Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Questions for CAST to ask Matt Southall, 11 March

1234689

Comments

  • Rob7Lee said:
    We will remain impartial, we have also sought a meeting with Nimer and the EFL also.
    Is this a meeting for all Trust members or just the Trust board ?
    3 board members are attending.
  • Talal said:
    Rob7Lee said:
    We will remain impartial, we have also sought a meeting with Nimer and the EFL also.
    Don't go easy on him though he doesn't deserve it. 
    Yeah ffs, please don't waste this opportunity to get stuck in. You've got enough facts to go at him for, why would you want to remain impartial?
  • I personally cannot see how this meeting will be benifical to us fans.

    If MS had any credibility he would come clean, but he will use this platform to either deflect blame or will simply not respond to the accusations as he will hide behind his lawyer.

    Whilst I respect the people attending just think its pointless and could be frustrating for those involved. 
  • I'm not sure he's equipped to defend the overwhelming evidence that he's fleecing the club, you only have to watch his interview with the comms bloke to see he's blagging the senior executive persona. Car crash coming I think (although to be fair Range Rovers are pretty sturdy)
  • I've had to cancel my holiday abroad, due to the corona virus, any chance you can put your new gaff on Air Bnb , so we can rent it out?
  • Sponsored links:


  • With all your bitches and car's, is the flat used to play put you Range's keys in the fruit bowl?
  • Green or Wagstaff.
  • A rhetorical question for Matt Southall.

    Your position is untenable.
  • edited March 2020
    You were put here by the majority shareholder at his pleasure. He now doesn't want you here, what right do you have to maintain your position?

    Why are you choosing to drag the club down with you rather than let it start fresh with the majority shareholders chosen chairperson?

    Is moving forward with you as chairman and NO financial backing the best possible move for the club, or just for Matt Southall?
  • Chunes said:
    You were put here by the majority shareholder at his pleasure. He now doesn't want you here, what right do you have to maintain your position?

    Why are you choosing to drag the club down with you than let it start fresh with the majority shareholders chosen chairperson?

    Is moving forward with you as chairman and NO financial backing is the best possible move for the club, or just for you?
    100%
  • Remaining impartial isn't the same as not challenging what they say. Ask them to prove their claims. They will lie all night. They don't deserve that platform unchallenged.

    We've just been shown evidence that MS is fleecing the club. Him just saying that Nimer is also doing it doesn't cut the mustard when there's no evidence of that.


    I'm sure he will try to do just that. For example the expenses sheet we've seen is obviously only part of it, Nimer must be on that sheet somewhere.

    Southall's only way to remain at the club is to make Nimer look worse and prove himself to be the lesser of 2 evils so Nimer decides he's had enough and fucks off..........and even then Southall has to go and find a replacement investor.

    Alternatively (and far more likely) he comes to an agreement and leaves.
  • What time is this meeting please?
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited March 2020
    Remaining impartial isn't the same as not challenging what they say. Ask them to prove their claims. They will lie all night. They don't deserve that platform unchallenged.

    We've just been shown evidence that MS is fleecing the club. Him just saying that Nimer is also doing it doesn't cut the mustard when there's no evidence of that.


    I'm sure he will try to do just that. For example the expenses sheet we've seen is obviously only part of it, Nimer must be on that sheet somewhere.

    Southall's only way to remain at the club is to make Nimer look worse and prove himself to be the lesser of 2 evils so Nimer decides he's had enough and fucks off..........and even then Southall has to go and find a replacement investor.

    Alternatively (and far more likely) he comes to an agreement and leaves.
    I have a feeling that this is the only real option for Matt Southall. Failing that they might just say. We are fucking off sign here the clubs yours. Ta Ta:)

    Then the real fun begins:)
  • If the meeting is only being attended by cast board members and MS, there needs to be minutes taken and published otherwise it’s completely pointless, self serving propaganda.
  • Fumbluff said:
    How old did you think @sage was?
    Deserves more LOLs that
  • If the meeting is only being attended by cast board members and MS, there needs to be minutes taken and published otherwise it’s completely pointless, self serving propaganda.
    I'd be happy to come along and take the minutes. Let me know asap bacause I'd need to leave now
  • When was the last time someone got tar and feathered in this country?
  • Has this conman chancer actually shown his face around the club today? 
  • When @Rob7Lee uses the word "impartial" I believe he means that both parties appear right now to be unfit to own our club, until they can prove otherwise. There are plenty of questions for Tanoon and his mates too, but they will be harder to get hold of. That is not a reason not to meet Southall if he is willing to do so. Last time I heard ( this morning), it is still on.
  • If Nimer’s solicitor is to believed Southall may be removed before the meeting. At the very least he is a dead man walking. Worth meeting him just to give him what for I’d say. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!