Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent CCC 2016
Comments
-
What more does Northeast have to do to get a call up?
In line for his 3rd ton in 3 matches and is the divisions leading run scorer with 879 runs @97.66...1 -
Massive difference nowadays between div2 rns and Div1 runs.Addickted2TheReds said:What more does Northeast have to do to get a call up?
In line for his 3rd ton in 3 matches and is the divisions leading run scorer with 879 runs @97.66...
Alec Stewart says the gap between the two divisions is bigger than div1 to tests.
Think we are gonna see less and less div2 players getting call ups in the future.0 -
Not just the Div 2 top scorer, also scored more runs than anyone in Div 1, and is scoring runs in other formats too.Addickted2TheReds said:What more does Northeast have to do to get a call up?
In line for his 3rd ton in 3 matches and is the divisions leading run scorer with 879 runs @97.66...
Has to go on the Lions winter tour, surely...1 -
Stevens gone for 63.
c Beer b Briggs
330/4
Slog-sweep that he top edges and it goes miles in the air and caught at mid-wicket.
Blakey comes in.0 -
With regards to Northeast and an England call up, as I've said on the England v Pakistan thread, selectors tend to concentrate on the successful teams at the very top of the League.
In the past players from Surrey and Lancashire got called up when, had they been playing for a County lower down the League, would not have got a smell of Test cricket.
Yorkshire are now in that position and had someone like Lyth played for Kent then he probably would not have received a call up. But, when you go to watch Root, Bairstow, Rashid, Plunkett, Ballance, Bresnan etc etc and Lyth gets a double ton, you are going to undoubtedly have that in your mind.0 -
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/947033.html
Looking at the score card, I see one of the Umpires is the Indian Virender Sharma. Is this normal practice now, to send up and coming Umpires overseas so that they can get used to foreign conditions?0 -
100 for Northeast.1
-
Northeast 101* (162)
4th ton of the season.
1 -
I believe it is - and done on an "exchange" basis.killerandflash said:http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/947033.html
Looking at the score card, I see one of the Umpires is the Indian Virender Sharma. Is this normal practice now, to send up and coming Umpires overseas so that they can get used to foreign conditions?1 -
Blake brings up his 50 with a 6.
50* (74)0 -
Sponsored links:
-
446-4
Northeast 132*
Blake 58*0 -
457-5
Blake lbw b Briggs 61
Northeast 140*0 -
Lots of talk about DBD and Northeast here ---> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/cricket/36789959
13:37 and 14:03pm.0 -
489-6
Tredwell c Wells b Briggs 18
Northeast 152*0 -
Brilliant by the skipper. I agree with the views of others about Kent being a div 2 team thereby limiting Northeast's England chances, but this score and his consistency this season should get the attention of the selectors surely. Are Vince or Ballance really better than him?LenGlover said:489-6
Tredwell c Wells b Briggs 18
Northeast 152*1 -
NoPeter_G said:
Brilliant by the skipper. I agree with the views of others about Kent being a div 2 team thereby limiting Northeast's England chances, but this score and his consistency this season should get the attention of the selectors surely. Are Vince or Ballance really better than him?LenGlover said:489-6
Tredwell c Wells b Briggs 18
Northeast 152*2 -
Knocks this season:
191
189
166*
162*
Over 1000 FC runs this season averaging over 100.
Over 2000 runs in all formats last season.4 -
James Vince is just as much a second division player as Northeast, which is possible an argument to try Northeast, OR an argument that runs in Div 2 aren't as strong as those in Div 1?Peter_G said:
Brilliant by the skipper. I agree with the views of others about Kent being a div 2 team thereby limiting Northeast's England chances, but this score and his consistency this season should get the attention of the selectors surely. Are Vince or Ballance really better than him?LenGlover said:489-6
Tredwell c Wells b Briggs 18
Northeast 152*0 -
Northeast gone for 190.0
-
Northeast out for 190.
559-70 -
Sponsored links:
-
Think he needed 196 for 1000 championship runs this season.0
-
Can county teams loan players? Ie if a top div 1 team needed runs..0
-
568-8
Rabada b Briggs 60 -
Claydon b Magoffin 40
-
575 all out0
-
Usual collapse.3
-
5 wickers for Briggs, so it looks like the spinners will get plenty of action. A shame Riley is still injured, Qayyum is a bit raw0
-
29-1, Claydon picking up the wicket
Something rather amusing about opening the bowling with Rabada...and Stevens! A slight contrast in age, experience and pace0 -
The question, if anyone is actually there, is did Briggs pick up wickets because of genuine turn or because the Kent batsmen made mistakes forcing the pace and getting on with it?killerandflash said:5 wickers for Briggs, so it looks like the spinners will get plenty of action. A shame Riley is still injured, Qayyum is a bit raw
My gut instinct is that this match now has draw written all over it. We've (probably given that it's Kent) scored enough not to lose it but our bowling, given certain absentees, is not penetrative enough to bowl Sussex out twice and win it.
0 -
So, the selectors have made changes to the squad for Old Trafford, but Ballance and Vince look safe. The only threat for one of them might be Ben Stokes.
Carry on piling up the runs Sam. Fantastic season so far. England's loss is Kent's gain. For purely selfish reasons, I wouldn't want him to miss the battle of the bridge on Friday anyway, we've got enough absentees already.1
