Someone, whoever wrote that crap (the shortlist is rather short) has quoted the Meire Dublin/fans forum argument/piece. The text that Meire altered for what the meaning was at the fans forum when confronted.
Who the hell would do that? There is only one obvious person.
Katrien Meire wrote this statement in her own words without any shadow of doubt. She is a frustrated strange individual that just can't do this job to the appropriate professional standard.
I am a believer in psychology as in looking at someone as stupid as her to be a victim of herself. I feel sorry for this lady she needs help. It is utterly pathetic, but also a cry for help.
For such a high profile job she does not understand consequences to any degree. David Brent has more self awareness and common sense.
So we waited for something like 6 months for a head of comms and if she has any sense she will be resigning inside a few weeks if these sorts of things get done above her head. Wow, what a statement. Shambles.
Anyone reckon it was a final fuck you from a "bitter current employee?" That would explain the bizarre layout that doesn't match up with previous articles.
Miere- "Olly, Duchatelet wants you to put his statement on the website" Olly- "Oh, can I change some of it? It looks a bit rough." Miere- "No he wants it on the website exactly like he has written it." Olly- "Exactly as written?" Miere- "Yes." Olly- "Oookay then."
RD - Hello Katrien, Roland here - just been watching the Reading game on the feed, I'm not a happy bunny. You should look at signing that bloke who scored Reading's first 2 goals, he looked good
KM - Ermmm, OK Roland I'll get the analysts report but he is really old you know
RD - Whatever, you know you have my full backing. By the way, I had sound today, what is meant by "stand up if you want them out?"
KM - Ermmm, well the whole crowd want rid of that 2% of negative customers I was telling you about
RD - Well that's good. I'm finding it hard to make you out, is that singing I hear in the background?
KM - Ermmm, yes sir - even in defeat there is a huge crowd outside singing your praises
RD - Yes, I can hear it "Hey Roland, ooh aah". Wait a minute, is c*** not a bad word?
KM - Ermmm, no sir it means great guy, just like weird means unique. Got to go now, these blinds won't shut themselves, everything's rosy here boss, honestly...
I am writing to advise you of a piece of English law called vicarious liability. What this means is that someone who is in control of another person in some way (usually as an employer) can be held legally responsible for their actions or for any injuries suffered by them. If you knew a good lawyer I would expect that they would tell you this, but I don't suppose you do, do you?
Anyway, I am worried about little Katy Merde who works for you. She looks like she might be cracking under the strain of things. If something were to happen to her, or if she were to do something stupid (always a good chance of this), you could be held legally responsible. That would only be right and proper too. It can't be right that you keep her in a position that she is unqualified and unsuited for, where she consistently makes mistakes and where her 'customers' hate her almost as much as they hate you. For her sake please find a job that she is more suited to. Given the tone of her last missive, I'd recommend that you do this as a matter of urgency. Also I think it would be a positive move if you could encourage her to visit her doctor. It would be a nice touch if you could take her personally. I know that doctors take an oath and won't discuss patient health with third parties, but when you drop her off you might like to mention a few words in passing about stress, ptsd and downright incompetence.
I was invited to the Training Ground today along with other hospitality customers. We were accompanied by the Senior Management team and prior to the tour we had a chance to put some questions to KM. I don't think she was expecting it and seemed a bit rattled that about half of us were asking questions that she didn't like.
I had hoped that there would have been a Q & A session with the SMT at the end, but that was with JJ, Ademola & Alou Diarra.
As we were leaving I went up to her on my own and took the opportunity to ask her if she was going to respond to CARD's statement and whether they would be meeting the Trust. During that conversation she said to me that Roland had met with some fans. I thought nothing of that at the time, but for it to appear in the 'statement' tonight seems a bit of a coincidence.
That's interesting. Joking aside, who on earth could those fans have been? How would they have been got together, when he only visited for a few hours on a non matchday.
The fans Roland met:
1. Richard Murray 2. The security guard 3. Richard Cawley. He didn't realise his black and white scarf was a Fulham one.
I am speechless !!! What a aggressive, unprofessional, hurtful, thoughtless, badly written pile of junk !! Well don RD, you have well and truly outdone yourself this time !!
Well, it's been rollercoaster gents - but before I go, allow me to leave you a timeline of the last 3 hours, in the medium of Tay Tay...
It started with seeming confusion - had a tantrum prone toddler really been given control of the clubs communications.. Surely it was just a hack?
After much debate and painful inspection of the poorly generated markup of the page, it was confirmed... The post was real.
As the news sunk in, the overwhelming sentiment was not one of anger or hatred, but of sheer concern at the new level of absurdity that the situation had reached...
A level of such absurdity clearly called for it's own absurd medium of conveying it, and for me, that medium was the swiftmeister herself..
Alas, I enjoyed it so much I think this will be my new medium of conveying poignant messages and short stories..
