Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Ohhhhh Jeremy Corrrrrrbyn
Comments
-
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".6 -
Those reactions were equally stupid.Friend Or Defoe said:
Be interesting to see the posts on here following the calm down dear remark.SantaClaus said:People are worrying about someone muttering 'stupid woman'? This country has lost its mind.
0 -
Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
"but can you prove I am not accepting it?" - Seth, probably.0 -
Have you not seen whats been written on here, or on Twitter. There's defintely been outrage about it. Double standards haven't been applied at all.Gravesend_Addick said:Although I'm personally not bothered about Corbyn calling May a stupid woman, I can absolutely guarantee if a Tory MP had said it about a female Labour MP, there would be outrage.
Double standards2 -
We really need cross party cooperation to "resolve" the Brexit crisis and what do we get.
MP's arguing the toss over whether or not Corbyn muttered "stupid woman" under his breath.
It really is too pathetic for words.
It then escalated to Leadsom saying the Speaker had called her stupid, but he didn't apologise in the House either.
Where's Guy Fawkes ?
4 -
i think whats more outrageous is that he denies saying it. Despite it being plainly obvious he's saying "stupid woman"0
-
In the scheme of things does it matter that much ? I think not.kentaddick said:i think whats more outrageous is that he denies saying it. Despite it being plainly obvious he's saying "stupid woman"
The EU must be pissing themselves.7 -
The man's just plain evil.3
-
Good timing for the Tories though to take some of the focus off of May’s deal in the last couple of days before the recesskentaddick said:i think whats more outrageous is that he denies saying it. Despite it being plainly obvious he's saying "stupid woman"
0 -
Well exactly, why make it into another big deal by denying it? Own up to it, apologise and move on.Covered End said:
In the scheme of things does it matter that much ? I think not.kentaddick said:i think whats more outrageous is that he denies saying it. Despite it being plainly obvious he's saying "stupid woman"
The EU must be pissing themselves.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
0 -
You can’t prove he hasn’t supported any other leader though can you?Henry Irving said:
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
GOTCHA0 -
Absolutely ... but it appears that Corbyn ‘stupidly’ initiated it even though he knew he was being filmed.se9addick said:
Good timing for the Tories though to take some of the focus off of May’s deal in the last couple of days before the recesskentaddick said:i think whats more outrageous is that he denies saying it. Despite it being plainly obvious he's saying "stupid woman"
0 -
and he does say "zionist" which is fine and in no way a cover word for "Jewish" as we know.kentaddick said:
You can’t prove he hasn’t supported any other leader though can you?Henry Irving said:
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
GOTCHA
Maybe rather than attacking Griffin we should attempt to re-educate him?0 -
We need to invite him to parliament to be heard and given a fair hearing, he is our friend after all.Henry Irving said:
and he does say "zionist" which is fine and in no way a cover word for "Jewish" as we know.kentaddick said:
You can’t prove he hasn’t supported any other leader though can you?Henry Irving said:
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
GOTCHA
Maybe rather than attacking Griffin we should attempt to re-educate him?0 -
Can't see any flaw in that argument, at all. How else can we stop fascism?kentaddick said:
We need to invite him to parliament to be heard and given a fair hearing, he is our friend after all.Henry Irving said:
and he does say "zionist" which is fine and in no way a cover word for "Jewish" as we know.kentaddick said:
You can’t prove he hasn’t supported any other leader though can you?Henry Irving said:
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
GOTCHA
Maybe rather than attacking Griffin we should attempt to re-educate him?0 -
I
You are simply wrong. I have not denied or excused anything, I have looked at the evidence, indeed a week or so ago Henry invited me to look at his 100 pieces of 'evidence' and weigh each of them up.Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
(it was in a conversation about the use of the word 'abundance' I believe).
The key bit that you have written is the word 'accept'.
Accept it because you say so?
If you're saying 'accept it because it is true', then forgive me if I choose to examine things to decide for myself if it is true rather than simply 'accepting it' because others say so.
1 -
Are you trying to make some kind of point here?kentaddick said:Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
"but can you prove I am not accepting it?" - Seth, probably.1 -
Now that is "stupid" behaviour - although nothing to do with her gender.clive said:
Swift action by the party too which is to be applauded.
By-election with a 600 majority should be interesting0 - Sponsored links:
-
You can't prove i'm not.seth plum said:
Are you trying to make some kind of point here?kentaddick said:Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
"but can you prove I am not accepting it?" - Seth, probably.0 -
Corbyn refers to 'the Zionists who were in the audience'...listen back.Henry Irving said:
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
If that is an example of anti-semitism then I simply disagree.-1 -
Loving this thread.
Please keep it up chaps.5 -
seth plum said:
Corbyn refers to 'the Zionists who were in the audience'...listen back.Henry Irving said:
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
If that is an example of anti-semitism then I simply disagree.
You have outdone yourself @seth plum you really have.
