Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
I didn't until now realise it was possible to physically hate someone you have never met. That is in for a treat on the 28th. What a nasty piece of work she is.
Best insult since my brother called a traffic warden a 'shit-faced cock master' last week. No, better actually.
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
Where on earth do you get that from ?
He told us earlier that he was nominated as the fans speaker, and the tweets earlier said it was the fans speaker that apologised for the protest.
Happy to be corrected.
I can't possibly imagine that it was, I think all the fans there were technically "fans speakers" so it was someone else who came up with that gem, I guess we'll see tomorrow when the video is released.
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
From what i have read on here what happened to the list of Pertinent questions that were ready and waiting to be put to KM & RM.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
Well we'll await clarification, and if I have accused him wrongly I will apologize. One of the press tweets earlier suggested it was.
The tweet said something like "fans representative" . Could have been anybody. Doubt any of the press know who the Trust guys are.
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
Where on earth do you get that from ?
He told us earlier that he was nominated as the fans speaker, and the tweets earlier said it was the fans speaker that apologised for the protest.
Happy to be corrected.
I can't possibly imagine that it was, I think all the fans there were technically "fans speakers" so it was someone else who came up with that gem, I guess we'll see tomorrow when the video is released.
Sorry my quoting going wrong, but if that is the case and I have wrongly accused him, of course will apologize. We'll await clarification.
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
I can't remember all the generous quotes made by KM & RM tonight about their wish to have a more open and meaningful dialogue with the fanbase but how about emailing to KM all those questions not asked tonight to see how eager she is to communicate the answers to us. This will give her a starting point for our "new relations" and provide her with the opportunity to put her money where her mouth is. OR, will it prove that it was all the same old BS she thinks she can feed us? Perhaps the SLP would like to be copied in and follow-up the outcome?
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
From what i have read on here what happened to the list of Pertinent questions that were ready and waiting to be put to KM & RM.
By dictating what questions would be answered which is how it seems to me from the aim will be to continue to divide the fan Base a sensible idea for km to do, let the fans consume themselves with the focus of destroying each other and she won't have to do anything, time to bury grievance and personal gripes against eachother and become a unity that they had taken for granted,
A statement like he has a lot to explain indicates resentment and miss trust it also plays right into the hands of km
Surely the right question is hopefully those there can explain the situation
Will be interested to see the Trusts stance on tonight's meeting.
Well by the sound of it, it was the bloke representing the trust that apologised to her for the protest so I wouldn't get your hopes up
I very much doubt it was a bloke representing the Trust. The bloke representing the Trust had some very pertinent questions ready, and would have gone straight into them. Those questions don't seem to have been asked at all.
He has a lot to explain
Who?
The bloke representing the Trust.
Well, if he had the questions ready and wasn't able to ask them, then I think he's as frustrated as you, me and everyone else on this thread.
Comments
He said it sounds as though those on the side of the angels tonight were "punching blancmange " ....
Maybe that should be our code word for you-know-who?
Happy to be corrected.
Well we'll await clarification, and if I have accused him wrongly I will apologize. One of the press tweets earlier suggested it was.
The tweet said something like "fans representative" . Could have been anybody. Doubt any of the press know who the Trust guys are.
***disclaimer***
That was me :-)
A statement like he has a lot to explain indicates resentment and miss trust it also plays right into the hands of km
Surely the right question is hopefully those there can explain the situation