everyday, they might not be fans but the team logo is pretty iconic...
Unfortunately those teams that get 80,000+ (ie the likes of the Giants/Cowboys etc....) wouldnt be happy to give up a home game for a wembley game, especially when you only get 8 home games a season anyways, excluding playoff/preseason games. It could happen if they came as the away team as the Giants did in 2007....0 -
Only two unbeaten teams and both in the same division. The chiefs and broncos.0
-
Cards matched the 49ers but their inability to defend sometimes and give turnovers away came into play,0
-
Scrappy 4th Q for the Pats today, Brady showing his worse side then his best side, that final drive was immense, what a way to win a football match0
-
Kansas. Beat raiders to go 6-0 after being 2-14 last year. Steelers win their first game. But looking forward to Peyton retuning to Indianapolis next week.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Standard Jets loss, I know better then to get excited after a winning a game last week well.
Jury is still out on Geno Smith at QB....0 -
Bengals for the SB ?0
-
Nah, don't think Dalton is a SB quarterback.0
-
You're wrong there.MrOneLung said:Nah, don't think Dalton is a SB quarterback.
0 -
Yeah no worse than flaccoNathanPrior said:
You're wrong there.MrOneLung said:Nah, don't think Dalton is a SB quarterback.
0 -
Everyone is better than Big Ben too. He's way past it now, plus it doesn't help that he's a knob too.cs1986 said:
Yeah no worse than flaccoNathanPrior said:
You're wrong there.MrOneLung said:Nah, don't think Dalton is a SB quarterback.
0 -
Not a chance - seeing as they'll have to get through 2 of the Colts, Chiefs and Broncos if they make the playoffsLincsaddick said:Bengals for the SB ?
0 -
7-0 for the chiefs.0
-
Jets beat us in OT, but giving up 17 points with no reply in the 3rd doesn't help matters0
-
Jacksonville - Dallas Cowboys
Atlanta Falcons - Detroit Lions
Oakland Raiders - Miami Dolphins
confirmed for next season0 - Sponsored links:
-
Spot on.northstandsteve said:Fcuk the franchise when you support the Raiders you support the Raiders whether it LA OAKLAND or ORPINGTON proper team
JUST WIN BABY!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RAlrzcdfRY&feature=player_detailpage 0 -
Jax got stuffed, again, at Wembley by the 49-ers (42-10).
Washington up 21-7 at Denver, 10-38 in the 3rd.0 -
Games in the 3rd quater:
New York Jets 9-42 Bengals
Steelers 3-21 Raiders
Redkins 14-21 Broncos
Falcons 6-24 Arizona0 -
21-21 Washington, 4th quarter, 14-30 left.0
-
Is manning playing with two sprained ankles?0
-
nyeaaah, who really cares if the Jessie is or not. boring 'sport'.0
-
Why do you do it?Steve Dowman said:nyeaaah, who really cares if the Jessie is or not. boring 'sport'.
0 -
Manning's made some rank bad throws in this game. Plus, even as a Broncos fan, I think that's f****ing pathetic from DRC - High stepping it into the end zone from the halfway line. You can tell Elway wasn't impressed by it.0
-
Cardinals now on 4-4. Doubt they'll win many more though!0
-
Might also be looking to trade Fitzgerald as well. If he goes you are officially in rebuilding mode.NathanPrior said:Cardinals now on 4-4. Doubt they'll win many more though!
0