Let's face it, it makes about as much sense as anything else has this evening.
2nd from bottom pic, wow!! But how does one person look like a different person in every pic? Maybe there are actually lots of different Taylors?
Apologies if this has already been mentioned (I haven't worked my way through all 21 pages yet). To compound matters for Katrien, she also says in the Dublin interview in a very supercilious and derisive way that she finds it “quite funny” (meaning ridiculous) that fans should feel a sense of ownership when all they do is pay their ticket money, which makes up only a third of the club’s revenue stream. She then goes on to say that this sense of ownership is "weird" (meaning weird).
I'm afraid, Roland, or whoever wrote that ludicrous statement, there is no wriggling out of this. Anyone with any awareness of the history of football, any feeling for the game at all, would understand the symbiosis between club and fan base, the depth of attachment, the intergenerational commitment, the loyalty which fans in general and Charlton fans in particular have given and continue to give to their club. It's not all about who pays the bills, any more than a family is. So much for the 12th man being crucial!
Why is the title just 'Statement' on the website? It's so bizarre. It's as though whoever posted it knew it was an absolute disaster so couldn't even be bothered to write a proper title
This is the one thing where I'm prepared to give the benefit of the doubt to KM. Speaking in a second language, it would be easy for her to use 'wierd' where she meant something like 'unusual', which is what the sense of ownership fans feel for a club is, when compared to, say, they way cinema-goers feel about their local fleapit. Still, she was an idiot for not getting a native English speaker to check it for her. A piece of "Dunglish" (cf. a previous post on this thread).
Sorry but this can never be used as an excuse because it is simply inexusable. She is from a European country, is/was a lawyer, studied in a university in the UK for some time, uses English on a daily basis at corporate level. She's a CEO of a big English company (us) and if her English is really that bad, she doesn't meet the basic requirements of this job, does she?
English is not my native language either but even I thought the 'weird' thing was shocking and she should never have said that. It's in fact not a case about second language. Till this day she's still arguing about it, making a laughable attempt ( {...}??? Really??? I couldn't believe my eyes! What did she think she was writing? A thesis?) to explain it in such an outrageous statement so it's clear proof that they really mean what they've been saying. They do think we're weird because they don't understand us. They couldn't be drunk when they put that statement out. It's a bold confrontation. It reflects what they think about the whole situation. In fact they've been treating us as if we're the enemy to defeat or the problem to solve for almost two years. The statemente is, in a way, a good thing because it makes more people realise that Duchatelet and his incompetent CEO should never have had entered the football business and the only way for our club to survive is a change in ownership.
This is the one thing where I'm prepared to give the benefit of the doubt to KM. Speaking in a second language, it would be easy for her to use 'wierd' where she meant something like 'unusual', which is what the sense of ownership fans feel for a club is, when compared to, say, they way cinema-goers feel about their local fleapit. Still, she was an idiot for not getting a native English speaker to check it for her. A piece of "Dunglish" (cf. a previous post on this thread).
Sorry but this can never be used as an excuse because it is simply inexusable. She is from a European country, is/was a lawyer, studied in a university in the UK for some time, uses English on a daily basis at corporate level. She's a CEO of a big English company (us) and if her English is really that bad, she doesn't meet the basic requirements of this job, does she?
English is not my native language either but even I thought the 'weird' thing was shocking and she should never have said that. It's in fact not a case about second language. Till this day she's still arguing about it, making a laughable attempt ( {...}??? Really??? I couldn't believe my eyes! What did she think she was writing? A thesis?) to explain it in such an outrageous statement so it's clear proof that they really mean what they've been saying. They do think we're weird because they don't understand us. They couldn't be drunk when they put that statement out. It's a bold confrontation. It reflects what they think about the whole situation. In fact they've been treating us as if we're the enemy to defeat or the problem to solve for almost two years. The statemente is, in a way, a good thing because it makes more people realise that Duchatelet and his incompetent CEO should never have had entered the football business and the only way for our club to survive is a change in ownership.
Absolutely spot on. Meire clearly has an excellent grasp of English (sadly not of football). Also, she had lots of time in Dublin to qualify her statement, but chose not to. Either she meant exactly what she said then, or she's a simpering idiot (actually, there's a chance she's both).
Stan has been very supportive as have most of the Talksport team , same goes for sky sports. Don't seem to be getting the same support from the BBC it seems , no wonder I guess when their phone in has KM's friend working on it.
Just checked, it's still on the OS. If the OS hasn't been hacked and this has come from Roland, their answer when trying to put things right, will be that someone hacked his email account.
Comments
Who the hell would do that? There is only one obvious person.
Katrien Meire wrote this statement in her own words without any shadow of doubt. She is a frustrated strange individual that just can't do this job to the appropriate professional standard.
I am a believer in psychology as in looking at someone as stupid as her to be a victim of herself. I feel sorry for this lady she needs help. It is utterly pathetic, but also a cry for help.