Read it again
1 -
10/10 for effort.seth plum said:
Corbyn refers to 'the Zionists who were in the audience'...listen back.Henry Irving said:
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
If that is an example of anti-semitism then I simply disagree.0 -
THIS IS NOT SAFE FOR WORK.
Other politicians do it other ways.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugailEn8U5o
And yet again they're all at it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMpBN_MmX7o 0 -
No, the key word is 'excuses'.seth plum said:I
You are simply wrong. I have not denied or excused anything, I have looked at the evidence, indeed a week or so ago Henry invited me to look at his 100 pieces of 'evidence' and weigh each of them up.Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
(it was in a conversation about the use of the word 'abundance' I believe).
The key bit that you have written is the word 'accept'.
Accept it because you say so?
If you're saying 'accept it because it is true', then forgive me if I choose to examine things to decide for myself if it is true rather than simply 'accepting it' because others say so.
One you continue to make as you don't like, or agree with, the facts.
0 -
You are simply wrong.Addickted said:
No, the key word is 'excuses'.seth plum said:I
You are simply wrong. I have not denied or excused anything, I have looked at the evidence, indeed a week or so ago Henry invited me to look at his 100 pieces of 'evidence' and weigh each of them up.Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
(it was in a conversation about the use of the word 'abundance' I believe).
The key bit that you have written is the word 'accept'.
Accept it because you say so?
If you're saying 'accept it because it is true', then forgive me if I choose to examine things to decide for myself if it is true rather than simply 'accepting it' because others say so.
One you continue to make as you don't like, or agree with, the facts.
You may define facts to suit yourself, I am prepared to examine what is purported to be a 'fact'.1 -
"alternative facts".seth plum said:
You are simply wrong.Addickted said:
No, the key word is 'excuses'.seth plum said:I
You are simply wrong. I have not denied or excused anything, I have looked at the evidence, indeed a week or so ago Henry invited me to look at his 100 pieces of 'evidence' and weigh each of them up.Addickted said:
You choose to find excuses and not accept it, more like.seth plum said:
In answer to your question. No, I do not choose to ignore it, however I often choose to seek it.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet you choose to ignore it?seth plum said:
Fixed that for you.Covered End said:
Seth, that is a CL all time classic.seth plum said:
I am not defending him. I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.se9addick said:
Your defence of him in the face of mounting evidence against him, including misogynistic comments made by him just moments ago, suggests that you do.seth plum said:
Where have I said I favour him?se9addick said:kentaddick said:nothing like a bit of misogyny by the leader of the opposition at PMQ's
Bloody hell Seth. I wonder what this bloke would have to do to lose your favour.seth plum said:Calling somebody stupid is one thing. Does ca!long somebody a stupid woman make you an eternal card carrying misogynist?
For the absence of doubt he definitely said it.
Personally I wouldn't have used the word stupid or woman when describing her.
There are other words.
Is calling the Prime Minister of this country a “stupid woman” abhorrent and unfitting of a person who wants to lead the Opposition (and one day the country)?
I'm not defending him I am engaging with the evidence presented which I see as a different thing.
Simply brilliant.
Sometimes truth does have a simple beauty.
"No M'Lud, although he was standing over the body, holding the bloodied knife, I chose to see a different thing".
(it was in a conversation about the use of the word 'abundance' I believe).
The key bit that you have written is the word 'accept'.
Accept it because you say so?
If you're saying 'accept it because it is true', then forgive me if I choose to examine things to decide for myself if it is true rather than simply 'accepting it' because others say so.
One you continue to make as you don't like, or agree with, the facts.
You may define facts to suit yourself, I am prepared to examine what is purported to be a 'fact'.
Straight out the bannon playbook once again1 -
Henry Irving said:seth plum said:
Corbyn refers to 'the Zionists who were in the audience'...listen back.Henry Irving said:
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
If that is an example of anti-semitism then I simply disagree.
You have outdone yourself @seth plum you really have.
Read it againHenry Irving said:seth plum said:
Corbyn refers to 'the Zionists who were in the audience'...listen back.Henry Irving said:
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
If that is an example of anti-semitism then I simply disagree.
You have outdone yourself @seth plum you really have.
Read it again
I have listened to it.Henry Irving said:seth plum said:
Corbyn refers to 'the Zionists who were in the audience'...listen back.Henry Irving said:
Nick Griffin
Verified account
@NickGriffinBU
Follow Follow @NickGriffinBU
More
Go Jezza! I wonder how many Labour activists the hysterical #Zionist media campaign against #Corbyn is re-pilling?
Now, I think that what Griffin says is antisemitic but I'm sure @seth plum will ask for some more evidence
If that is an example of anti-semitism then I simply disagree.
You have outdone yourself @seth plum you really have.
Read it again
Do I also need to read the Daily Mail's unbiased commentary on it as well?
Does Corbyn say 'the Zionists who were in the audience'?
I think if you listen you will hear him say that.0
This discussion has been closed.