For such a high profile job she does not understand consequences to any degree.
David Brent has more self awareness and common sense.
How can anyone relatively informed by what's going on read that statement and come up with a soft headline!?
Daily Mail have got it bang on
Miere- "Olly, Duchatelet wants you to put his statement on the website"
Olly- "Oh, can I change some of it? It looks a bit rough."
Miere- "No he wants it on the website exactly like he has written it."
Olly- "Exactly as written?"
Miere- "Yes."
Olly- "Oookay then."
RD - Hello Katrien, Roland here - just been watching the Reading game on the feed, I'm not a happy bunny. You should look at signing that bloke who scored Reading's first 2 goals, he looked good
KM - Ermmm, OK Roland I'll get the analysts report but he is really old you know
RD - Whatever, you know you have my full backing. By the way, I had sound today, what is meant by "stand up if you want them out?"
KM - Ermmm, well the whole crowd want rid of that 2% of negative customers I was telling you about
RD - Well that's good. I'm finding it hard to make you out, is that singing I hear in the background?
KM - Ermmm, yes sir - even in defeat there is a huge crowd outside singing your praises
RD - Yes, I can hear it "Hey Roland, ooh aah". Wait a minute, is c*** not a bad word?
KM - Ermmm, no sir it means great guy, just like weird means unique. Got to go now, these blinds won't shut themselves, everything's rosy here boss, honestly...
FAO: Roland Duchatelet
M. Duchatelet,
I am writing to advise you of a piece of English law called vicarious liability. What this means is that someone who is in control of another person in some way (usually as an employer) can be held legally responsible for their actions or for any injuries suffered by them. If you knew a good lawyer I would expect that they would tell you this, but I don't suppose you do, do you?
Anyway, I am worried about little Katy Merde who works for you. She looks like she might be cracking under the strain of things. If something were to happen to her, or if she were to do something stupid (always a good chance of this), you could be held legally responsible. That would only be right and proper too. It can't be right that you keep her in a position that she is unqualified and unsuited for, where she consistently makes mistakes and where her 'customers' hate her almost as much as they hate you. For her sake please find a job that she is more suited to. Given the tone of her last missive, I'd recommend that you do this as a matter of urgency. Also I think it would be a positive move if you could encourage her to visit her doctor. It would be a nice touch if you could take her personally. I know that doctors take an oath and won't discuss patient health with third parties, but when you drop her off you might like to mention a few words in passing about stress, ptsd and downright incompetence.
Good luck with finding an able replacement.
Stig
1. Richard Murray
2. The security guard
3. Richard Cawley. He didn't realise his black and white scarf was a Fulham one.
Like I've said before...
Night Meire is an Ignoramus. Or, to put it another way, an ignorant and stupid person.
Hey everyone, remember that time someone posted an absolute batshit rambling nonsensical "Statement" on the official site? That was HILARIOUS!!!
I'm afraid, Roland, or whoever wrote that ludicrous statement, there is no wriggling out of this. Anyone with any awareness of the history of football, any feeling for the game at all, would understand the symbiosis between club and fan base, the depth of attachment, the intergenerational commitment, the loyalty which fans in general and Charlton fans in particular have given and continue to give to their club. It's not all about who pays the bills, any more than a family is. So much for the 12th man being crucial!
Shes the new head of Comms.....
Collymore's right, they are seriously cracking!
There's going to have to be some serious damage control tomorrow.
At 3 mins 15 seconds into the video below...
"So this year we will be doing something very UNIQUE in England, I don't think it has been done before...we will have a pitch side sofa" etc etc
Strange how she didn't say weird in this case isn't it?
English is not my native language either but even I thought the 'weird' thing was shocking and she should never have said that. It's in fact not a case about second language. Till this day she's still arguing about it, making a laughable attempt ( {...}??? Really??? I couldn't believe my eyes! What did she think she was writing? A thesis?) to explain it in such an outrageous statement so it's clear proof that they really mean what they've been saying. They do think we're weird because they don't understand us. They couldn't be drunk when they put that statement out. It's a bold confrontation. It reflects what they think about the whole situation. In fact they've been treating us as if we're the enemy to defeat or the problem to solve for almost two years. The statemente is, in a way, a good thing because it makes more people realise that Duchatelet and his incompetent CEO should never have had entered the football business and the only way for our club to survive is a change in ownership.
Today will be interesting.
Meire will either spin us another load of lies to try and wriggle out of this, or she'll go AWOL for the next few weeks.
Do you know what that proves. I mean seriously do you know what that proves.
Anyone and I mean anyone could be a millionaire.
It's the best news ever.
This is also backed up by the fact that Donald c*nt face Trump is a BILLIONAIRE.
ladies and gents dig in, there is a rather simplistic unthoutful stupidly easy way of getting rich.
Just gotta crack that unique/weird code.